基层创新社会治理的建邺探索
本文选题:社会治理 切入点:政府职能 出处:《东南大学》2016年硕士论文
【摘要】:随着中国改革开放的进程不断加快,市场经济的发展壮大,人民群众生活水平日益提高,如何跨过“中等收入陷阱”,如何调和治理体制与经济发展的冲突成为热点话题。日渐增长的物质消费催生了高层级的消费需求,出现了很多多样化、个性化的需求,而传统的供给方式不能满足这些新需求。一方面需要高屋建瓴,加强顶层设计,通过深化改革,切实推进国家治理体系和治理能力现代化,实现政府治理和社会自我调节、居民自治良性互动,并从改进社会治理方式、激发社会组织活力等方面进行探索;另一方面则需要发挥基层首创精神,结合现代治理理念与自身实际,积极开展试点,形成具体经验。而对社会建设层面来说,政府要避免定位为全能政府,实现职能由“管控为主”转向“服务为主”,引导多元主体参与社会治理,实现多元共治,最后达到“善治”目的。本研究首先,基于社会转型发展的现实背景,从社会管理向社会治理转变入手,着重分析了社会管理、社会治理的基本概念以及两者之间的区别,明确了我国开展社会治理的现实需求及发展方向。其次,结合建邺实际,在分析建邺区2009-2012年、2013-2015年两个阶段的社会管理创新改革的做法和成效基础上,对照社会治理未来发展趋势,指出建邺现在社会治理架构还存在的问题与不足。第三,通过总结对比上海、深圳、成都、武汉国内先进城区及新加坡在社会治理方面进行的有益探索,在社会治理架构、社会组织建设、基层居民自治等方面汲取有益经验。最后,在分析国内外经验启示的基础上,对比存在的问题不足,分析下一步建邺社会治理创新应在形成开放决策机制、丰富信息化手段、厘清区街社区职责、激发社会组织活力,健全矛盾调处机制方面寻求突破。通过研究建邺创新社会治理的实践探索及发展路径,引申到当前我国社会治理的发展模式,就基层政府如何推动政府角色转变、促进社会组织的培育发展、倡导常态化、个性化的基层自治、营造法治、和谐的社会氛围方面有所探讨,希望能通过本文的研究能对有效推动社会治理创新有所贡献。
[Abstract]:With the continuous acceleration of the process of reform and opening up in China and the development of the market economy, the standard of living of the people is improving day by day. How to cross the "middle-income trap" and how to reconcile the conflict between governance system and economic development has become a hot topic. The growing material consumption has given birth to high-level consumption demand, and there has been a lot of diversified and individualized demand. On the one hand, we need to build a strategic position, strengthen the top-level design, promote the modernization of the country's governance system and governance capacity through deepening reform, and realize government governance and social self-regulation. On the other hand, we need to give play to the grass-roots initiative spirit, combine the modern governance concept with their own reality, and actively carry out pilot projects, and improve the way of social governance and stimulate the vitality of social organizations, on the other hand, we need to give full play to the spirit of initiative at the grass-roots level. For the social construction, the government should avoid being an all-powerful government, change its functions from "management and control" to "service", guide the pluralistic subjects to participate in social governance, and realize pluralistic co-governance. Finally, the purpose of "good governance" is achieved. First of all, based on the realistic background of social transformation and development, this study focuses on the analysis of social management, the basic concepts of social governance and the differences between them, starting with the transformation from social management to social governance. This paper clarifies the realistic demand and development direction of developing social governance in China. Secondly, combined with the actual situation of Jianye, it analyzes the practice and effect of the social management innovation reform in Jianye District 2009-2012 and 2013-2015. With reference to the future development trend of social governance, the problems and shortcomings of the current social governance structure of Jianye are pointed out. Third, by summing up and comparing Shanghai, Shenzhen, Chengdu, Wuhan advanced urban areas and Singapore in the social governance aspects of beneficial exploration, in the social governance structure, social organization construction, grass-roots residents autonomy and other aspects of the beneficial experience. Finally, on the basis of analysis of domestic and foreign experience inspiration, Compared with the existing problems, this paper analyzes that the next step of social governance innovation in Jianye should be to form an open decision-making mechanism, enrich the means of information, clarify the responsibilities of the district community, and stimulate the vitality of social organizations. By studying the practical exploration and development path of building Ye and innovating social governance, we can extend the current development model of social governance in our country, and discuss how the grass-roots government can promote the change of government's role. In order to promote the cultivation and development of social organizations, advocate regularization, individualized grass-roots autonomy, build the rule of law and harmonious social atmosphere, we hope to contribute to the effective promotion of social governance innovation through the study of this paper.
【学位授予单位】:东南大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:D630
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李鑫;;新加坡社区管理服务“3P模式”研究及其启示[J];求索;2015年08期
2 刘家用;;武汉百步亭创新社区治理的主要做法和经验启示[J];中国管理信息化;2015年15期
3 王名;蔡志鸿;王春婷;;社会共治:多元主体共同治理的实践探索与制度创新[J];中国行政管理;2014年12期
4 乔耀章;;从“治理社会”到社会治理的历史新穿越——中国特色社会治理要论:融国家治理政府治理于社会治理之中[J];学术界;2014年10期
5 郑家杰;;城市社区治理创新模式研究——以百步亭社区治理模式为例[J];长沙大学学报;2014年04期
6 魏治勋;;“善治”视野中的国家治理能力及其现代化[J];法学论坛;2014年02期
7 周红云;;从社会管理走向社会治理:概念、逻辑、原则与路径[J];团结;2014年01期
8 李慧凤;;制度结构、行为主体与基层政府治理[J];南京社会科学;2014年02期
9 邵光学;刘娟;;从“社会管理”到“社会治理”——浅谈中国共产党执政理念的新变化[J];学术论坛;2014年02期
10 刘太刚;;公共管理之器、术、道——需求溢出理论的公共管理资源论和公共管理学知识体系论[J];江苏行政学院学报;2013年06期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 叶泽;;以群众工作统揽社会管理创新工作[N];中国组织人事报;2013年
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 孔娜娜;行动者、关系与过程:基层社会治理的结构性转换[D];华中师范大学;2012年
相关硕士学位论文 前4条
1 李若;多元共治视域下城市社区民主自治的问题与因应研究[D];浙江大学;2014年
2 郑容;成都市锦江区社会管理创新研究[D];西南交通大学;2013年
3 李兴成;中国地方政府提升治理能力研究[D];重庆大学;2013年
4 杨璐璐;新公共服务:超越新公共管理的社会治理模式[D];河南大学;2010年
,本文编号:1679561
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/zhengwuguanli/1679561.html