地方政府间财政支出竞争的环境效应研究
发布时间：2019-03-30 17:02
【摘要】：在中国财政分权的制度背景下，地方政府的财权和事权得到下放，财政收支的自主权利日益加强，因此围绕政治晋升的财政支出竞争在全国范围内展开。为了在政治锦标赛中获胜，地方政府通过财政支出决策的策略竞争来争夺有限的社会资源，而这种竞争也会相应带来经济效应和社会效应，其中环境效应是社会效应的最重要组成部分之一。 本文探讨了地方政府间管理类、经济生产类和科教文卫类财政支出竞争对环境质量的影响效应，首先建立了“双维度”标尺竞争的理论框架，并分析了各类支出竞争对环境的影响路径；对支出竞争和环境污染时间变化和空间差异的现状进行概述，并构建了支出竞争的环境效应模型，运用中国省级面板数据进行检验，最终得出结论：管理类支出竞争与经济生产类支出竞争对环境质量有着反向的抑制作用，而科教文卫类支出竞争则有利于改善环境。另外财政支出竞争又因存在“双维度”的特性而影响了环境质量的变化：从时间维度看，支出竞争将经历从“为增长而竞争”到“为和谐而竞争”的转变，从而带来环境质量的改善；从空间维度看，发达地区的支出竞争逐渐转变为以科教文卫类支出竞争为主，环境污染转移带来环境质量的进步，欠发达地区仍然停留在经济生产类支出竞争为主的形态，承接污染转移导致环境污染的进一步恶化。 因此，要针对地方政府间非规范竞争的原因，，增加对地方政府环境保护的政治导向和激励机制，将环境保护纳入政绩考核标准和制度，加强分权体制合理性，这将有利于解决地方政府间环境质量竞争到底。
[Abstract]:Under the background of fiscal decentralization in China, the financial and administrative powers of local governments have been devolved, and the autonomy of fiscal revenue and expenditure has been strengthened day by day. Therefore, the competition of fiscal expenditure around political promotion has been carried out all over the country. In order to win the political championship, local governments compete for limited social resources through the strategic competition of fiscal expenditure decision-making, and this kind of competition will also bring economic and social effects. Among them, the environmental effect is one of the most important components of the social effect. This paper discusses the influence of financial expenditure competition among local governments, economic production and science, education, culture and health on environmental quality. Firstly, the theoretical framework of "two-dimensional" scale competition is established. And analyzed the influence path of all kinds of expenditure competition to the environment; This paper summarizes the present situation of the temporal change and spatial difference of expenditure competition and environmental pollution, and constructs the environmental effect model of expenditure competition, which is tested by using the provincial panel data of China. Finally, it is concluded that the competition of management expenditure and the competition of economic production have a reverse restraining effect on environmental quality, while the competition of expenditure of science, education, culture and health is beneficial to the improvement of environment. In addition, the competition of fiscal expenditure has influenced the change of environmental quality because of the characteristics of "two dimensions": from the perspective of time, the competition of expenditure will experience the transformation from "competition for growth" to "competition for harmony". Thus bring about the improvement of environmental quality; From the spatial dimension, the expenditure competition in developed areas is gradually transformed into the expenditure competition based on science, education, culture and health, and the transfer of environmental pollution brings about the progress of environmental quality. The underdeveloped areas still remain in the form of economic production expenditure competition. Undertaking pollution transfer leads to further deterioration of environmental pollution. Therefore, in view of the reasons of non-standard competition among local governments, we should increase the political orientation and incentive mechanism for environmental protection of local governments, incorporate environmental protection into the standards and systems for assessing political achievements, and strengthen the rationality of the decentralized system. This will help solve the local government environmental quality competition to the end.
【学位授予单位】：暨南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：F812.45
本文编号：2450298
[Abstract]:Under the background of fiscal decentralization in China, the financial and administrative powers of local governments have been devolved, and the autonomy of fiscal revenue and expenditure has been strengthened day by day. Therefore, the competition of fiscal expenditure around political promotion has been carried out all over the country. In order to win the political championship, local governments compete for limited social resources through the strategic competition of fiscal expenditure decision-making, and this kind of competition will also bring economic and social effects. Among them, the environmental effect is one of the most important components of the social effect. This paper discusses the influence of financial expenditure competition among local governments, economic production and science, education, culture and health on environmental quality. Firstly, the theoretical framework of "two-dimensional" scale competition is established. And analyzed the influence path of all kinds of expenditure competition to the environment; This paper summarizes the present situation of the temporal change and spatial difference of expenditure competition and environmental pollution, and constructs the environmental effect model of expenditure competition, which is tested by using the provincial panel data of China. Finally, it is concluded that the competition of management expenditure and the competition of economic production have a reverse restraining effect on environmental quality, while the competition of expenditure of science, education, culture and health is beneficial to the improvement of environment. In addition, the competition of fiscal expenditure has influenced the change of environmental quality because of the characteristics of "two dimensions": from the perspective of time, the competition of expenditure will experience the transformation from "competition for growth" to "competition for harmony". Thus bring about the improvement of environmental quality; From the spatial dimension, the expenditure competition in developed areas is gradually transformed into the expenditure competition based on science, education, culture and health, and the transfer of environmental pollution brings about the progress of environmental quality. The underdeveloped areas still remain in the form of economic production expenditure competition. Undertaking pollution transfer leads to further deterioration of environmental pollution. Therefore, in view of the reasons of non-standard competition among local governments, we should increase the political orientation and incentive mechanism for environmental protection of local governments, incorporate environmental protection into the standards and systems for assessing political achievements, and strengthen the rationality of the decentralized system. This will help solve the local government environmental quality competition to the end.
【学位授予单位】：暨南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：F812.45
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 闫文娟;钟茂初;;中国式财政分权会增加环境污染吗[J];财经论丛;2012年03期
2 钟晓敏;市场化改革中的地方财政竞争[J];财经研究;2004年01期
3 张克中;王娟;崔小勇;;财政分权与环境污染:碳排放的视角[J];中国工业经济;2011年10期
4 傅勇;张晏;;中国式分权与财政支出结构偏向:为增长而竞争的代价[J];管理世界;2007年03期
5 李涛;周业安;;中国地方政府间支出竞争研究——基于中国省级面板数据的经验证据[J];管理世界;2009年02期
6 郭庆旺;贾俊雪;;地方政府间策略互动行为、财政支出竞争与地区经济增长[J];管理世界;2009年10期
7 踪家峰;李蕾;郑敏闽;;中国地方政府间标尺竞争——基于空间计量经济学的分析[J];经济评论;2009年04期
8 李猛;;财政分权与环境污染——对环境库兹涅茨假说的修正[J];经济评论;2009年05期
9 马骏,侯一麟;中国省级预算中的政策过程与预算过程:来自两省的调查[J];经济社会体制比较;2005年05期
10 张恒龙;陈宪;;财政竞争对地方公共支出结构的影响——以中国的招商引资竞争为例[J];经济社会体制比较;2006年06期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 伍文中;政府间财政支出竞争的经济效应研究[D];山东大学;2010年
本文编号：2450298
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/shuishoucaizhenglunwen/2450298.html
