贫困治理行政主导与社会协同的合作之路
发布时间：2018-09-06 09:42
【摘要】：贫困治理成效是判断全面小康社会建成与否的核心标志。十八大以来,脱贫攻坚可谓成绩斐然。在赞许行政主导所取得现实绩效的同时,也要看到贫困治理对社会协同的历史诉求。囿于行政权力集中性与统一性的偏好,在治理实践中难免存在一些潜在风险。结合"田东模式"与"郝堂试验"的治理实践,阐述了行政主导下的市场路径与社会路径中的行动者构成与合作化过程。为避免行政主导的潜在风险、培育社会反贫困的内生动力、实现贫困治理的可持续性,需要在"上—下""内—外"的双向沟通机制、"直接—间接"互惠的激励机制及"资本—资产"的互通机制等方面,进一步提升政府主导下政府、市场与社会的合作化水平。
[Abstract]:The effect of poverty management is the core symbol of judging whether the overall well-off society is built or not. Since the 18th National Congress of the people's Republic of China (CPC), it has achieved remarkable results in overcoming poverty. At the same time, it is necessary to recognize the historical appeal of poverty governance to social coordination. Due to the preference of centralization and unity of administrative power, there are some potential risks in governance practice. Combined with the governance practice of "Tian Dong Model" and "Hao Tang experiment", this paper expounds the formation and cooperative process of the actors in the market path and the social path under the administrative guidance. In order to avoid the potential risks of executive-led, cultivate the endogenous power of anti-poverty in society, and realize the sustainability of poverty management, It is necessary to further enhance the cooperative level of government, market and society under the guidance of the government in such aspects as the two-way communication mechanism of "top-down" and "internal and external", the reciprocal incentive mechanism of "direct and indirect" and the mutual mechanism of "capital and assets".
【作者单位】： 国际关系学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金青年项目(15CZZ017) 北京市社科基金一般项目(16ZGB004)
【分类号】：D632.1
本文编号：2225953
[Abstract]:The effect of poverty management is the core symbol of judging whether the overall well-off society is built or not. Since the 18th National Congress of the people's Republic of China (CPC), it has achieved remarkable results in overcoming poverty. At the same time, it is necessary to recognize the historical appeal of poverty governance to social coordination. Due to the preference of centralization and unity of administrative power, there are some potential risks in governance practice. Combined with the governance practice of "Tian Dong Model" and "Hao Tang experiment", this paper expounds the formation and cooperative process of the actors in the market path and the social path under the administrative guidance. In order to avoid the potential risks of executive-led, cultivate the endogenous power of anti-poverty in society, and realize the sustainability of poverty management, It is necessary to further enhance the cooperative level of government, market and society under the guidance of the government in such aspects as the two-way communication mechanism of "top-down" and "internal and external", the reciprocal incentive mechanism of "direct and indirect" and the mutual mechanism of "capital and assets".
【作者单位】： 国际关系学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金青年项目(15CZZ017) 北京市社科基金一般项目(16ZGB004)
【分类号】：D632.1
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前5条
1 郑辉,苏孔孝,王学义;国家权力增长限制与地方行政主导[J];成都行政学院学报(社会科学类);2001年01期
2 汪波,曹南平;WTO视野下我国地方政府行政主导格局变迁[J];中国行政管理;2002年10期
3 毛寿龙;行政主导的“公共选择”悲剧[J];安徽决策咨询;2003年01期
4 张j9沁;郭伟和;;去行政主导的草根NGO发展策略——基于三个草根NGO的社会资本实证研究[J];东南学术;2012年02期
5 罗晓华;;行政主导式制度建构的内在机理——广州番禺新农合的制度经济学解析[J];广东技术师范学院学报;2014年08期
相关重要报纸文章 前2条
1 王攀;行政主导下的慈善更是一种无奈[N];中国经济时报;2007年
2 魏英杰;抗灾也应发挥民间积极作用[N];东方早报;2008年
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 刘宸;行政主导下的公益创投：实践观察与理论思考[D];南京师范大学;2015年
，本文编号：2225953
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/zhengwuguanli/2225953.html
