“围城”中的大学生:师生关系对学生自我认同变化影响的质性研究
[Abstract]:From the perspective of moral dimension, this study chooses 6 college students who have received a master's education to consider the influence of teacher-student relationship on students' self-identity. The choice of qualitative research paradigm, on the one hand, by directly listening to the voice of the research object, breaking through the existing research through speculative construction of the ideal teacher-student relationship dilemma; on the other hand, through the RUC method of life history to collect materials, In order to understand the impact of teacher-student relationship on the change of students' self-identity in a comprehensive picture. The main materials collected are the teacher-student relationship in primary, junior high, high school, university and master's degree. First of all, the data processing method insists on the "three-layer interaction principle", that is, the original materials collected, and the interaction between the relevant theories and the personal understanding of the researchers. Secondly, the research object combination is adopted, one of the research objects as the central figure, the other research subjects in different themes to assist the argument. This study is divided into three parts: the first part is an introduction. The second part is the first four chapters of the text. In the first chapter, they experience the risk of "student" identity loss in a more authoritative teacher-student relationship, indicating that students' self-identity has become a problem. In the second chapter, they experience the status of "seed player" or "excellent student" in a more democratic teacher-student relationship. In the third chapter, double contrast is used to show the transformation of the object's identity from "holding the halo" to "losing the aura". In the fourth chapter, through the related experiences of the subjects, they make the status choices of "my morality makes me unacceptable", "I am not a robot" and "I can only keep nodding". The third part is the fifth chapter of this paper. This part presents three contents, first, through a situational case of the central figure, which shows that the exploration of self-identity is a continuous process; secondly, summarizes the specific factors that affect the relationship between teachers and students and self-identification. And how the teacher-student relationship interacts with the individual self-identity; the third is to review and reflect on the whole research process. First of all, the connotation of "self-identity" of the subjects in this study is always the exploration of their self-identity, with social, reflective, sense of direction and sense of meaning. This foreign term, although there is a certain strangeness, but the real impact on their learning career. Secondly, the relationship between teachers and students is a very important social relationship. From the teacher's point of view, whether the student respects the authority of the teacher, the student's academic achievement or academic performance, the family background, whether the student gives gifts to the teacher, whether or not he is in the class and the student's sex all affect the teacher-student relationship. From the student's point of view, the teacher's teaching level or academic achievements, the teacher's "face", the teacher's personality charm and the teacher's positive or negative words all affect the teacher-student relationship. Third, the relationship between teachers and students affects students' self-identity. When the teacher-student relationship is alienated by specific influencing factors, it will hinder students' self-identification, while a kind of democratic or positive teacher-student relationship will promote students' self-identity when it leads students to grow up.
【学位授予单位】:南京师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:G645.6
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 吴飞燕;;小学生班级小团体现象及其引导策略[J];当代教育理论与实践;2014年07期
2 黄小莲;刘力;;价值博弈中的我国班级教育研究:历程、内容与路径[J];华东师范大学学报(教育科学版);2013年04期
3 曹桂生;曹阳;;“内模仿”与“无意识”理论[J];西安交通大学学报(社会科学版);2013年05期
4 曹砚辉;;当前高校师生关系存在的问题及解决对策[J];教育探索;2012年03期
5 潘林珍;;高校师德建设的路径选择:制度伦理及制度构建[J];江苏高教;2011年05期
6 马川;;对话自我理论——具有动态功能性的自我理论[J];湖北社会科学;2010年10期
7 周杰;周洋;;论学生自我认同危机与教育的应然姿态[J];教育学术月刊;2010年08期
8 潘绥铭;姚星亮;黄盈盈;;论定性调查的人数问题:是“代表性”还是“代表什么”的问题——“最大差异的信息饱和法”及其方法论意义[J];社会科学研究;2010年04期
9 潘泽泉;;自我认同与底层社会建构:迈向经验解释的中国农民工[J];社会科学;2010年05期
10 严志兰;;质性研究方法与宏大历史视野[J];中共福建省委党校学报;2009年11期
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 郭成;青少年学业自我研究[D];西南大学;2006年
2 周宗伟;“高尚”与“卑贱”的距离[D];南京师范大学;2003年
相关硕士学位论文 前5条
1 甘欢;道德发生的社会机制[D];长安大学;2015年
2 文斌;大学生道德判断能力、道德自我认同与学业欺骗行为的关系[D];四川师范大学;2012年
3 熊娜;JDCS模型视角下工科硕士层级师生关系异化研究[D];华中师范大学;2011年
4 苏永建;基于扎根理论的大学生学校认同过程研究[D];华中科技大学;2009年
5 吴煜辉;大学生自我分化与压力知觉、心理健康的关系[D];河北师范大学;2008年
,本文编号:2283551
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/gaodengjiaoyulunwen/2283551.html