环境维权的二元形态差异:生活的政治与对话的政治——基于癌症村和厦门PX项目的案例

发布时间：2018-06-03 18:46

本文选题：环境维权 + 生活政治　；参考：《江苏社会科学》2017年06期

【摘要】：基于两个癌症村与厦门PX项目的样本数据,揭示出环境维权存在明显的二元形态差异,前者表现为生活的政治形态,后者表现对话的政治形态。生活的政治将政治权利当成维护自身利益的工具,价值理性淡薄,行动边界外溢,行动策略较为极端,互动协商效果较差;对话的政治虽也基于自身利益视角,但已关注到政治权利本身的价值,局中人理性控制了行动的边界和方式,取得较好的互动协商结果。生态政治在中国已经兴起,但存在明显的地域差异和环境维权的形态差异,这要求我们要致力于找寻现行经济结构(工业主义生产模式)和社会结构(现代性下传统社会的解体)引致的环境问题(包括环境问题引发的社会问题)的多样政治处方。
[Abstract]:Based on the sample data of two cancer villages and Xiamen PX project, it is revealed that there are obvious differences in binary forms of environmental rights protection, the former being the political form of life and the latter showing the political form of dialogue. The politics of life regards political rights as a tool to safeguard their own interests, with weak value rationality, overflowing boundaries of action, extreme action strategies and poor results of interactive negotiation. Although the politics of dialogue is also based on the perspective of self-interest, However, the value of political rights has been paid attention to. The people in the bureau control the boundary and mode of action rationally and obtain better interactive negotiation results. Ecological politics has emerged in China, but there are obvious regional differences and differences in the form of environmental rights. This requires us to seek the various political prescriptions for the environmental problems (including the social problems caused by the environmental problems) caused by the current economic structure (industrialist production model) and social structure (the disintegration of the traditional society under the modernity).
【作者单位】：苏州大学政治与公共管理学院;江苏省"新型城镇化与社会治理"协同创新中心;
【基金】：江苏社会科学青年基金项目“全国百位优秀县委书记个体特征、行动策略与行动绩效研究”(项目号:16ZZC001)阶段性成果江苏“新型城镇化与社会治理”协同创新中心、江苏省高校优秀教学团队和江苏省高校优势学科建设工程项目资助
【分类号】：D630

【相似文献】