网络反腐事件中政府回应行为研究

发布时间：2018-03-09 21:58

本文选题：政府回应　切入点：网络反腐　出处：《兰州大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：网络反腐是网络时代新兴的一种反腐败形式,然而由于其政府回应行为存在差异化特征,对其反腐实效造成了严重制约。因此,对网络反腐事件中政府回应行为是什么,且为什么存在差异,应该采取哪些措施改善现状,成为亟待研究的学术问题。通过对前人研究和相关理论进行梳理,以2008年到2017年间189个网络反腐案例的实践情况为基础,本文将这一领域的政府回应行为作为研究对象,对其概念、行为呈现、特点、现状和作用进行描述,继而阐释其产生逻辑,探究其影响因素,构建模型进行假设检验,并提出改善思路。从动机、参与者、内容和作用等四个维度考虑,可以将网络反腐事件中的政府回应行为划分为三类:调查处理类、否认澄清类和周边信息类。调查处理类政府回应主要指对事件进行调查处理的官方反腐机构所提供有关事件处理情况;否认澄清类政府回应主要是指网络曝光的腐败线索所涉及官员和其所在政府部门对于这些信息的辩解、承认或者其他表示;周边信息类政府回应主要是除了对事件进行调查处理的纪律部门,从其他政府渠道产生的有关政府回应信息。这一领域内政府回应行为的动机复杂多样,权威性存在差异,呈现出较为明显的互联网特征,且存在一些被动性,对于事件演化有着关键作用。以政府回应行为用时作为观测指标,可以发现其现状差强人意,但呈现出积极的发展趋势。在网络反腐事件中,调查处理类政府回应行为的产生是政府系统和网络环境内外部共同作用的结果,据此提出了研究假设,认为政治领导、政府信息公开程度、涉事官员的行政职级、涉事官员的职务、线索曝光平台、爆料人形式、信息化程度等可能是其影响因素。通过二元Logistic模型进行数据分析发现,网络反腐事件中政治领导、涉事官员的行政职级、涉事官员是否担任部门正职领导职位、爆料人是否实名对政府回应行为用时皆有显著影响,然而政府部门的信息公开程度、信息化程度的影响并不显著。由此可知,网络反腐事件中政府回应行为是外部压力如网络舆论、爆料人和内部动力即政治领导共同推动的,且带有较强的“人治”色彩,涉事官员的行政职级和具体职务也可能对其产生消极影响。为改善网络反腐事件中的政府回应现状,应建立和完善有关制度法规、组织机构、信息平台和行政文化,并且正确引导网络公民政治参与。推进网络反腐的规范化,可以从改善其政府回应行为入手。此外,后续研究和实践可以深入考察政府回应行为的内容质量,探讨互联网与政府回应行为之间的联系,并将政府回应向常态化方向发展。
[Abstract]:Network anti-corruption is a new form of anti-corruption in the network age. However, because of the different characteristics of government response, it has a serious restriction on the effectiveness of anti-corruption. Therefore, what is the government response to the network anti-corruption? And why there are differences, what measures should be taken to improve the status quo, become an urgent academic problem. Through the previous research and related theories, based on the practice of 189 network anti-corruption cases from 2008 to 2017. This paper takes the government response behavior in this field as the research object, describes its concept, behavior presentation, characteristics, current situation and function, then explains its producing logic, explores its influencing factors, and constructs a model for hypothesis testing. Considering the four dimensions of motivation, participant, content and function, the government response behavior in the network anti-corruption incident can be divided into three categories: investigation and handling. (B) denial of clarification and peripheral information. The response of the Government to the investigation and handling category refers mainly to the handling of the incident provided by the official anti-corruption agency involved in the investigation and handling of the incident; Denial of clarification of government responses mainly refers to officials involved in online revelations of corruption clues and their government departments' justifications, acknowledgements or other indications of such information; Peripheral information government responses are mainly related government response information from other government sources, in addition to disciplinary departments that investigate and handle incidents. In this area, the motives for government responses are complex and varied, and there are differences in authority. It shows obvious Internet features and some passivity, which plays a key role in the evolution of events. Taking the time of government response as an observation indicator, we can find that the current situation is not satisfactory. However, there is a positive development trend. In the network anti-corruption incident, the emergence of the response behavior of investigation and handling of government is the result of the internal and external interaction of government system and network environment. Based on this, the research hypotheses are put forward, and political leaders are considered as political leaders. The degree of disclosure of government information, the administrative rank of the officials involved, the position of the officials involved, the platform for exposure of clues, the form of the source and the degree of information may be the influencing factors. Through the data analysis of the binary Logistic model, it is found that, In the network anti-corruption incident, the political leaders, the administrative rank of the officials involved, whether the officials concerned hold the leading positions in the departments, and whether the actual names of the informants have a significant impact on the use of the government's response behavior, however, the extent to which the information of the government departments is made public. The influence of information level is not obvious. From this, we can see that the government's response behavior in the network anti-corruption incident is promoted by external pressure such as network public opinion, whistle-blowers and internal power, that is, political leadership, and has a strong "rule by man" color. In order to improve the current situation of the government response to the network anti-corruption incident, it is necessary to establish and improve relevant systems, regulations, organizations, information platforms and administrative culture. And correctly guide the political participation of network citizens. To promote the standardization of network anti-corruption, we can start with improving the government response behavior. In addition, further research and practice can further investigate the content quality of government response behavior. To explore the relationship between the Internet and government response, and to normalize government response.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D630

【参考文献】