“以县为主”体制和“新机制”的农村教育财政投入改革绩效评价

发布时间：2018-05-16 17:22

本文选题：农村教育 + 地方财政投入　；参考：《当代财经》2015年12期

【摘要】："以县为主"体制迫使地方政府在教育投入中"尽责",而"新机制"改革增加了地方政府投资教育的经济激励,两次改革都提高了农村教育经费保障水平,取得了一定成效。但是,在"以县为主"体制中,地方政府对教育投入普遍具有"卸责"冲动;而"新机制"改革也存在显著的"挤出效应"。所以,地方教育财政投入的主动性问题并没有得到彻底解决。另外,虽然两次改革消除了地方教育财政投入的"中部凹陷"现象,但最终形成的地方教育财政投入差别也有悖于财政中立性原则。因此,尽快调整地方政府的政绩考核方式,明确划分各级政府的教育投入责任,科学设计有地区差别的教育转移支付制度,仍然是未来农村教育制度改革的重要任务。
[Abstract]:The "county-oriented" system forces local governments to "be responsible" in their educational input, while the "new mechanism" reform has increased the economic incentives for local governments to invest in education, and both reforms have raised the level of rural education funds and achieved certain results. However, in the "county-oriented" system, local governments generally have the impulse of "shirking responsibility" for education investment, and the "new mechanism" reform also has a significant "crowding out effect". Therefore, the initiative of local education financial input has not been completely resolved. In addition, although the two reforms eliminated the "central depression" of the local education financial investment, the difference in the local education financial input was also contrary to the principle of fiscal neutrality. Therefore, it is still an important task for the reform of rural education system in the future to adjust the performance assessment methods of local governments, clearly divide the responsibility of education input of governments at all levels, and scientifically design the education transfer payment system with regional differences.
【作者单位】：山东财经大学经济学院;
【基金】：山东省社科规划研究项目“引领我省产业转型升级的人才建设财政政策研究”(14CJJJ44) 山东省高等学校人文社会科学研究项目“产业升级条件下山东省教育结构优化研究”(J15WB25)
【分类号】：F812.45

【参考文献】