高校科研评价规则变革问题研究

发布时间：2019-04-01 14:27

【摘要】：科研评价作为科研管理手段之一,在推动高校创新转型中具有重要导向功能。但对当前我国高校科研评价规则的考察分析表明,其存在重数量增长、量化分析和评价的行政主导、模式统一、结果的功利化使用等弊端,阻碍了高校科研的健康发展,故应予变革。本文选取国外一些典型高校科研评价规则,进行对比分析,发现其普遍以质量为评价导向、实行分类和基于文献计量指标的同行评价、合理使用评价结果的做法,值得借鉴。基于此,本文论证并提出了我国高校科研评价规则完善的取向与路径,即重质量提升、定性判断以促进原创性和高质量成果产出、构建不同学科与工作领域的分类评价体系、积极实施开放和长效的学术评价机制、重评价过程的内在改善以发挥科研评价对教师学术成长和专业发展的引领作用,进而推动高校科研优质、高效、可持续发展。
[Abstract]:As one of the means of scientific research management, scientific research evaluation plays an important role in promoting the innovation and transformation of colleges and universities. However, the investigation and analysis of the current evaluation rules of scientific research in colleges and universities in our country show that it has the disadvantages such as the increase of quantity, the administrative leading role of quantitative analysis and evaluation, the unity of model, the utilitarian use of the results, and so on, which hinders the healthy development of scientific research in colleges and universities. Therefore, it should be changed. This paper selects some foreign typical universities' scientific research evaluation rules, carries on the comparative analysis, finds that it generally takes the quality as the evaluation direction, carries out the classification and the peer evaluation based on the literature measurement index, and makes rational use of the evaluation results, which is worth drawing lessons from. Based on this, this paper demonstrates and puts forward the orientation and path of perfecting the rules of scientific research evaluation in colleges and universities in our country, that is, emphasizing the improvement of quality, qualitative judgment to promote the output of original and high-quality achievements, and constructing the classification and evaluation system of different disciplines and fields of work. Active implementation of the open and long-term academic evaluation mechanism, emphasis on the internal improvement of the evaluation process in order to play a leading role in the academic growth and professional development of teachers, so as to promote the high-quality, high-efficiency and sustainable development of scientific research in colleges and universities.
【作者单位】：东北大学文法学院;中共沈阳市委党校;
【分类号】：G644

【相似文献】