教学型教授评聘调查研究
[Abstract]:The current professor evaluation system in China is a typical scientific research professor evaluation system and a scientific research oriented professional title evaluation system. There are many disadvantages in this system: it conflicts with the role orientation of university teachers themselves, which affects the full play of university teaching functions, and the teachers have great pressure, which affects the physical and mental health of teachers. It leads teachers to study for research, research for professional titles, leading to scientific research crowding out teachers' preparation or class time, affecting teaching order and teaching quality, unreasonable and unfair, affecting the enthusiasm of teachers who devote themselves to teaching work. Setting up a teaching professor is a reasonable choice to solve the malpractice of the current professor evaluation and employment system. The evaluation of professional titles should be divided into three types: "teaching-oriented", "scientific research-oriented" and "equal emphasis on teaching and scientific research". Some universities list "teaching professors" in their professional title reviews. The work of university teachers in order of importance is first teaching, followed by teaching and research, scientific research and social service. The conditions and standards for evaluating and employing teaching professors should highlight teaching performance. The investigation shows that among the conditions of evaluating and recruiting teaching professors, classroom teaching is well received by experts and students in the first place, followed by outstanding teaching and research results, teaching is exploratory, and outstanding achievements in the construction of teaching "quality engineering" projects. Get provincial / municipal teaching awards, the importance of scientific research results after the teaching results. Teaching professors should have excellent classroom teaching art, must publish more than five teaching and research papers, should have at least one provincial teaching and research project, and must be edited with more than one teaching material. Must receive at least 1 provincial teaching reward. According to these survey results, the professional title evaluation committees at all levels or the professional title evaluation committees of various universities can formulate specific conditions and standards for the evaluation and employment of teaching professors according to the requirements of some universities that have set up teaching professors.
【作者单位】: 广东韶关学院教育学院;
【基金】:2014年度教育部人文社科项目“大学教学型教授评聘研究(14YJA880096)”研究成果
【分类号】:G647
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 吴平;陈学敏;;论“教学型”教授——兼谈大学教学与科研关系[J];中国大学教学;2006年06期
2 丁海明;;中国大学更需要教学型大师[J];教育;2014年02期
3 邹晓平;;“研究型”与“教学型”院校的主要分类特征[J];高等教育研究;2007年05期
4 ;设“教学型教授”有误导倾向[J];高校教育管理;2009年05期
5 穆子赫;盛晓林;;“教学型教授”:课上得好也能评教授[J];教育与职业;2009年16期
6 李岩舟;周清;班彩霞;陈科余;詹荣;邹明;韦敏立;;教学型温室大棚的研制[J];装备制造技术;2012年06期
7 王秋峰;;大学也需要教学型大师[J];文教资料;2007年29期
8 吴杨;;高等院校教学型人才开发探索[J];文教资料;2008年04期
9 刘仁义;;新建本科院校办学定位中的“教学型、应用型、地方型”解析[J];陇东学院学报;2010年01期
10 张思光;田醒东;;地方教学型普通本科院校的社会适应性分析[J];教育与职业;2011年14期
相关会议论文 前2条
1 刘贺平;罗阿妮;孔凡凯;杨恩霞;;以课题研究为内容的教学模式探析[A];“高教强省”探索与实践——高教科研2008[C];2009年
2 郝红军;马兰;;高校组织的质量分析[A];高教改革研究与实践(下册)——黑龙江省高等教育学会2003年学术年会论文集[C];2003年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 岳德亮;设教学型教授,让专心的“教书匠”感受公平[N];新华每日电讯;2007年
2 熊丙奇;淘汰“教学型”教师动摇高校之本[N];新华每日电讯;2014年
3 钱建强;“教学型教授”给职称评定带来什么[N];光明日报;2009年
4 记者 徐光明 通讯员 盛晓明;江西理工大学特设“教学型教授”鼓励教师潜心教学[N];中国教育报;2009年
5 李雪林;吴为民;同济将聘任“教学型教授”[N];文汇报;2005年
6 记者 田豆豆;武大设立“教学型教授”岗位[N];人民日报;2005年
7 王洪发 黄红芳 嵇元;苏大建设研究教学型学府[N];新华日报;2003年
8 邬大光,,厦门大学副校长;大学分类的背后[N];中国教育报;2010年
9 刘尧;高校须多方营造“教学本位”氛围[N];中国教育报;2014年
10 本报记者 刘宁;高校计算机院系:向研究型进发[N];中国教育报;2002年
本文编号:2478984
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/gaodengjiaoyulunwen/2478984.html