上访的“冤屈”、稳定的逻辑与治理的两难

发布时间：2018-02-28 14:01

  本文关键词： 信访制度 权威类型 稳定的逻辑 选官机制 中国国家治理 中央与地方关系　出处：《浙江社会科学》2017年07期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：电影《我不是潘金莲》可从诸多角度加以解读,最直接也最核心的困惑或许是要追问,一桩小事为何能够借助上访搅动得整个体制不得安宁。影片借此折射出的是古往今来中国国家治理逻辑中一直存在的三个相互勾连的根本问题。首先是稳定的逻辑,其内在于天命观和追求绩效合法性的卡理斯玛权威之中,因此对于统治风险高度重视。其次,维持稳定借助的是乌纱帽的控制,即中央集权体制下自上而下的选官机制。最终,二者背后贯穿的是大国治理中权威体制与有效治理之间的两难选择,是中央集权与地方分权间一收就死、一放就乱的根本困境。上访的难题正源于这三个环环相扣的问题。走出这一困境是一个系统工程,仍需不断探索。
[Abstract]:The film "I am not Pan Jinlian" can be interpreted from many angles. Perhaps the most direct and central puzzle is to ask. Why can a small matter stir up the whole system with the help of a petition? the film reflects the three fundamental problems that have existed in the logic of Chinese state governance throughout the ages. The first is the logic of stability. It lies in the view of destiny and the authority of Carlisma, which pursues the legitimacy of performance, so it attaches great importance to the risk of rule. Secondly, the maintenance of stability depends on the control of the black yarn hat, that is, the mechanism of selecting officials from the top down under the centralization system. Behind the two is the dilemma between the authoritative system and effective governance in the governance of great powers, which is the death of centralization and decentralization as soon as they are collected. The fundamental dilemma of chaos in the first place. The problem of petition is derived from these three interlocking problems. Getting out of this dilemma is a system engineering and still needs to be explored.
【作者单位】： 中央党校政法部;
【分类号】：D630;J905
，

本文编号：1547592