社会组织在推进国家治理现代化中的角色定位研究

发布时间：2018-06-11 18:53

本文选题：社会组织 + 国家治理现代化　；参考：《河南大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：“推进国家治理体系和治理能力现代化”是党中央在新时期内面对社会经济的快速发展提出的全新的总目标总任务。它的提出带来了治理理念的变革,标志着我国将逐步转变一元主导的政府管理模式,加快建立多元为中心的社会治理模式。在推进实现国家治理现代化目标的进程中,社会组织作为国家治理的多元主体之一发挥着重要的作用。本文的兴趣点是在推进国家治理现代化的大背景下,将社会学中的角色理论引入对社会组织的研究,通过对比新时期下社会组织的角色期望与现实体制下的角色实践间的差距,找出社会组织发展困境的深层次原因。社会组织是组成公民社会的基本主体,并与政府部门有着千丝万缕的联系,具有服务和倡导功能。本文在对社会组织相关概念介绍和对社会组织分类的基础上,结合国内外研究成果,对社会组织与公民社会及政府间的关系进行论述,并概括总结了我国社会组织发展的现状。社会转型期以来,中国的社会组织迅猛发展。不但在数量、发育水平上不断提高,而且不断发展形成一种集体行动和互动的整体性、结构化的力量。新时期下,为推进国家治理现代化进程,必须加快重组国家治理体系,实现国家治理体系的科学化、民主化、法治化;必须重视国家治理能力的提升,提高政府公信力,加强社会多元力量的协调合作,注重国家治理“软能力”的培养。国家治理现代化理念的提出加剧了社会转型,推进了政府职能转变,带来了公民意识以及公民社会的成长,为社会组织的发展提供了新的历史契机。新时期下由于社会转型的加速带来了政府与公民需求的不断发展,从而对社会组织又有了新的角色期望。从政府的角度来看,社会组织不仅是政府改革的催化剂,公共服务的提供者,社会问题的“减震器”,而且变成了公民政治参与的载体。从公民的角度来看,社会组织不仅发挥着社会服务的基础性功能,更是社会自治的推动者,政府权力的制约者,公共政策的参与者,弱势群体的“保护伞”,公共精神的倡导者,等等。国家治理现代化背景下,政府与公民对社会组织给予了很大的期望,但在其实践过程中,却面临着诸多困境,包括自身能力不足,行业分类不均衡,尤其是倡导型社会组织的缺失,大量弱势“草根”组织存在于法外环境中等。究其原因,主要是社会组织存在的空间是国家让渡出来的,天然弱势;并且在“党政一体”的体制下利益传输机制的中国模式阻碍了社会组织倡导性功能的发挥;而国家政策的变动与现行社会组织相关行政法规的冲突也造成社会组织自身发展的矛盾。因此,为确保社会组织走出角色困境,发挥服务与倡导功能,必须从加快转变观念,健全社会组织利益传输机制,优化社会组织发展的法律制度环境,加强社会组织自身能力建设等方面进行。国家治理现代化理念奠定了社会组织发展的制度基础,而社会组织的发展又进一步促进国家治理现代化目标的实现,二者之间互动双赢。
[Abstract]:"Promoting the national governance system and the modernization of governance ability" is the new total goal of the Party Central Committee to face the rapid development of the social economy in the new period. Its proposal brings about the reform of the governance concept, which indicates that China will gradually change the government management mode dominated by the one yuan, and speed up the establishment of a multicultural social governance. In the process of promoting the goal of realizing the modernization of national governance, the social organization plays an important role as one of the multiple subjects of national governance. The interest point of this article is to introduce the role theory of sociology into the research of social organization under the background of promoting the modernization of national governance and to compare the society in the new period. The difference between the role of the organization and the practice of the role in the real system is expected to find out the deep reasons for the development of social organizations. The social organization is the basic body of the civil society, and has countless connections with the government departments, and has the functions of service and advocacy. This article introduces related concepts and social organizations to social organizations. On the basis of the classification, the relationship between social organizations and civil society and the government is discussed in combination with the research results at home and abroad, and the status of the development of social organizations in China is summarized and summarized. Since the period of social transformation, the social organization of China has developed rapidly. Not only in quantity but also in the development of social development, the development of social organization has been continuously developed and developed to form a kind of collective. In the new period, in order to promote the process of national governance and modernization, we must accelerate the restructuring of the national governance system, realize the scientific, democratic and legal system of the national governance system, and should pay more attention to the promotion of the national governance capacity, the government's credibility, and the coordination and cooperation of the social pluralistic forces. The idea of state governance "soft ability" has intensified the social transformation, promoted the transformation of the government's functions, brought about citizen consciousness and the growth of civil society, and provided a new historical opportunity for the development of social organization. From the point of view of the government, social organizations are not only the catalyst of government reform, the providers of public services, the "shock absorbers" of social problems, but also the carrier of civil political participation. From the angle of citizens, social organizations not only play the basis of social services. The basic function is the promoter of the social autonomy, the restrictive of the government power, the participants of the public policy, the umbrella of the disadvantaged group, the advocate of the public spirit, and so on. Under the background of the modernization of the state governance, the government and the citizens have given a great expectation to the social organization, but in the process of their practice, they are faced with many difficulties, including the difficulties in the process of practice. Inadequacy of its own ability and unbalance of industry classification, especially the lack of advocacy type social organization, a large number of disadvantaged "grassroots" organizations exist in the middle of the law environment. The main reason is that the space of the social organization is the country's alienation, the natural weakness, and the Chinese model of the benefit transmission mechanism under the "party and government" system. In order to ensure that social organizations go out of the role dilemma and give full play to the function of service and advocacy, the change of the state policy and the conflict of the existing administrative regulations related to the existing social organizations must be taken to ensure that the social organizations should change their ideas and improve the transmission machines of social organizations. To optimize the legal system environment of social organization development and to strengthen the construction of social organization's own capacity. The concept of state governance modernization has laid the foundation for the development of social organization, and the development of social organization further promotes the realization of the goal of national governance modernization, and the interaction of the two is mutually beneficial.
【学位授予单位】：河南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D632.9;D630

【参考文献】