高中生函数学习现状的调查研究

发布时间：2017-12-27 10:11

本文关键词：高中生函数学习现状的调查研究　出处：《东北师范大学》2015年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：新课改背景下,平时的教育教学工作中,老师要多关注学生,坚持以学生为主体。对学生学习现状的研究,非常符合新课改的要求。函数是高中数学的核心内容,学生学好了函数,不仅有助于其他知识的习得,还有助于提升他们的数学思维,为后续学习打下坚实基础。本文主要是对高中生函数学习现状进行调查研究。调查的对象是云南省玉溪第三中学的高一、高二文科、高二理科、高三文科、高三理科五类学生。以问卷的形式对这五类学生进行调查。调查问卷主要包括两部分的内容：一部分是关于学生函数相关知识学习程度的问题,另一部分是关于学生对学习函数的看法、态度,即非认知因素的问题。问卷以客观题的形式呈现,问题的选项设置是固定的。第一部分关于学生函数相关知识学习程度的问题,选项设置分为5个层次：1.非常好,2.较好,3.一般,4.不好,5.非常不好,并作出相应的解释。第二部分关于学生学习函数非认知因素的问题,选项设置也分为5个层次：1.非常符合,2.比较符合,3.一般符合,4.不太符合,5.完全不符合。学生根据自己的实际情况,选出符合自己的选项。通过运用Excel、SPSS软件对数据进行分析,得出一些结论。分别对五类学生的数据进行统计,对函数相关知识学习评价的数据中,可以发现他们在函数相关知识学习评价上的差异；对学习函数非认知因素问题评价的数据中,可以发现他们对学习函数兴趣高低,压力、困难程度的认识,解决问题的能力强弱等,这些为老师的教学提供一些现实依据。对五类学生函数相关知识学习程度的综合分析,可以发现选择“1”和“2”两项,即对函数学习评价较好的累积百分比,从高到低,依次是高三理科生、高三文科生、高二理科生、高一学生、高二文科生。选择“4”和“5”两项,即对函数学习评价不好的累积百分比,从高到低,依次是高二文科生、高一学生、高三文科生、高二理科生、高三理科生。对五类学生学习函数非认知因素评价的综合分析,从学习兴趣来看,高三理科生学习兴趣最高,高二文科生最低,其余三类学生介于之间；从学习函数压力大,函数难理解、抽象,看不懂题目几方面来看,高三文科生比较赞同,高三理科生赞同度最低,介于之间的分别是高二文科生、高一学生、高二理科生。从解决函数问题的能力来看,高三理科生最高,高二文科生最低,其余三类学生介于之间。对全体高中生函数学习提出的建议是：1.加强函数相关知识背景的学习,2.加强函数模型及其应用的学习,3.函数学习过程中应当加强知识迁移能力的培养,4.培养学生函数知识体系建构的能力,5.培养学生运用计算器、计算机等信息技术对函数进行学习的能力,6.培养学生把平时遇到的某些问题转化为函数问题来解决的能力。还分别给每一类学生提出一些具体学习函数的建议。
[Abstract]:Under the background of the new curriculum reform, the teachers should pay more attention to the students and insist on the students as the main body in the normal education and teaching work. The study of the present situation of the students is in line with the requirements of the new curriculum reform. Function is the core content of high school mathematics. Students learn function well, not only helps to acquire other knowledge, but also helps to improve their mathematical thinking and lay a solid foundation for subsequent learning. This article is mainly to investigate the status of high school students' function learning. The object of the survey is five classes of students of high school, high school of science, science of senior two, high school of Arts and science of high school in the third middle school of Yuxi, Yunnan province. The five types of students were investigated in the form of a questionnaire. The questionnaire mainly consists of two parts: one is about the learning degree of students' function related knowledge, the other is about students' attitude and attitude towards learning function, that is, the problem of non cognitive factors. The questionnaire is presented in the form of objective questions, and the selection of the questions is fixed. The first part is about the learning degree of students' function related knowledge. The setting of option is divided into 5 levels: 1., very good, 2. is better, 3. is general, 4. is not good, 5. is very bad, and make corresponding explanation. The second part is about the non cognitive factors of student learning function. The option settings are also divided into 5 levels: 1. is very consistent, 2. is more consistent, 3. is generally consistent, 4. is not very consistent, 5. is totally out of line. Students choose their own options according to their own actual situation. The data are analyzed by using Excel and SPSS software, and some conclusions are drawn. Of five students for statistical data, the function of knowledge learning evaluation data, they can be found in the relevant function difference evaluation on knowledge learning; learning evaluation function of non cognitive factors of data, they can be found on the learning function of interest level, the knowledge of stress, the degree of difficulty to solve the problem. Ability, these provide some realistic basis for the teacher's teaching. A comprehensive analysis of the five types of students learning function related knowledge level, can be found in "1" and "2" two, the cumulative percentage of good evaluation function learning, from high to low, followed by middle school science students, liberal arts students and science students, high school students, two students of liberal arts. Choose two items of "4" and "5", that is, the cumulative percentage of bad learning of function learning, from high to low, followed by sophomore liberal arts students, senior one students, junior high school liberal arts students, sophomore science students and senior three science students. Comprehensive analysis of non cognitive factors of the evaluation function of five types of students from learning, learning interest, learning interest of the highest grade middle school science students, liberal arts students minimum, between the remaining three categories of students from the function of pressure between; learning function, difficult to understand, abstract, cannot read a few questions in terms of Liberal Arts in comparison with. Middle school science students agree with the lowest, in between are senior high school students, liberal arts students and science students in senior high school. From the ability to solve the problem of function, the top three science students are the highest, the high school students are the lowest, the other three kinds of students are between. The function of learning and put forward suggestions for all high school: 1. to strengthen the function of knowledge learning, strengthen the 2. function model and its application study, 3. function learning process should strengthen the cultivation of the ability of knowledge transfer, cultivate the ability of students to construct knowledge system of 4. functions, 5. students use calculators, computers and other information technology learning the ability to cultivate students' ability to function 6., some problems usually encountered into function to solve the problem of the. It also puts forward some specific learning functions to each class of students.
【学位授予单位】：东北师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：G633.6

【参考文献】