对我国企业并购所得税政策的研究
[Abstract]:M & A has become one of the important ways for enterprises to realize the leapfrog development strategy, and it is also an important way to deepen the supply-side structural reform and adjust the structure in China. The development of M & A market can not be separated from the norms of the system. Although China has established M & A income tax system, but because of the short establishment time, it is still not clear enough and unreasonable. This not only hinders the real mergers and acquisitions for reasonable commercial purposes, but also difficult to limit tax avoidance mergers and acquisitions. As a property right transaction, many taxes will be involved in the process of mergers and acquisitions, among which income tax has the greatest impact. It is of great significance to study the influence of income tax policy on M & A market and how to further improve it in order to realize the upgrading of economic transformation and the improvement of quality and efficiency of enterprises. At the theoretical level, the study of M & A income tax policy is helpful to enrich the theoretical framework system of M & A income tax policy in China, and to provide theoretical reference for further guiding practical problems. At the realistic level, by discussing the shortcomings of M & A income tax policy, and then put forward some suggestions to improve it, which is conducive to promoting the standardization, healthy and rapid development of M & A market in China. After a brief analysis of the evolution of M & A income tax policy and the application of the current income tax policy, this paper explores the existing problems of M & A income tax policy through case analysis, and puts forward some suggestions for improvement. In addition to the first chapter, the other chapters are as follows: the second chapter expounds the relevant theories, such as the principle of tax neutrality, the principle of quantity and energy taxation and the theory of tax avoidance motivation of mergers and acquisitions, which lays a theoretical foundation for the following policy evolution and case analysis. The third chapter briefly analyzes the development course, current policy and application of M & A income tax policy in China. Through quantitative analysis, it is found that the income tax policy plays a weak role in the regional guidance of M & A market, and the introduction of Finance and Taxation [2014] reduces the threshold of acquisition ratio of special mergers and acquisitions, which is helpful for more enterprises to enjoy deferred tax preferential treatment. In order to further promote the development of M & A market, we should improve the current M & A income tax policy in China. In the fourth chapter, through the tax analysis of the listing scheme of petroleum engineering companies, it is pointed out that the current M & A income tax policy has some problems in the aspects of special tax treatment criteria, M & A cost treatment, legislative level and so on. In addition, the income tax policy also has problems in the period of compensation for losses. The fifth chapter is the policy suggestion. In the aspect of optimizing the judgment standard of reasonable commercial purpose, we should formulate quantitative standard on the basis of the existing clause, so that all parties can follow the unified and easy to operate standard at the time of judgment, and the relevant departments can list a variety of judgment cases according to their work experience and on the basis of extensive solicitation of public opinion for reference. In the aspect of judging the criterion of the continuity of owner's rights and interests, the standard of equity payment in the consideration of payment should be reduced; in the aspect of the criterion of continuous judgment of substantive operation, the relative continuity of enterprise operation should be regarded as meeting the conditions; for the acquired enterprise, it is suggested that regardless of whether the transaction it participates in meets the special tax treatment standard, the expenses incurred should be included as capital expenditure and included in the cost of the acquired asset or equity. It is suggested that the legislative level of M & A income tax policy should be gradually improved.
【学位授予单位】:山东大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:F812.42;F271
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 ;企业等社会力量向红十字事业捐赠有关所得税政策问题 琜J];浙江财税与会计;2000年10期
2 田革;企业改组中所得税政策之完善[J];辽宁财税;2003年05期
3 艾予,王映健,英康;上市公司所得税政策的忧思[J];四川预算与会计;1999年02期
4 ;关于纳税人向农村义务教育捐赠有关所得税政策问题[J];税收征纳;2001年09期
5 ;关于完善城镇社会保障体系试点中有关所得税政策问题的通知[J];对外经贸财会;2001年05期
6 王凤山,赵可明;对兼营性外商投资企业所得税政策的辨析[J];涉外税务;2002年12期
7 曾淑平;缩小与发达地区差距的所得税政策选择[J];湖南农业大学学报(社会科学版);2005年05期
8 陈金池;宋村杰;;让所得税政策成为国家促进企业自主创新的主动力[J];现代经济探讨;2006年10期
9 蒋新美;;制定非营利组织所得税政策应注意的问题初探[J];网络财富;2008年09期
10 吴俊龙;胡志勇;;论我国公司所得税政策效果及调整方向[J];福建论坛(人文社会科学版);2012年08期
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 ;关于企业参与政府统一组织的棚户区改造有关企业所得税政策问题的通知[N];中国税务报;2013年
2 ;关于中非发展基金有限公司继续执行有关企业所得税政策的通知[N];中国税务报;2013年
3 北京鑫税广通税务师事务所税务技术中心主任 徐贺;并购重组的企业所得税政策要点分析及评价[N];财会信报;2013年
4 ;关于中国老龄事业发展基金会等8家单位捐赠所得税政策问题的通知[N];中国财经报;2006年
5 特约记者 罗绮萍;受惠所得税政策 中行盈利或将调整[N];21世纪经济报道;2006年
6 ;关于电网企业接受用户资产有关企业所得税政策问题的通知[N];中国税务报;2011年
7 记者 庞东梅;两部门明确上海自贸区部分企业所得税政策[N];金融时报;2013年
8 ;关于中国教育发展基金会捐赠所得税政策问题的通知[N];中国财经报;2006年
9 黎显扬;2012年下半年企业所得税政策盘点[N];海峡财经导报;2013年
10 黎显扬;2013年上半年企业所得税政策盘点[N];海峡财经导报;2013年
相关硕士学位论文 前8条
1 崔文馨;境外投资企业所得税政策的研究[D];大连海事大学;2015年
2 侯超;公司并购重组的所得税政策研究[D];山东大学;2016年
3 解素艳;所得税政策的就业效应研究[D];浙江财经大学;2017年
4 刘嘉;对我国企业并购所得税政策的研究[D];山东大学;2017年
5 张圆;我国律师业所得税政策研究[D];上海交通大学;2009年
6 胡阳;企业重组企业所得税政策问题及其完善[D];浙江财经大学;2014年
7 刘韶华;公平视角下促进区域经济协调发展的企业所得税政策取向研究[D];内蒙古农业大学;2014年
8 张佳琦;吉利境外并购沃尔沃的所得税政策研究[D];湖南大学;2014年
,本文编号:2500816
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/shuishoucaizhenglunwen/2500816.html