超越江南一隅:“江南核心性”与全球史视野有机整合

发布时间：2018-03-15 13:00

本文选题：江南核心性　切入点：明清社会经济史　出处：《探索与争鸣》2016年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：明清社会经济史研究的"江南核心性"是指在明清社会经济结构的整体性思考中,把江南放在核心性位置,认识江南在明清社会经济史体系中的主导角色。对于江南核心性的研究思考,从区域差异及其在整体历史中的角色出发,既从王朝国家制度和历史整体结构的区域因素着眼,同时也强调核心区域在王朝国家的整体性历史发展中的主导作用。事实上,处理江南地方管治形成的制度并不会直接复制为中央的制度,也不可能直接套用到其他地区。明清时期国家制度的改变,不仅是由包含江南地区在内的各个不同区域的管治做法集合而成,更多的是在一个整体性国家和社会经济结构中,从不同区域之间的联系和互动机制中形成和改变。展望今后的江南研究,务必走出地方历史研究碎片化的危险,在整体性的历史视野中,发掘出更多地方性的局部细碎的历史事实,才能赋予地方性事实以超越地方的意义,拓展整体性历史认识的空间。
[Abstract]:The core of the social and economic history of the Ming and Qing dynasties refers to the centrality of the south of the Yangtze River in the overall thinking of the social and economic structure of the Ming and Qing dynasties. To understand the leading role of Jiangnan in the social and economic history system of Ming and Qing dynasties, to think about the core of Jiangnan, starting from the regional difference and its role in the whole history, both from the regional factors of the dynastic state system and the whole structure of history. At the same time, it also emphasizes the leading role of the core regions in the overall historical development of the dynastic country. In fact, the system of handling the local governance in the southern part of the Yangtze River will not be directly replicated as the central system. Nor can it be directly applied to other regions. The changes in the state system during the Ming and Qing dynasties were not only a collection of governance practices in different regions, including the southern part of the Yangtze River, but also more in a holistic national and socio-economic structure. Form and change from the mechanism of connection and interaction between different regions. Looking forward to the future study of Jiangnan, we must step out of the danger of fragmentation of local historical research, and in a holistic historical perspective, Only by discovering more local and local facts can the local facts transcend the local significance and expand the space of the whole historical understanding.
【作者单位】：中山大学历史学系;中山大学历史人类学研究中心;
【分类号】：F812.9

【参考文献】