开放经济、环保财政支出与污染治理——来自中国省级与行业面板数据的经验证据

发布时间：2018-04-22 00:27

本文选题：开放经济 + 环保财政支出　；参考：《中国人口·资源与环境》2017年10期

【摘要】：首先按照各省环保财政支出占GDP比重与按主成分分析法计算的地方环境污染物排放综合指数的排名情况把中国30个省份分成两个区域,区域1环保财政支出污染治理效应较强,区域2环保财政支出污染治理效应较弱。区域1包括北京、海南等14个省市,区域2包括天津、上海等16个省市。其次基于2007—2014年中国省级和行业面板数据,分析开放经济、环保财政支出对污染治理的影响。最后借鉴门限回归模型检验开放经济是否存在环保财政支出与污染治理的门槛效应。结果显示:(1)环境污染物排放存在区域差异和行业差异,区域1呈现出开放程度和污染物排放双低的特征,而区域2则表现为双高特征。制造业、电力、煤气及水的生产和供应业污染物排放较高,采掘业污染物排放年均增长速度最快。(2)样本期内省级和行业面板数据均表明开放经济与环境污染物排放显著负相关,对外开放不是助推环境污染的原因。(3)中国环保财政支出与环境污染物排放显著负相关,环保财政支出具有显著的污染治理效应。(4)开放经济对环保财政支出的污染治理效应具有门槛效应,当进口和出口贸易总额高于门槛值-1.221、-1.016时环保财政支出的污染治理效应很难发挥。(5)以进、出口贸易总额为门槛变量时,有107个观测值低于门槛值,占总观测值的44.58%,其中有59个位于区域1,占55.14%。鉴于此应继续加大环境保护财政支出,进一步提升环保财政专项支出在GDP中所占比重,保持适度的对外开放,优化能源消费结构和实现产业结构升级,全面改善环境质量,提升开放经济下环保财政支出的污染治理效应。
[Abstract]:Firstly, 30 provinces in China are divided into two regions according to the proportion of environmental financial expenditure in GDP and the comprehensive index of local environmental pollutant emissions calculated by principal component analysis. Region 2 environmental protection fiscal expenditure pollution control effect is weak. Region 1 includes Beijing, Hainan and other 14 provinces and cities, region 2 including Tianjin, Shanghai and other 16 provinces and cities. Secondly, based on the provincial and industry panel data from 2007 to 2014, the paper analyzes the impact of open economy and environmental expenditure on pollution control. Finally, the threshold regression model is used to test whether there is the threshold effect of environmental financial expenditure and pollution control in open economy. The results showed that there were regional and industry differences in the discharge of environmental pollutants. Region 1 showed the characteristics of both open degree and low emission of pollutants, while region 2 showed double high characteristics. The provincial and industry panel data of manufacturing, electricity, gas and water production and water production and supply industries show that there is a significant negative correlation between open economy and environmental pollutant emissions during the sample period. Opening to the outside world is not the cause of promoting environmental pollution. (3) there is a significant negative correlation between China's environmental financial expenditure and environmental pollutant emissions. Environmental financial expenditure has significant pollution control effect. (4) Open economy has threshold effect on pollution control effect of environmental financial expenditure. When the total import and export trade is above the threshold -1.221 ~ 1.016, the pollution control effect of the environmental financial expenditure is very difficult to bring into play. When the total export trade is the threshold variable, 107 observed values are below the threshold. Of the total observed values, 59 were located in area 1, accounting for 55.14. In view of this, we should continue to increase the financial expenditure on environmental protection, further enhance the proportion of special expenditure on environmental protection in GDP, keep the moderate opening to the outside world, optimize the energy consumption structure and realize the upgrading of industrial structure, and comprehensively improve the environmental quality. Enhance the pollution control effect of environmental financial expenditure under open economy.
【作者单位】：重庆大学公共管理学院;重庆师范大学经济与管理学院;
【基金】：中国博士后科学基金面上项目“碳减排与经济增长的最优耦合测度及差别化减排方案设计”(批准号:2012M511898) 重庆市人民政府发展研究中心项目“联动治理农村面源污染推进美丽乡村建设的对策研究”(批准号:2014-ZB-11)
【分类号】：F812.45;X22

【相似文献】