2001与2011版义务教育音乐课程标准比较研究
发布时间：2018-07-21 10:23
【摘要】：音乐课程标准是国家教育部门根据我国的音乐教育实际编订纲领性文件,是对音乐课程教学与学习的基本要求。它是音乐教材编写的依据,对音乐教学的设计及评价有着指导性的意义。音乐课程标准中所涉及的音乐课程的性质、理念、内容的基本要求以及教学评价是基础音乐教育的灵魂。长期以来我国教育部门都在不断地、努力的制定高质量的音乐课程标准。从我国的基本教育实际出发,借鉴了苏联、美国等音乐教育发展较好的一些国家的教育制度和课程设置进行我国音乐课程标准的改革。本文重点将从比较的角度对2001年印制的《全日制义务教育音乐课程标准(实验稿)》(以下简称“实验稿”)和2011年编订的《义务教育音乐课程标准》(以下简称“新课标”)进行详细、系统的对比,从而得出结论。本文的主要内容包括:绪论、我国义务教育音乐课程标准的历史发展、我国2001与2011年两个版本的课标的比较、新课标的争鸣与反思、研究结论与综合讨论五个部分的内容。在本文最后还将作者的一些疑问与反思以及本研究存在的问题与不足之处。
[Abstract]:The standard of music curriculum is a programmatic document compiled by the national education department according to the actual situation of music education in our country, and it is the basic requirement for the teaching and learning of music curriculum. It is the basis for the compilation of music teaching materials and has a guiding significance for the design and evaluation of music teaching. The nature, idea, content and teaching evaluation of the music curriculum involved in the music curriculum standard are the soul of the basic music education. For a long time, our education departments have been working hard to establish high-quality music curriculum standards. Starting from the reality of basic education in our country, this paper draws lessons from the educational system and curriculum setup of some countries with better development of music education, such as the Soviet Union and the United States, and carries out the reform of the music curriculum standards of our country. This article will focus on the "full-time compulsory education music curriculum standards (experimental draft)" published in 2001 (hereinafter referred to as "experimental draft") and the "compulsory education music curriculum standards" (hereinafter referred to as "the new") compiled in 2011. For details, The comparison of the system, so as to draw a conclusion. The main contents of this paper are as follows: introduction, the historical development of the music curriculum standard of compulsory education in China, the comparison between the two versions of the curriculum standard in 2001 and 2011, the contending and reflection of the new curriculum standard, and the conclusion and comprehensive discussion of the five parts. At the end of this paper, some questions and reflections of the author as well as the problems and shortcomings of this study are also discussed.
【学位授予单位】：云南师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：G633.951
本文编号：2135214
[Abstract]:The standard of music curriculum is a programmatic document compiled by the national education department according to the actual situation of music education in our country, and it is the basic requirement for the teaching and learning of music curriculum. It is the basis for the compilation of music teaching materials and has a guiding significance for the design and evaluation of music teaching. The nature, idea, content and teaching evaluation of the music curriculum involved in the music curriculum standard are the soul of the basic music education. For a long time, our education departments have been working hard to establish high-quality music curriculum standards. Starting from the reality of basic education in our country, this paper draws lessons from the educational system and curriculum setup of some countries with better development of music education, such as the Soviet Union and the United States, and carries out the reform of the music curriculum standards of our country. This article will focus on the "full-time compulsory education music curriculum standards (experimental draft)" published in 2001 (hereinafter referred to as "experimental draft") and the "compulsory education music curriculum standards" (hereinafter referred to as "the new") compiled in 2011. For details, The comparison of the system, so as to draw a conclusion. The main contents of this paper are as follows: introduction, the historical development of the music curriculum standard of compulsory education in China, the comparison between the two versions of the curriculum standard in 2001 and 2011, the contending and reflection of the new curriculum standard, and the conclusion and comprehensive discussion of the five parts. At the end of this paper, some questions and reflections of the author as well as the problems and shortcomings of this study are also discussed.
【学位授予单位】：云南师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：G633.951
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前8条
1 赵慈琳;;音乐教育哲学的批判性思考——《音乐问题——新的音乐教育哲学》基本观念解读[J];人民音乐;2009年10期
2 李飞飞;尹爱青;;音乐教育哲学:转向与反思[J];人民音乐;2011年06期
3 刘沛;音乐教育哲学观点的历史演进——兼论多维度音乐课程价值及逻辑起点[J];中国音乐;2004年04期
4 管建华;;“审美为核心的音乐教育”哲学批评与音乐教育的文化哲学建构[J];中国音乐;2005年04期
5 崔学荣;;兼容的音乐教育哲学观——基础音乐教育实践的行动指南[J];中国音乐;2008年02期
6 夏岚;;实施有效教学策略 优化音乐课堂教学[J];镇江高专学报;2012年04期
7 尚建科;;在众声喧哗中重构音乐教育哲学——韦恩·鲍曼著《音乐的哲学视野》述评[J];中国音乐;2013年03期
8 鲍丽;;浅论普通高校音乐教育对提高大学生素质的作用[J];音乐天地;2010年10期
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 庄仕鹏;我国七套初中实验音乐教科书之内容分析[D];华东师范大学;2011年
2 白艳群;音乐教学中自主性评价理论与实践研究[D];首都师范大学;2006年
，本文编号：2135214
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/chuzhongjiaoyu/2135214.html
