2009-2015年高考论说类文本中的逻辑问题及对策
发布时间：2018-09-02 06:05
【摘要】：思维能力是高中语文学习的核心素养之一,也是语文学习评价的重要意项。在语文高考中,对学生逻辑思维能力的评价,相当一部分由论说类文本的阅读理解来承担。从某种意义上说,论说类文本的阅读理解题,就是考量思维能力的工具。它要求该部分试题要有足够的指向逻辑思维测试的容量,另一方面,要求论说类文本自身的逻辑应该经得起检验。但是,在近年来的语文高考试卷中,仍然能从一些论说类文本中发现逻辑问题。对命题者来说,一方面可争取减少这样的漏洞,但也可以适当利用选文本身的逻辑问题,命制一些专门指向思维能力的测试题,这样做不仅能改善高考语文选文的质量,还为试卷命制提供了一种新的思路。
[Abstract]:Thinking ability is one of the core qualities of high school Chinese learning, and also an important meaning of Chinese learning evaluation. In the college entrance examination of Chinese, the evaluation of students' logical thinking ability is carried out by reading comprehension of argumentative texts. In a sense, reading comprehension of argumentative texts is a tool for thinking. On the other hand, it requires that the logic of the argumentative text itself should stand up to the test. However, in recent years, logic problems can still be found in some argumentative texts. For propositions, on the one hand, they can strive to reduce such loopholes, but they can also make proper use of the logic problems of the selection of articles themselves, and order some test questions that are specifically directed to the ability of thinking. This can not only improve the quality of the selection of papers in the college entrance examination. It also provides a new way of thinking for the test paper system.
【作者单位】： 上海师范大学中文系;
【分类号】：G634.3
本文编号：2218488
[Abstract]:Thinking ability is one of the core qualities of high school Chinese learning, and also an important meaning of Chinese learning evaluation. In the college entrance examination of Chinese, the evaluation of students' logical thinking ability is carried out by reading comprehension of argumentative texts. In a sense, reading comprehension of argumentative texts is a tool for thinking. On the other hand, it requires that the logic of the argumentative text itself should stand up to the test. However, in recent years, logic problems can still be found in some argumentative texts. For propositions, on the one hand, they can strive to reduce such loopholes, but they can also make proper use of the logic problems of the selection of articles themselves, and order some test questions that are specifically directed to the ability of thinking. This can not only improve the quality of the selection of papers in the college entrance examination. It also provides a new way of thinking for the test paper system.
【作者单位】： 上海师范大学中文系;
【分类号】：G634.3
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 唐遇春;;练习(14)杂说类文段阅读[J];语文月刊;1996年Z1期
2 孙利萍;;论汉语言说类话语标记的基本特征[J];暨南学报(哲学社会科学版);2012年04期
3 ;[J];;年期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 商报记者 李雅宁;“图说”成社科书救市灵丹？[N];中国图书商报;2007年
相关硕士学位论文 前4条
1 麻玉林;明清白话小说言说类插入语研究[D];浙江师范大学;2011年
2 王梓秋;留学生汉语言说类动词习得研究[D];南京师范大学;2015年
3 王展;汉语交际框架下的言说类动词研究[D];北京大学;2008年
4 田源;汉语“说”类动词研究[D];华中师范大学;2007年
，本文编号：2218488
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/chuzhongjiaoyu/2218488.html
