高二学生心理控制源与应付方式的相关研究

发布时间：2018-04-04 22:40

本文选题：高二学生　切入点：心理控制源　出处：《四川师范大学》2008年硕士论文

【摘要】： 随着对心理健康的重视,国内外关于心理健康影响因素的研究也越来越多,其中也不乏对于心理控制源和应付方式的研究,但是研究二者之间关系的却很少见。开展对高二学生心理控制源和应付方式的研究具有重要的理论意义和现实意义,不仅可以了解他们控制源和应付方式的特点和差异,还可以获得对他们进行有针对性的心理健康教育等方面的一些启发,以便能改善高二学生的生活质量,提高他们的身心健康水平。本文以四川省成都地区、资阳地区4所中学共540名高二学生为研究对象,以内控性、有势力的他人及机遇量表(IPC)和应付方式问卷为调查工具,探讨了不同性别、不同学科、不同类型学校(重点学校和非重点学校)、来自城市和农村的高二学生其心理控制源和应付方式的特点,及二者的关系,得出如下结论: 1.大多数高二学生的心理控制源是内控型。高二学生心理控制源在内控性因子和有势力他人因子上存在显著的性别差异。男生的心理控制源比女生显著倾向于在有势力他人和内控性。高二学生在内控性因子和机遇因子上存在显著的学科差异。理科学生的心理控制源比理科学生显著倾向于内控性和机遇。高二学生在内控性因子上存在显著的城乡差异和学校差异。农村学生与城市学生相比,其心理控制源更倾向于内控性。重点学校学生与非重点学校学生相比,其心理控制源更倾向于内控性。 2.高二学生主要采取解决问题、幻想、求助、退避的应付方式。高二学生的应付方式在求助因子和合理化因子上存在显著的性别差异。女生比男生更多地使用求助方式,男生比女生更多地使用合理化方式。高二学生在求助因子和合理化因子上存在显著的学科差异。文科生比理科生更多地使用求助方式,理科生比文科生更多地使用合理化方式。高二学生在求助因子上存在显著的城乡差异和学校差异。城市学生比农村学生更多地使用求助方式。非重点学校学生比重点学校学生更多地使用求助方式。 3.心理控制源各因子与应付方式各因子存在显著相关。内控与解决问题呈显著正相关,与自责、合理化、幻想、退避呈显著负相关。外控(有势力他人和机遇)与自责、幻想、退避、合理化呈显著正相关,与解决问题、求助呈显著负相关(有势力他人因子与求助因子负相关不显著)。以心理控制源的3个因子,即内控性、有势力他人、机遇作为自变量,应付方式6各因子为因变量,进行逐步多元回归分析,发现心理控制源,尤其是机遇因子,对应付方式有显著预测作用。越是内部控制的人越多地使用积极的应付方式,越是外控的人越多地使用消极的应付方式。本研究有利于我们更透彻、更深刻地了解高二学生心理控制源和应付方式的特点,有利于我们深入了解高二学生心理控制源与应付方式之间的关系,从而可以在教育过程中结合高二学生的特点,指导他们正确地归因,有效地应对,促进其心理健康发展。
[Abstract]:With the emphasis on mental health, the domestic and foreign studies on Affecting Factors of mental health are more and more, there is no lack of studies on locus of control and coping styles, but the research on the relationship between the two is very rare. Development has important theoretical significance and practical significance to the high school students locus of control and coping style that can not only understand their characteristics and differences of locus of control and coping styles, but also can get to them for some enlightening mental health education, so as to improve the students' quality of life, improve their level of physical and mental health.
This paper takes Chengdu District of Sichuan Province, Ziyang area 4 middle schools 540 students as the research object, internal control, powerful others and chance scale (IPC) and coping style questionnaire, discusses the different gender, different disciplines, different types of schools (key schools and non key schools) the characteristics of city and countryside, from the high school students locus of control and coping styles, and the relationship between the two, draw the following conclusions:
1. the psychological control of most senior students is internal control.
There are significant gender differences in locus of control between internal control factors and influential factors in senior middle school students.
There are significant differences in the internal control factors and opportunity factors among senior two students. The locus of control of science students is significantly more inclined to internal control and opportunities than science students.
There are significant differences between urban and rural areas and school differences in the internal control factors of senior two students. Compared with urban students, locus of control is more inclined to internal control than rural students. The locus of control of key school students is more inclined to internal control than non key school students.
2. senior two students mainly adopt the coping style of solving problems, fantasies, recourse and retreat.
There are significant gender differences in coping style and help factors between senior middle school students and girls. Girls use more help than boys, and boys use rationalization more than girls do.
There are significant differences between senior middle school students in helping factors and rationalization factors. Liberal arts students use more help than science students, and science students use more rationalization than liberal arts students.
There are significant differences between urban and rural areas and school differences in the help seeking factors of senior two students. Urban students use more help seeking ways than rural students. Non key school students use more help seeking ways than key school students.
There is a significant correlation of each factor 3. psychological control factors and coping style. The internal control was positively related with problem solving and self blame, fantasy, rationalization and avoidance was negatively related to external control. (powerful others and chance) and self blame, fantasy, avoidance, rationalization was positively related with problem solving (for help, negatively influence others factor and help factor no negative significant correlation).
The 3 factors of locus of control, namely the internality, powerful others, chance as independent variables and coping style of 6 factors as the dependent variable, stepwise multiple regression analysis, found that the locus of control, especially the opportunity factor, have significant effect on coping style. The more and more people use the internal control positive coping style, more and more people outside the control of the use of negative coping styles.
This study will help us more thoroughly, more deeply understand the characteristics of senior high school students locus of control and coping styles, is conducive to our understanding of the relationship among senior students' locus of control and coping styles, which can be in the process of education combined with the characteristics of high school students, guide them to attribute correctly and effectively deal with, to promote the development of the psychological health.

【学位授予单位】：四川师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2008
【分类号】：B844.2

【引证文献】