书院建设在中国:制度与张力

发布时间：2018-04-28 10:06

本文选题：高校 + 书院　；参考：《教育学术月刊》2017年04期

【摘要】：高校书院的制度要素可以从书院数量、覆盖年级、覆盖学生、集体住宿、学院书院关系、是否精英化、学工系统设计、是否提供正式课程、有无提供组织化的教育设计、是否具有公共空间/仪式等十个方面展开分析。对国内985工程高校书院的制度分析表明:书院这一术语的内涵十分丰富,不同高校虽然都在使用"书院"这一标识,但背后往往意味着迥异的制度要素组合、历史渊源和改革期许。同时,这一概念至今仍处于不断生成和发展中。高校实行书院制的改革路径不尽一致,这不仅有基于改革成本的考量,更暗含着改革理念在"通识教育/专业教育""精英教育/大众教育"之间的不同价值选择。由于专业院系和书院之间的功能缺乏有效区分,因而或是存在二者之间课程安排、活动组织、学生认同感等方面的冲突,或是具有强化书院封闭性的风险。自上而下的组织再造和自下而上的组织生成是书院建设中不可忽视而又需要谨慎平衡的组织化力量。
[Abstract]:The institutional elements of a college can range from the number of colleges, covering grades, covering students, collective accommodation, college relations, whether elite, academic system design, whether to provide formal courses, whether to provide an organized education design, Whether there is a public space / ceremony and other ten aspects of the analysis. The institutional analysis of the academies of 985 engineering colleges in China shows that the term "academy" is very rich in connotation. Although different colleges and universities use the logo of "academy", it often means the combination of different institutional elements behind it. Historical origin and reform expectations. At the same time, the concept is still growing and developing. The reform path of college system in colleges and universities is different, which is not only based on the consideration of reform cost, but also implies the different value choices between "general education / professional education" and "elite education / mass education". Due to the lack of effective distinction between professional departments and academies, there are some conflicts between them, such as curriculum arrangement, activity organization, students' identity, etc., or the risk of strengthening the closeness of academies. The top-down organizational reengineering and the bottom-up organizational formation are the organizational forces which can not be ignored but need to be carefully balanced in the college construction.
【作者单位】：复旦大学高等教育研究所;
【基金】：复旦大学新进青年教师科研起步项目“国内高校通识教育实现机制及其反思” 上海浦江人才项目“通识教育话语体系的中国化构建”
【分类号】：G649.299

【参考文献】