图形与几何的教材分析
发布时间：2018-09-13 14:51
【摘要】：从2001年我国颁布《标准(实验稿)》到2011年的《标准(2011年版)》,几何部分一直都是重点,从“空间与图形”到“图形与几何”,该部分一直都是义务教育阶段四大领域之一,而人教版教材是目前国内用的最多的教材,也是教材的典型代表,如何既遵循课程标准的变化,又可以在教材中更好的呈现“图形与几何”领域,是一个需要研究的问题。本文从课标入手,纵向分析“图形与几何”在人教版教材中的呈现与编排,并且对以后的课程标准以及教材的编写提出建议,并对教师的教学产生一定的启发。本文选取《标准(实验稿)》和《标准(2011年版)》中关于“图形与几何”的目标要求和内容要求,进行横向对比分析,并在此基础中,对人教版义务教育实验教科书进行分析,对每一个学段的编排体例、编写方式进行分析,并从每一个学段选出典型例子从呈现方式、知识结构等方面进行对比,寻找人教版教材在“图形与几何”领域的优点以及不足。通过研究,我们发现：1.从编排体例来看,人教版教材基本上是按照课程标准的要求进行编排的,每一册都包含了“图形与几何”的知识,基本上也达到了课程标准的目标要求。2.从编写方式上看,人教版教材虽然知识安排不够紧密,但也符合课程标准“螺旋式上升”的要求,也体现了课程标准从人出发、以人为本的基本课程理念。3.从呈现方式上看,人教版的知识呈现比较符合学生的思维特点,这是人教版的优点,但是也有不足,知识跨度太大,这就容易割裂数学知识的整体性。通过上面的分析,我们可以看出来人教版教材在“图形与几何”领域的编写基本上是符合课程标准的基本理念的,但是也存在不足之处,针对这些不足,笔者又分别对教材、课程标准、教师提出了建议。
[Abstract]:From the promulgation of the Standard (Experimental draft) in 2001 to the Standard (2011 Edition) in 2011, the geometric part has always been the focus, from "Space and Graphics" to "Graphics and Geometry", which has always been one of the four fields of compulsory education. The teaching material of human education is the most widely used teaching material in our country at present, and it is also a typical representative of the textbook. How to follow the change of curriculum standard, and how to better present the field of "figure and geometry" in the textbook is a problem that needs to be studied. Starting with the curriculum standard, this paper analyzes the presentation and arrangement of "Graphics and Geometry" in the teaching material of human education edition, and puts forward some suggestions on the course standard and the compilation of the textbook in the future, and gives some enlightenment to the teaching of teachers. In this paper, the objective and content requirements of "Graphics and Geometry" in "Standard (Experimental draft)" and "Standard (2011 Edition)" are selected for horizontal comparative analysis. This paper analyzes the arrangement style and writing method of each learning paragraph, and selects typical examples from each learning paragraph to compare the presentation mode, knowledge structure, and so on, in order to find out the advantages and disadvantages of the teaching material in the field of "graphics and geometry". Through our research, we found that: 1. In terms of layout style, the teaching materials of human education edition are basically arranged according to the requirements of curriculum standards, and each volume contains the knowledge of "graphics and geometry", which basically meets the requirements of curriculum standards. From the point of view of compiling method, although the arrangement of knowledge is not close enough, it also accords with the requirement of "spiral rise" of curriculum standard, and also embodies the basic curriculum concept of "human being" and "people-oriented". From the point of view of presentation mode, the presentation of knowledge in education edition accords with the thinking characteristics of students, which is the advantage of education edition, but it also has shortcomings, and the knowledge span is too large, which is easy to separate the entirety of mathematical knowledge. Through the above analysis, we can see that the compilation of teaching materials in the field of "Graphics and Geometry" is basically in line with the basic concept of curriculum standards, but there are also shortcomings. Curriculum standards, teachers put forward suggestions.
【学位授予单位】：华中师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：G633.6
本文编号：2241490
[Abstract]:From the promulgation of the Standard (Experimental draft) in 2001 to the Standard (2011 Edition) in 2011, the geometric part has always been the focus, from "Space and Graphics" to "Graphics and Geometry", which has always been one of the four fields of compulsory education. The teaching material of human education is the most widely used teaching material in our country at present, and it is also a typical representative of the textbook. How to follow the change of curriculum standard, and how to better present the field of "figure and geometry" in the textbook is a problem that needs to be studied. Starting with the curriculum standard, this paper analyzes the presentation and arrangement of "Graphics and Geometry" in the teaching material of human education edition, and puts forward some suggestions on the course standard and the compilation of the textbook in the future, and gives some enlightenment to the teaching of teachers. In this paper, the objective and content requirements of "Graphics and Geometry" in "Standard (Experimental draft)" and "Standard (2011 Edition)" are selected for horizontal comparative analysis. This paper analyzes the arrangement style and writing method of each learning paragraph, and selects typical examples from each learning paragraph to compare the presentation mode, knowledge structure, and so on, in order to find out the advantages and disadvantages of the teaching material in the field of "graphics and geometry". Through our research, we found that: 1. In terms of layout style, the teaching materials of human education edition are basically arranged according to the requirements of curriculum standards, and each volume contains the knowledge of "graphics and geometry", which basically meets the requirements of curriculum standards. From the point of view of compiling method, although the arrangement of knowledge is not close enough, it also accords with the requirement of "spiral rise" of curriculum standard, and also embodies the basic curriculum concept of "human being" and "people-oriented". From the point of view of presentation mode, the presentation of knowledge in education edition accords with the thinking characteristics of students, which is the advantage of education edition, but it also has shortcomings, and the knowledge span is too large, which is easy to separate the entirety of mathematical knowledge. Through the above analysis, we can see that the compilation of teaching materials in the field of "Graphics and Geometry" is basically in line with the basic concept of curriculum standards, but there are also shortcomings. Curriculum standards, teachers put forward suggestions.
【学位授予单位】：华中师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：G633.6
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前7条
1 孟庆荣;;“空间与几何”教学的启示[J];中国科教创新导刊;2013年30期
2 鲍建生;几何的教育价值与课程目标体系[J];教育研究;2000年04期
3 刘婧;;小学数学“空间与图形”中的测量及其教学[J];科教文汇(下旬刊);2010年06期
4 朱丽丽,张景斌;中、美、俄三国几何课程的比较与分析[J];首都师范大学学报(社会科学版);2002年S1期
5 祁平;几何教育功能的哲学思考[J];数学通报;2001年05期
6 李伟军;;刍议2011版义务教育阶段数学课程标准[J];数学教育学报;2014年06期
7 刘兴祥;徐志强;赵耀峰;;中国数学课程标准发展史[J];延安大学学报(自然科学版);2006年02期
，本文编号：2241490
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/chuzhongjiaoyu/2241490.html
