交互式电子白板课堂教学评价指标体系的构建研究

发布时间：2018-03-24 01:37

本文选题：交互式电子白板　切入点：课堂教学　出处：《浙江师范大学》2016年硕士论文

【摘要】：信息技术广泛应用于教育领域,并不能引发教育根本变革,只有将信息技术与教学融合,优化课堂教学结构,才能引发教育根本变革,这也是我国教育信息化发展的终极目标。但是,当前我国的教育信息化只进入应用整合阶段,距离全面融合的发展目标还有较大差距。交互式电子白板作为助力教育信息化创新发展的利器,在我国中小学课堂的应用已经基本普及,处于开始融合的阶段,离深入融合还有一定的差距。本研究在交互白板基础教育应用相关研究不断丰富和成熟的背景下,构建交互式电子白板课堂教学评价指标体系,从评价的角度来探究当前白板具体应该如何与课堂教学相融合。首先,本研究在对交互白板及信息化课堂教学评价相关文献筛选、梳理、分析的基础上,将交互式电子白板课堂教学评价指标体系划分为学生评价、教师评价、教学设计评价、教学过程评价、教学环境评价五个维度,进一步分析交互式电子白板与教学融合的相关文献资料,深入了解当前交互白板与教学融合的现状、融合阶段的特征。在此基础上,参考相关评价研究的具体指标说明,结合交互白板与教学融合阶段的特征,初步拟定评价指标体系并编制成第一次德尔菲法问卷,该问卷一级指标有5个、二级指标有19个、具体指标内涵有66个。为检验这些指标是否适合评价当前交互白板课堂教学,促进白板与教学的融合,笔者采用德尔菲法,进行两轮专家意见征询,通过量化分析和质化分析进行一致性检验,最终确定交互式电子白板课堂教学评价指标体系,其中包括教学设计、教学过程、教学环境3个一级指标,13个二级指标和35个具体指标内涵。接着依照层次分析法的理论概念设计权重系数调查表,发放并回收后,将专家意见录入yaahp0.6.0软件,并进行一致性检验,对一致性没有通过的数据进行一致性修复。根据收集到的数据,运用yaahp0.6.0软件计算出各专家对一级指标和各维度二级指标的权重系数,最后利用算数平均数计算出一级指标的权重以及二级指标的初始权重,用一级指标的总权重乘以各自维度二级指标的初始权重得到最终各项的权重系数。在完成以上工作后,本研究在结果与讨论部分,给出了最终构建的交互式电子白板课堂教学评价指标体系(配有权重和评价等级),并对指标权重进行排序,结合专家访谈结果进行分析,降低系统误差,验证其科学性。
[Abstract]:The extensive application of information technology in the field of education cannot lead to a fundamental change in education. Only by merging information technology with teaching and optimizing the structure of classroom teaching can the fundamental reform of education be initiated. This is also the ultimate goal of the development of educational informatization in China. However, the current educational informatization in China is only entering the stage of application integration. There is still a big gap between the development goal of comprehensive integration. As a sharp weapon to help the innovation and development of educational informatization, interactive electronic whiteboard has been widely used in the classroom of primary and secondary schools in our country, and it is in the beginning of integration stage. There is still a certain gap from the deep integration. Under the background of rich and mature research on the application of interactive whiteboard in basic education, this study constructs the evaluation index system of interactive electronic whiteboard classroom teaching. From the perspective of evaluation to explore how the current whiteboard should be integrated with classroom teaching. First of all, this study on the interactive whiteboard and information classroom teaching evaluation related literature screening, combing, analysis, based on, The evaluation index system of interactive electronic whiteboard classroom teaching is divided into five dimensions: student evaluation, teacher evaluation, teaching design evaluation, teaching process evaluation and teaching environment evaluation. Further analysis of the interactive whiteboard and teaching fusion literature, in-depth understanding of the current situation of interactive whiteboard and teaching fusion, the characteristics of the fusion stage. According to the characteristics of interactive whiteboard and teaching fusion stage, the evaluation index system was preliminarily drawn up and the first Delphi questionnaire was compiled. There were 5 first-grade indexes and 19 second-level indicators in this questionnaire. There are 66 specific indicators. In order to test whether these indicators are suitable for evaluating the current interactive whiteboard classroom teaching and promoting the integration of whiteboard and teaching, the author adopts Delphi method to conduct two rounds of expert consultation. The evaluation index system of interactive electronic whiteboard classroom teaching, including teaching design and teaching process, is determined through the consistency test of quantitative analysis and qualitative analysis. According to the theoretical concept of Analytic hierarchy process (AHP), the weight coefficient questionnaire is designed, and the expert opinion is input into yaahp0.6.0 software, and the consistency is checked. According to the collected data, using yaahp0.6.0 software to calculate the weight coefficient of each expert to the first-grade index and the second-order index of each dimension. Finally, the weight of the first class index and the initial weight of the second class index are calculated by the arithmetic average, and the weight coefficient of the final items is obtained by multiplying the total weight of the first class index by the initial weight of the second class index of their respective dimension. In the part of result and discussion, this paper presents the final construction of interactive electronic whiteboard classroom teaching evaluation index system (with weight and evaluation level, and the weight of the index is sorted, combined with the results of expert interviews to analyze. Reduce the system error, verify its scientific nature.
【学位授予单位】：浙江师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：G434

【相似文献】