武汉市政府机关“三公”经费公开研究

发布时间：2017-12-28 08:46

本文关键词：武汉市政府机关“三公”经费公开研究　出处：《华中师范大学》2015年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：“三公”经费公开是政府的法定义务,是依法治国中心环节的要求,是实现公民知情权和保障民主政治正常运行的重要条件,是党风廉政建设和反腐败的切入点。近年来,党和政府不断强调“三公”经费的公开,中央政府各部门以及地方各级政府都不同程度的贯彻此项要求,将“三公”经费公开作为政府信息公开的核心内容之一。武汉市人民政府更是在其门户网站上积极开辟专门板块对各政府部门的“三公”经费进行公开。本文选择武汉市属行政机关共42个部门101份“三公”经费公开文本为样本进行研究分析,时间从2010年度到2013年度。结合国际通用数据公开标准,综合运用内容分析法、文献研究法、描述性统计分析等方法对文本的完整性、具体性、及时性、便利性、易懂性进行分析,分析结果显示,从总体上看,“三公”经费公开报告的质量是逐年有所提高的,但是距离国际标准还有一定的差距。主要表现为内容笼统简单、细化程度不够、交叉检验难以实现、公众看明白不易,公而不细是其最大也是最核心的问题。本研究主要包括五个部分。第一部分是绪论,主要是研究背景及意义、国内外研究现状、研究方法。第二部分是理论及方法概述,主要是明确“三公”经费的含义,了解“三公”经费公开的相关理论基础以及内容分析法。第三部分则是在明确内容分析法的基础上对整个研究设计进行简单明了的介绍,并结合国际通用数据公布规范对“三公”经费公开文本的规范性及系统性建立分析标准,为实证研究分析部分奠定基础。第四部分是实证研究分析,通过时间维度的纵向比较和横向维度的部门比较,对“三公”经费公开文本的完整性、具体性、及时性、便利性、易懂性进行分析,以期发现某些规律或者问题。最后一部分则是依据前文的分析做出相应的结论分析,并根据分析结果进行大胆的原因分析,提出针对性的措施：完善相关法律法规,指导“三公”经费公开的规范化；解放思想,重视“三公”经费的公开与监督；形成机制,保障“三公”经费公开的规范化。本文的主要创新点：一方面将GDDS(数据公布通用系统)与我国信息公开文本进行比较,构建数据质量分析的指标,并以此为分析框架进行论文主体部分的行文；另一方面使用内容分析法,并结合描述性统计方法对文本质量的科学性和系统性进行研究。
[Abstract]:The opening of "three public funds" is a statutory obligation of the government, a requirement for the central link of the rule of law, an important condition for the realization of citizens' right to know and the normal operation of democratic politics, and a starting point for building a clean and honest government and anti-corruption. In recent years, the party and the government continue to emphasize the openness of the "three public" funds, and all departments of the central government and local governments at all levels carry out this requirement to varying degrees, making the "three public" funds open as one of the core contents of the government information disclosure. The people's Government of Wuhan has actively opened up special plates on its portal website to open the "three public" funds of various government departments. In this paper, 42 departments of Wuhan municipal administration were selected to study and analyze 101 public texts of "three public" funds, from 2010 to 2013. According to the international general data open standard, content analysis on the integrated use of literature research and descriptive statistical analysis method on completeness and text specific, timeliness, convenience, easy to carry on the analysis, the analysis results showed that on the whole, "three" by the quality cost public report is increased year by year. However, there is still a gap from the international standard. The main contents are: the content is simple, the degree of refinement is not enough, the cross examination is hard to achieve, and the public can see that it is not easy to be understood. This study mainly includes five parts. The first part is the introduction, mainly the research background and significance, the domestic and foreign research status, research methods. The second part is the summary of theory and method, mainly to clarify the meaning of "three public" funds, and to understand the theoretical basis and content analysis method of "three public funds". The third part is based on specific content analysis on the research and design of simple introduction, combined with the norms established and systematic analysis of the standard of "the three public funds released by the international general text data, which is a fundamental part of the empirical analysis. The fourth part is the empirical research and analysis. Through the longitudinal comparison of the time dimension and the comparison of the horizontal dimension departments, we analyze the integrity, concreteness, timeliness, convenience and comprehensibility of the three public funds, so as to find some rules or problems. The last part is on the basis of the above analysis and make the corresponding conclusion, and analyze the reason of bold according to the analysis results, we put forward corresponding measures: improving the relevant laws and regulations, to guide the "three public funding; emancipate the mind, pay attention to" public supervision and three funds; formation mechanism, guarantee "three public funds standardized. The main innovation of this paper: on the one hand, the GDDS (GDDS) compared with China's information disclosure text, construction of data quality analysis indicators, and as for the main part of the paper analysis framework; on the other hand, using the method of content analysis, and scientific and systematic and descriptive statistical method the quality of text.
【学位授予单位】：华中师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D630.9;F812.45

【参考文献】