参与式预算技术环节的有效性分析——基于中国地方参与式预算的跨案例比较

发布时间：2018-04-22 02:10

本文选题：参与式预算 + 技术环节　；参考：《经济社会体制比较》2017年05期

【摘要】：公共预算的合法性问题取决于预算决策中的参与技术环节所形成的预算正当性的社会认同,它与后续的预算执行的有效性构成了两个核心支撑点。文章从参与式预算的具体技术环节入手,通过比较上海市浦兴路街道的"自治金协商民意测验分配"与云南省盐津县的"群众参与预算"等案例样本,分析了预算参与代表的选取方法,参与决策过程中的协商技术,以及预算的表决方式的差异。通过比较发现,中国预算改革并不在于预算总量的增加幅度,而是预算的分配如何通过民主参与的技术供给和科学的程序设计,使得民众有机会参与到预算决策当中,从而增强预算的正当性,同时,中国参与式预算中民众参与的一个意义在于"民意可能激活代议制审查功能"。
[Abstract]:The legitimacy of public budget depends on the social identity of budget legitimacy formed by the participation of technical links in budget decision-making. It and the effectiveness of the subsequent budget execution constitute two core supporting points. Starting with the specific technical aspects of participatory budgeting, this paper compares the "autonomous gold consultation poll allocation" in Puxing Road street in Shanghai with the "mass participation budget" in Yanjin County, Yunnan Province, and so on. This paper analyzes the selection method of budget participation representatives, the negotiation technology in the process of participation in decision-making, and the differences of budget voting methods. Through comparison, it is found that China's budget reform does not lie in the increase in the total amount of the budget, but in how the distribution of the budget, through the technical supply of democratic participation and the scientific programming, gives the people the opportunity to participate in the budget decisions. So as to enhance the legitimacy of the budget, at the same time, one of the significance of popular participation in the participatory budget in China is that "public opinion may activate the function of representative censorship".
【作者单位】：复旦大学国际关系与公共事务学院;复旦大学城市治理比较研究中心;
【基金】：2014年国家社科基金一般项目“我国地方政府创新扩展模式研究”(项目编号:14BZZ049)
【分类号】：F812.3

【相似文献】