制约与监督：高校行政权力的控制机制研究

发布时间：2018-02-05 00:41

本文关键词： 高校行政权力控制机制权力制约权力监督腐败　出处：《杭州师范大学》2015年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：高校是由国家法律授权的特殊行政权力主体,近年来已成为行政管理学重要研究对象。首先,高校隶属于政府,政府又对高校实行行政管理,这使得高校相对于其他行政机关而言更具封闭性,容易造成监督乏力;其次,高校以行政、学术二元权力结构为主,且行政权力主体又具有“管控”与“服务”的双重身份,形成了集中型管理体制,容易导致失衡。实践表明,高校已成为腐败犯罪新的高发区。这无疑与高校行政权力控制机制存在的缺陷有着一定关联,而目前该领域的理论研究较少。因此,在全面推进国家治理体系和治理能力现代化的背景下,研究高校行政权力的控制机制,已成为亟需解决且极富现实意义的重要课题。基于对国内外相关文献的梳理,提出了行政权力的两种控制方式:权力制约与权力监督。并从权力主客体关系、权力配置方式、权力运行机制和责任追究形式四个方面比较了两者的差异:权力制约研究权力系统内部的力量,是以分权为前提的一种双向约束和牵制关系,由于所有权力主体都参与到整个权力运行过程,在责任追究上其需共同承担直接责任;而权力监督研究权力主体的外部力量对权力主体的监控和督促,是以授权为前提的单向关系,由于其只覆盖权力运行过程中的某个环节,在责任追究上只需承担间接责任。高校行政权力控制是一种特殊形式的权力控制,具有不同于其他行政权力控制的特点,经过初步考察,文章提出高校行政权力制约与权力监督具有建设趋于制度化、监督主体多元化、制约运行非制衡性等特点。根据对不同建制主体制定的高校行政控权制度的分析,指出当前高校行政的行政权力制约机制和行政权力监督机制。在此基础上,进一步地剖析了其特点与缺陷。根据对若干高校干部腐败案例的剖析,提出权力的集权式配置造成各权力主体的独立性缺失、各权力主体之间缺乏分权制衡、各权力主体的权责不清和权力外部监督弱化虚化等造成了权力制约监督的缺失和高校行政权力的失范,甚至导致权力腐败。基于上述高校行政权力控制机制的理论与现实分析,最后提出了完善分工合作、权责统一的行政班子内部制约机制,健全校内不同行政权力主体之间的权力制衡机制,建构高校、教育部门、检察机关之间的协同监督机制和建立多方参与的全程监督机制等重要对策。
[Abstract]:Colleges and universities are the subject of special administrative power authorized by the state law. In recent years, they have become an important research object of administrative management. Firstly, colleges and universities are subordinate to the government, and the government carries out administrative management on colleges and universities. This makes colleges and universities more closed than other administrative organs, easy to cause weak supervision; Secondly, the administrative and academic dualistic power structure in colleges and universities, and the administrative power subject has the dual identity of "control" and "service", forming a centralized management system, easy to lead to imbalance. Practice shows. Colleges and universities have become a new high incidence area of corruption crime, which is undoubtedly related to the defects of the administrative power control mechanism in colleges and universities, but there are few theoretical studies in this field at present. Under the background of comprehensively promoting the modernization of national governance system and governance ability, this paper studies the control mechanism of administrative power in colleges and universities. It has become an important topic which needs to be solved and has great practical significance. Based on the combing of relevant literature at home and abroad, this paper puts forward two kinds of control ways of administrative power: power restriction and power supervision, and from the relationship between subject and object of power. The power allocation mode, the power operation mechanism and the responsibility investigation form have compared the difference between the four aspects: the power restriction studies the power system internal strength, is a kind of bidirectional restraint and the restraint relation which takes the separation of powers as the premise. Because all the power subjects are involved in the whole process of power operation, they should bear the direct responsibility in the responsibility investigation. Power supervision studies the supervision and supervision of power subjects by external forces, which is a one-way relationship based on authorization, because it covers only one link in the process of power operation. Administrative power control in colleges and universities is a special form of power control, which is different from other administrative power control characteristics, after preliminary investigation. The article points out that the construction of administrative power restriction and power supervision in colleges and universities tends to be institutionalized, and the main body of supervision is diversified. Based on the analysis of the system of administrative control made by different institutions of higher learning, this paper points out the current administrative power restriction mechanism and administrative power supervision mechanism in colleges and universities. Based on the analysis of some cases of corruption of cadres in colleges and universities, the author points out that the centralization of power allocation results in the lack of independence of each power subject and the lack of separation of powers and checks and balances among the power subjects. The lack of power restriction supervision and the loss of administrative power in colleges and universities are caused by the unclear powers and responsibilities of the power subjects and the weakening of the power external supervision. Even lead to power corruption. Based on the above theoretical and practical analysis of the control mechanism of administrative power in colleges and universities, finally put forward a perfect division of work, the unity of power and responsibility of the internal control mechanism of the administrative team. It is necessary to perfect the power balance mechanism among different administrative power subjects, to construct the cooperative supervision mechanism among universities, educational departments and procuratorial organs, and to establish a multi-participation supervision mechanism in the whole process.
【学位授予单位】：杭州师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D630.9

【相似文献】