行政复议与行政诉讼衔接机制探讨
本文关键词：行政复议与行政诉讼衔接机制探讨，由笔耕文化传播整理发布。
行政复议与行政诉讼衔接机制探讨
行政复议与行政诉讼衔接机制探讨
行政复议、行政诉讼在化解行政争议,推动社会和谐中发挥着重要作用。在传统上,一般认为我国的行政复议制度是一种行政的内部纠错机制,据此建立了书面审理、一次复议、不停止执行等一系列行政性的争议解决机制。《行政复议法》颁布10多年来,行政复议制度显示了5大弊端,限制了这一制度功能的发挥。关于行政复议究竟该定位于监督还是救济,学界看法不一。本文认为我国的行政复议应从行政机关的内部纠错机制的定位转变为行政争议的救济机制,明确行政复议的救济功能,应建立相对独立、中立的行政复议机关,引进司法化的处理争议模式,同时保证行政复议的公正和效率。本文从英国、美国、法国、韩国四国的行政复议与行政诉讼关系浅析浅析入手,结合行政权与司法权的关系浅析浅析,探索我国应该建立的衔接模式。在目前行政争议多发的情况下,如何做好行政复议和行政诉讼这两种救济方式的衔接,处理好行政争议行政解决与司法解决的关系,共同保护公民的合法权益是法学理论研究和制度设计的重要课题。本文从理论和实践上浅析浅析二者的性质和关系,浅析浅析二者的衔接模式,并对现在正在各地试点的行政复议委员会模式提出质疑。本文认为应针对我国国情,对现行的行政复议制度进行改造,建立我国相对中立的行政复议制度,让的行政争议通过行政复议途径得到化解,让这一制度成为化解行政争议的主渠道。同时确立司法终局裁决制度,让行政争议能够接受司法的终局审查,克服单纯行政解决方式可能带来的“官官相互”的弊端,避开行政争议解决的“体制内循环”,保障行政争议的最终司法处理。应当做好行政复议与行政诉讼技术层面的衔接,比如行政复议和行政诉讼的提起时间的衔接,受案范围的衔接、行政复议结果的效力不足等。通过一系列制度的设置,建立我国的行政争议解决模式,让行政争议能够按照正常的链条得到解决,避开因为行政争议引发社会动荡。
【Abstract】 Administrative reconsideration, administrative litigation in resolving administrative disputes and promote social harmony plays an important role. Traditionally, the general view that the administrative review of an administrative system is an internal error correction mechanism whereby the establishment of a written hearing, a review, do not stop the implementation of a series of administrative dispute resolution mechanism. "Administrative Reconsideration Law" promulgated 10 years, the administrative review system shows the 5 major drawbacks limit the functionality of the system to play. What about the administrative review with the Authority or the positioning of relief, academics are divided. This paper argues that the administrative reconsideration of the executive from the positioning of the internal error correction mechanisms into relief the administrative dispute mechanism, a clear function of the administrative review of relief, should establish independent, neutral agency administrative review, the introduction of judicial disputes of the treatment model while ensuring fairness and efficiency of the administrative review.This article from the UK, U.S., France, South Korea four countries between administrative reconsideration and administrative litigation analysis, combining the executive power and judicial power relationship analysis, to explore the convergence of pattern should be established. Multiple administrative dispute in the present case, how to do administrative reconsideration and administrative litigation convergence of these two remedies, handle the administration to resolve administrative disputes and judicial settlement of the relations, and jointly protect the legitimate rights and interests of citizens and the legal theory of system design an important issue. In this paper, both theory and practice of the nature and relations of both the convergence model, and the pilot is now all over the Administrative Review Committee to be questioned.This paper argues that China’s national conditions should be targeted on the current administrative review system reform, the establishment of the relative neutrality of the administrative review system, while establishing the final award of the administrative judge of judicial system, so that more channels of administrative disputes be resolved through administrative review, Let this system has become the main channel to resolve administrative disputes.At the same time a final decision to establish justice system so that the administrative dispute to accept the final judicial review of administrative solutions to overcome the pure potential "between government officials," the defects, to avoid the administrative dispute resolution "system within the cycle," the ultimate protection of administrative disputes judicial treatment. Shall do the administrative reconsideration and administrative litigation, the interface between the technical level, such as administrative reconsideration and administrative proceedings instituted time convergence, case range of convergence, the validity of the results of administrative review problems. Through a series of system settings, the establishment of China’s administrative dispute resolution model, so that the administrative dispute can be resolved in accordance with the normal chain, avoid the administrative dispute lead to social unrest.
【关键词】 行政争议； 行政复议； 行政诉讼； 制度衔接；【Key words】 administrative disputes； administrative reconsideration； administrative litigation； reconsideration litigation； convergence of systems；
更多论文推荐: 各专业论文 海量论文下载
本文关键词：行政复议与行政诉讼衔接机制探讨，由笔耕文化传播整理发布。
，本文编号：119112
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/zhengwuguanli/119112.html
