社会组织与政策协商:多元主义与法团主义之辩

发布时间：2018-06-10 15:17

本文选题：社会组织 + 政策协商　；参考：《浙江学刊》2017年01期

【摘要】：随着大量社会组织的产生,学界对政府和社会组织的关系性质是多元主义的还是国家法团主义乃至非制度化的附庸庇护关系展开了激烈的争论。但目前为止。多数是基于比较个案研究而且采取了结构性的研究视角。基于北京大学公民社会研究中心的三省市社会组织调查数据,本文采取了定量的方法并从政策制定的视角来检验这一争论。通过分析,本文发现有近十分之一的社会组织能成功影响政府政策,但政策影响更多是通过政府主动咨询以及社会组织自身资源而产生的,换而言之,法团主义和多元主义假设得到了支持,接近社会法团主义模式。
[Abstract]:With the emergence of a large number of social organizations, there has been a heated debate among scholars on whether the nature of the relationship between the government and social organizations is pluralistic, national corporatism or even non-institutionalized vassal asylum relationship. But so far Most are based on comparative case studies and take a structural perspective. Based on the survey data of social organizations in the three provinces and cities of the Center for Civil Society Studies of Peking University, this paper adopts a quantitative method and examines this argument from the perspective of policy formulation. Through analysis, it is found that nearly 1/10 of the social organizations can successfully influence government policies, but the policy impact is mostly caused by the active consultation of the government and the resources of the social organizations themselves. In other words, The supposition of corporatism and pluralism is supported and close to the mode of social corporatism.
【作者单位】：北京大学政府管理学院;北京大学国家治理协同创新中心;北京大学公民社会研究中心;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目“基于国家能力理论视角的国家治理能力现代化研究”(项目编号:14BZZ044)
【分类号】：D632.9

【相似文献】