大学生领悟社会支持与人际信任的关系—应对方式的中介作用

发布时间：2018-01-15 12:36

本文关键词：大学生领悟社会支持与人际信任的关系—应对方式的中介作用　出处：《鲁东大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：大学生的身心正在走向成熟但又未完全成熟，却面临各方面的压力，例如人际关系压力、学业压力及就业压力等。应对方式是人们在面对压力情境时所使用的认知调节、情绪改变及行为策略[1]。面临各种需要解决的问题时，会形成一种相对稳定的应对方式，积极的应对方式对于缓解精神紧张和维护身心健康至关重要。人际信任表现为对别人的言语和行为的信任，特别是指在个人内部的信念或性格特质[2]。良好的人际交流与互动，会对大学生的学术发展和身心健康都会起到积极的推动作用[3]。与客观社会支持相比，领悟社会支持是指人们主观上所理解到和感觉到的支持程度，它能够更好维护个体心理健康[4]。领悟社会支持对人际信任的影响有多大，这种影响是通过什么形成的；采用什么样的应对方式，应对方式对人际信任的影响如何，这些都值得我们去探讨。但目前有关三者之间关系的研究较为稀少。本研究主要探讨大学生领悟社会支持对人际信任的影响，以及应对方式的中介作用。本研究采用整群抽样的方法，使用问卷调查法，选取鲁东大学大一到大四的320名在校生作为调查对象，施测采用解亚宁编制的简易应对方式问卷、领悟社会支持量表以及罗特编制的人际信任量表，所得研究结果以描述性统计、独立样本t检验、积差相关、多元回归分析、中介效应等统计方法来进行资料处理。本研究的结论如下： 1、大学生领悟社会支持总得分较高。朋友支持水平最高，家庭支持次之，其他人支持最低。在性别和是否独生子女上领悟社会支持有显著差异，，其中男生的领悟社会支持水平显著低于女生[5]，非独生子女的领悟社会支持水平显著高于独生子女，但是领悟社会支持不存在年级、专业类型和生源地的差异。 2、大学生人际信任的总得分比较高[6]。人际信任在性别和年级上有显著性差异，其中男生的人际信任水平显著高于女生，大一与大四的人际信任有显著差异，但是人际信任在专业类型、生源地和是否独生的差异不显著。 3、大学生应对方式更多的采用了积极应对。应对方式在性别和专业类型上有显著差异，男生的应对水平显著较低于女生[7-8]，文史类应对方式显著高于理工类，但是应对方式不存在生源地的差异。 4、领悟社会支持各项目、应对方式各项目与人际信任均存在显著相关。表现为领悟社会支持与人际信任有显著负相关，领悟社会支持与应对方式有显著正相关，应对方式与人际信任有显著负相关。 5、大学生的领悟社会支持、应对方式与人际信任具有显著预测作用。表现为朋友支持对人际信任有显著负向预测影响；朋友支持对应对方式有显著正向预测影响；其他人支持和朋友支持对积极应对有显著正向预测影响，积极应对对人际信任有着显著的负向预测影响。 6、应对方式在领悟社会支持与人际信任之间起着部分中介作用。
[Abstract]:The student is mature but not completely mature, but the face of all the pressure, such as interpersonal relationship pressure, academic pressure and employment pressure. Coping style is the people in the face of stress cognitive regulation, mood changes and behavioral strategies [1]. faces a variety of problems to solve, will form a a relatively stable coping style, positive coping style to reduce mental stress and is essential for maintaining physical and mental health.
Interpersonal trust is expressed as trust in others' speech and behavior, especially in personal beliefs or personality traits. [2]. good interpersonal communication and interaction will play a positive role in promoting academic development and physical and mental health of college students. [3].
Compared with objective social support, perceived social support refers to the degree of support that people understand and feel subjectively. It can better maintain individual mental health, [4]..
Perceived social support much impact on interpersonal trust, this effect is achieved by what form; what kind of coping style, how to influence the coping style of interpersonal trust, these are worth us to explore. But the current research on the relationship between the three is rare. This study focused on College Students' perceived social support influence of interpersonal trust, and coping style of the intermediary role.
This study used cluster sampling method, questionnaire survey method, select the Ludong University freshman to senior 320 students as the research object, measured by Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire made by Xie Ya Ning, perceived social support scale and interpersonal trust amount Roth table compiled, the research results by descriptive statistics, independent sample t test, Pearson correlation, regression analysis, statistical methods for data processing such as the mediating effect. The conclusion of this study are as follows:
1, college students' perceived social support score higher. The highest level of support from friends, family support of other people to support the lowest. In gender and whether only child perceived social support had significant difference among boys perceived social support level of [5] was significantly lower than that of girls, perceived social support level not only children were significantly higher than the one-child. But the perceived social support does not exist differences in grade, professional type and origin.
2, there are significant differences in gender and grade on the total score of interpersonal trust of college students is relatively high [6]. among interpersonal trust, interpersonal trust level of boys was significantly higher than girls, a senior and interpersonal trust have significant differences, but the interpersonal trust in the professional type, origin and whether only the difference is not significant.
3, coping styles of college students adopt more positive coping styles. Coping styles are significantly different in gender and professional type. The coping level of boys is significantly lower than that of girls. [7-8], coping styles of literature and history are significantly higher than those of science and engineering, but there is no difference in coping styles.
4, there was a significant correlation between perceived social support items, coping styles and interpersonal trust. It showed a significant negative correlation between perceived social support and interpersonal trust. Perceived social support was positively correlated with coping styles. Coping styles and interpersonal trust were negatively correlated.
5, college students' perceived social support, coping style and interpersonal trust has significant predictive effects. Friend support had significant negative predictive effect on interpersonal trust; friends support have positive influence on coping styles; others support and support for a positive response had significant positive predictive effect, positive coping significantly the negative predictive effect on interpersonal trust.
6, coping styles play a part of mediating role between understanding social support and interpersonal trust.

【学位授予单位】：鲁东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：B844.2

【参考文献】