校外教育质量评估指标研究
本文选题:校外教育 + 质量内涵 ; 参考:《华东师范大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:当前,校外教育质量评估问题越来越受到重视,但校外教育质量评估指标的确定和运用普遍比较随意,专业性严重不足,很难适应和引导校外教育的质量提升。为此,需要大力加强校外教育评估指标的基础研究。依托于哲学、社会学、教育学的理论视角分析发现,校外教育评估指标研制必须遵循我国教育的根本目标、体现校外教育的独特性等要求。从现实基础来看,政策驱动、国际借鉴、现实需要,是构建校外教育质量评估指标构建的重要参考。校外教育质量评估指标的研制必须遵循科学性、发展性、时代性的基本原则。确保指标构建的信度和效度,是校外教育质量评估指标研制必须注意的科学规范。校外教育质量评估指标的构建,在很大程度上取决于校外教育质量的基本框架。作为指导与评估校外教育的导向性工具,校外教育质量框架是对高质量的学习内容、教学和学习、领导和管理、支持与保障的具体描绘,旨在将抽象的教育质量概念转化为实践性的、具体的、描述性的内容。依据"S.M.A.R.T"的原则,运用头脑风暴法、专家征询法与调查统计法,按照"维度-领域-指标-实践描述"的层次,可以构筑起以"学习内容、教学与学习、领导与管理、支持与保障"四大维度为核心的校外教育质量评估指标体系。在此基础上,校外教育质量评估指标可以应用于校外教育机构的整体评估与重点领域的评估,但必须遵循从单向的问责转向促进质量改进、强调评估信息与结果解释的透明与清晰等原则。作为评估的重要反馈,校外教育质量评估报告的发布,要注意以服务对象为中心、共同研发并充分征询、兼顾丰富性与实用性。总之,校外教育质量评估指标的建构要注意以下几点:问题导向、博采众长,建构多层次、多维度的指标框架;关注需求,增进理解,制定合理的、可信的评估指标;依托技术支撑,强化校外教育数据搜集与信息化平台建设。
[Abstract]:At present, more and more attention has been paid to the quality evaluation of off-campus education. However, the determination and application of the evaluation index of the quality of off-campus education is generally random, and the specialty is seriously inadequate, so it is difficult to adapt and guide the quality improvement of the out-of-school education. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen the basic research on the evaluation index of outside-school education. Based on the theoretical analysis of philosophy, sociology and pedagogy, it is found that the development of the evaluation index of out-of-school education must follow the basic goal of education in our country and embody the uniqueness of out-of-school education. From the point of view of reality, policy drive, international reference and realistic need are the important reference for the construction of quality evaluation index of out-of-school education. The development of the evaluation index of the quality of education out of school must follow the basic principles of science, development and times. To ensure the reliability and validity of the index construction is the scientific standard which must be paid attention to in the development of the evaluation index of the quality of out-of-school education. To a great extent, the construction of the evaluation index of the quality of off-campus education depends on the basic framework of the quality of out-of-school education. As a guiding tool for guiding and evaluating out-of-school education, the quality framework of out-of-school education is a concrete description of high-quality learning content, teaching and learning, leadership and management, support and guarantee. The aim is to transform the abstract concept of educational quality into practical, concrete and descriptive content. According to the principle of "S.M.A.R.T", using brainstorming method, expert consultation method and investigation statistics, according to the level of "dimensional-domain-indicators-practice description", it can be constructed as "learning content, teaching and learning, leadership and management." Support and guarantee "four dimensions as the core of the evaluation index system of the quality of outside school education." On this basis, the quality assessment indicators of out-of-school education can be applied to the overall assessment and the evaluation of the focus areas of the out-of-school education institutions, but must follow the direction of one-way accountability to promote quality improvement. Emphasize the principles of transparency and clarity of evaluation information and interpretation of results. As an important feedback of evaluation, the issue of quality assessment report of out-of-school education should pay attention to the service object as the center, research and development together and full consultation, taking into account the richness and practicability. In short, we should pay attention to the following points in the construction of the evaluation index of the quality of out-of-school education: problem orientation, extensive learning, constructing a multi-level and multi-dimensional index framework, paying attention to needs, enhancing understanding, making reasonable and credible evaluation index; Relying on technical support, strengthening the data collection and information platform construction.
【学位授予单位】:华东师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:G77
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 核心素养研究课题组;;中国学生发展核心素养[J];中国教育学刊;2016年10期
2 曾家延;赵晶;;美国四种校长教学领导力评估模型的比较与评论[J];外国中小学教育;2016年10期
3 刘登珲;;我国校外教育功能定位流变及其现代转向[J];湖南师范大学教育科学学报;2016年05期
4 张昱瑾;;少年宫教育课程结构建设:内涵、问题与构想[J];全球教育展望;2016年07期
5 尹睿;;“互联网+”时代学习环境重构:技术后现象学的视角[J];现代远程教育研究;2016年03期
6 潘本锋;李莉娜;;环境空气质量指数计算方法与分级方案比较[J];中国环境监测;2016年01期
7 王秀江;;我国校外教育政策的价值分析[J];教育科学研究;2016年02期
8 徐莉;;中小学校外培训乱象及其体制根源探寻[J];教育科学;2015年04期
9 曾天山;吴景松;崔洁芳;王重;;国际教育指标的选择、应用与借鉴[J];教育发展研究;2015年01期
10 安桂清;童璐;;学生学校幸福感测评框架研究述评[J];外国教育研究;2014年12期
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 安晓敏;教育公平指标体系研究[D];东北师范大学;2008年
2 易春秋;建国十七年中学思想政治教育研究[D];中共中央党校;2005年
相关硕士学位论文 前7条
1 杨睿智;基础教育质量评价指标的研制[D];东北师范大学;2014年
2 郭群;教育政策绩效评价指标体系建构研究[D];浙江师范大学;2012年
3 蔡昕;论校外教育的结构—功能定位[D];华东师范大学;2012年
4 蒋冠宇;义务教育均衡发展指标体系研究[D];杭州师范大学;2012年
5 董秀兰;美国21世纪社区学习中心计划研究[D];华中师范大学;2009年
6 孙桂丽;区域教育现代化指标体系研究[D];苏州大学;2009年
7 王正惠;农村高中教育发展指标体系研究[D];东北师范大学;2006年
,本文编号:2107389
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/crjy/2107389.html