远程开放学习和终身学习研究:历史趋势与发展

发布时间：2018-06-20 20:58

本文选题：远程教育 + 在线学习　；参考：《中国远程教育》2017年08期

【摘要】：在当下的远程开放学习和终身学习研究领域,出现了否认在线学习发展历史、忽略已有优质研究的倾向。甚至一些颇具影响力的教育工作者在以不同的形式发表言论,仿佛在线学习的优质实践近年才出现。换句话说,一些对在线学习研究一无所知的人正在"重建"这个领域。而一些报告和学术文章中的错误引用或以讹传讹更加剧了对过去的否认,对维果茨基文献的错误引用即是一个典型证明。关于1985年至2010年《教育技术摘要》刊发文章的关键词的汇总和分析表明了这个领域学术研究的"重建""再循环""遗忘"的一些规律。这些规律体现在远程教育的"质量保证""最佳实践""教学设计指导原则"等相关研究与实践方面。近年对慕课的研究亦完全忽略了2000年亚洲以及其他地方已经在提供大规模公开在线课程的事实。十年前我们犯过的错误,如今我们还在重复,并且似乎更严重了。如果我们不能吸取过去的经验教训,不能很好学习和借鉴以往的优秀研究成果,不能采用已经总结出来的好的基本原则,那我们无异于在沙滩上建城堡。
[Abstract]:In the field of distance open learning and lifelong learning, there is a tendency to deny the history of online learning and ignore the existing high-quality research. Even influential educators are speaking in different ways, as if good practices of online learning have only recently emerged. In other words, people who know nothing about online learning research are rebuilding the field. The false citations in some reports and academic articles have aggravated the denial of the past, and the false citation of the Vygotsky literature is a typical proof. The summary and analysis of the key words of the articles published from 1985 to 2010 show some laws of "reconstruction", "recycling" and "forgetting" of academic research in this field. These laws are embodied in the relevant research and practice of distance education, such as "quality assurance", "best practice", "instructional design guiding principle" and so on. Recent studies of Moo have also completely ignored the fact that Asia and elsewhere already offer large-scale open online courses in 2000. The mistakes we made ten years ago are still repeated and seem to be getting worse. If we can't learn from the lessons of the past, learn from the excellent research of the past, or adopt the good basic principles that have been summed up, then we are building castles on the beach.
【作者单位】：英国心理学会;
【分类号】：G434;G720

【相似文献】