大学生安全感与生活满意度调查研究

发布时间：2018-11-18 17:54

【摘要】：[目的]调查和分析大学生安全感与生活满意度,并考察大学生安全感与生活满意度的关系。[方法]运用丛中、安丽娟编制的安全感量表和Ed Diener编制的生活满意度量表对263名大学生进行随机调查。对结果进行独立样本t检验和相关分析。[结果]样本的安全感平均得分为57.62±9.72,生活满意度平均得分为20.43±5.53。男生与女生的安全感经t检验差异均无统计学意义(P0.05),生活满意度得分差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。不同年龄组、本科生与研究生、文科生与理工科学生以及是否学生干部的分组检验结果显示,在安全感及生活满意度得分上亦均无统计学意义(P0.05)。在是否独生子女的分组中安全感差异均无统计学意义(P0.05),而生活满意度得分差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。皮尔逊相关分析与斯皮尔曼相关分析的系数分别为0.27和0.30。[结论]样本的安全感处于中等偏上水平,生活满意度处于中等水平。女性对生活的满意度明显高于男性;独生子女的生活满意度明显高于非独生子女。大学生安全感和生活满意度之间存在中等效应的正相关关系。
[Abstract]:Objective: to investigate and analyze the relationship between sense of security and life satisfaction. Methods: the sense of security scale developed by Anlijuan and the life satisfaction scale by Ed Diener were used to investigate 263 college students randomly. The results were analyzed by t-test and correlation analysis. [results] the average score of sense of security and life satisfaction were 57.62 卤9.72 and 20.43 卤5.53 respectively. There was no significant difference in sense of security between boys and girls by t test (P0.05), but the scores of life satisfaction were significantly different (P0.05). Different age groups, undergraduate and graduate students, arts students and science students and whether the student cadres of the group test results showed that the sense of security and life satisfaction scores were not statistically significant (P0.05). There was no significant difference in sense of security between the two groups (P0.05), but there was significant difference in life satisfaction score (P0.05). The coefficients of Pearson correlation analysis and Spelman correlation analysis were 0.27 and 0.30 respectively. [conclusion] sense of security and life satisfaction of the sample were at the middle level. The life satisfaction of female is higher than that of male, and that of only child is higher than that of non-only child. There was a positive correlation between sense of security and life satisfaction.
【作者单位】：首都经济贸易大学;
【分类号】：B844.2;D668

【参考文献】