用外部评价提升耕地保护责任目标考核成效研究

发布时间：2018-07-06 10:27

本文选题：耕地保护 + 目标考核　；参考：《中国地质大学(北京)》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：本文通过对现行耕地保护目标责任考核机制的研究,对其中的三个责任主体即政府、农村集体和农户所承担的耕地保护责任属性进行了剖析,经对已实施10年的该考核制度的运行机理、成效和缺陷的分析,发现该考核制度在取得遏制耕地大量减少的势头同时,也暴露出考核耕地保护的责任不全面,反映耕地保护的成效易失真的主要问题。对此,文中用委托代理理论分析了这种导致中央政府与地方政府在目标和利益上不一致性的原因,并依据“多中心”治理等理论原则,提出了引入外部评价参与耕地保护目标责任考核的观点,并对其必要性、可行性进行了论证,对其实施路径进行了研究,提出了一系列具体措施。主要有建立独立于政府的外部评价机构;按权责一致原则开辟评价经费来源;规范外部评价的依据与原则;统一外部评价的标准与体系;探索外部评价的具体方法及如何运用外部评价结果的设想等内容。论文还用比较法,从反映提升耕地保护成效的真实性与准确程度、耕地持续保持状态和效率三个方面,对外部评价和内部评价这两种方法进行了优劣比较。得出结论:引入外部评价在检验耕地保护成效和之后工作的导向上,均优于政府“内部人”自查的内部评价。将社会力量评价引入政府的耕地保护目标责任考核中是本文的一个创新。外部评价作为一种新的政绩评价方式,其实施肯定也存在一定风险。作者预估阻力主要来自地方政府的路径依赖,由此针对性地提出应通过试点、制定政府规章、立法等方式逐步推行的风险控制思路。最后对外部评价法应用前景作出展望。
[Abstract]:Based on the study of the assessment mechanism of the objective responsibility of cultivated land protection, this paper analyzes the attributes of the responsibility for cultivated land protection undertaken by the government, the rural collectives and the peasant households, among which the three responsible subjects are the government, the rural collectives and the farmers. Based on the analysis of the operating mechanism, results and defects of the assessment system, which has been implemented for 10 years, it is found that the assessment system has achieved the momentum of curbing the large reduction of cultivated land, and at the same time, it has also exposed that the responsibility for assessing the protection of cultivated land is not comprehensive. The main problem that reflects the effect of cultivated land protection is easy to be distorted. In this paper, we use the principal-agent theory to analyze the causes of the inconsistency between the central government and the local government in terms of objectives and interests, and based on the theory of "multi-center" governance. This paper puts forward the idea of introducing external evaluation into the assessment of the objective responsibility of cultivated land protection, demonstrates its necessity and feasibility, studies its implementation path, and puts forward a series of concrete measures. It mainly includes establishing an external evaluation organization independent of the government; opening up the evaluation funds according to the principle of consistent power and responsibility; standardizing the basis and principle of external evaluation; unifying the standard and system of external evaluation; To explore the specific methods of external evaluation and how to use the assumption of external evaluation results and so on. The paper also compares the external evaluation and internal evaluation from three aspects: the authenticity and accuracy of improving the effectiveness of cultivated land protection, the status and efficiency of cultivated land sustainable maintenance, and the comparison between external evaluation and internal evaluation. It is concluded that the introduction of external evaluation is superior to the internal evaluation of the government's "insiders" in examining the effectiveness of cultivated land protection and the orientation of later work. It is an innovation of this paper to introduce social force evaluation into the assessment of the government's objective responsibility for cultivated land protection. External evaluation as a new way of performance evaluation, its implementation must also have certain risks. The author estimates that the resistance mainly comes from the path dependence of the local government, and thus puts forward the idea of risk control which should be carried out step by means of pilot, government regulations and legislation. Finally, the application prospect of external evaluation method is prospected.
【学位授予单位】：中国地质大学(北京)
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：F301.21;D630

【参考文献】