回应式议程设置模式——基于中国公共政策转型一类案例的分析

发布时间：2018-05-15 12:18

本文选题：回应式议程设置 + 公共决策质量　；参考：《政治学研究》2017年03期

【摘要】：回应式议程设置是指政府在短时间内将"议程设置"作为回应社会需求、或处理某一突发事件与社会问题的工具。近年来,回应式议程设置已逐渐成为中国政府公共议程设置过程的常态。在回应式议程设置模式下,社会问题步入议题合法化的过程被政府压缩或精简,社会焦点事件的发生方式和剧烈程度对进入政策议程的重要性往往超过了政策议题本身内在的重要性。政府议题选择更符合公众议程的偏好排序,能够及时回应公众的需求,契合了新时代的治国理政观。但由于公众偏好容易受到短期社会焦点事件的影响而呈现不稳定性,过度依赖公众偏好也隐含着议程设置理性科学分析不够、不利于政府主导能力的培养,甚至有可能导致事实上的无效回应等问题。加强政府决策自主性,对公众需求进行适当引导是防止回应式议程设置模式持续固化的有效措施。
[Abstract]:Response agenda setting means that the government takes "agenda setting" as a tool to respond to social needs or to deal with a certain emergency and social problems in a short period of time. In recent years, responsive agenda setting has gradually become the norm in the process of public agenda setting in Chinese government. Under the responsive agenda setting model, the process of legalizing social issues has been compressed or streamlined by the government. The mode and intensity of social focus events often outweigh the intrinsic importance of policy issues to enter the policy agenda. The choice of government issues is more in line with the preferences of the public agenda, and can respond to the needs of the public in a timely manner, which is in line with the new era of governance. However, due to the instability of public preference due to short-term social focus events, excessive reliance on public preference implies that the rational scientific analysis of agenda setting is not enough, which is not conducive to the cultivation of the leading ability of the government. It may even lead to problems such as de facto ineffective responses. Strengthening the autonomy of government decision-making and guiding the public demand are effective measures to prevent the sustained solidification of responsive agenda setting mode.
【作者单位】：清华大学公共管理学院;
【基金】：国家自然科学基金重大研究计划“新时期中国特色应急管理体系的顶层设计和模式重构”(91224009);国家自然科学基金重点项目“基于若干领域政策实践的中国公共决策模式及其现代化路径研究”(71233005)子课题八“中国公共决策模式选择研究”的研究成果
【分类号】：D63

【相似文献】