幼儿父亲教养行为、父子依恋的结构及其关系
发布时间:2018-04-02 13:15
本文选题:幼儿 切入点:父亲教养行为 出处:《鲁东大学》2014年硕士论文
【摘要】:本文首先对目前国内外有关父亲教养行为和父子依恋的研究进行了归纳和总结,梳理了父亲教养行为和父子依恋的结构、测量方法、研究历史与研究现状。在总结前人研究经验、访谈多位幼儿父亲、频繁入户观察两个幼儿家庭的基础上,自行编制了《幼儿父亲教养行为问卷》,向200名幼儿父亲发放了《幼儿父亲教养行为问卷》进行试测,对收回的156份有效问卷进行了探索性因素分析,向120名幼儿父亲发放了修改后的《幼儿父亲教养行为问卷》,对收回的104份有效问卷进行了验证性因素分析,最后对问卷进行了信效度检验并得到了包含22个题目的正式的《幼儿父亲教养行为问卷》;依照同样方法,,自行编制了《幼儿父子依恋行为问卷》,对155位幼儿父亲发放了《幼儿父子依恋行为问卷》进行试测,对收回的143份有效问卷进行探索性因素分析,向120名幼儿父亲发放了修改后的《幼儿父子依恋行为问卷》,对收回的95份有效问卷进行了验证性因素分析,最后对问卷进行了信效度检验并得到了包含16个题目的正式的《幼儿父子依恋行为问卷》;最终向232位幼儿父亲同时发放了两份正式问卷,探讨了两者的特点与关系,并得出以下结论: 1、从敏感性、反应性、控制性、情绪性四个维度编制的《幼儿父亲教养行为问卷》和从亲近性、焦虑性、抚慰性三个维度编制的《幼儿父子依恋行为问卷》有着较好的结构与信效度,两份问卷是可行的。 2、父亲教养行为会因父母与幼儿年龄、父母的文化程度、家庭收入状况的不同而存在差异,而不因幼儿性别、家庭结构的不同而存在差异。 3、父子依恋会因父亲的年龄、家庭收入和家庭结构的不同而存在差异,而不因母亲的年龄、幼儿的性别与年龄、父母文化程度的不同而存在差异。 4、在控制了父母与幼儿的年龄、父母文化程度、家庭收入与结构这些因素的情况下,父亲教养行为的各维度与父子依恋的各维度之间存在极其显著的相关。其中,父亲教养行为的控制性与父子依恋的亲近性之间存在显著的负相关,父亲教养行为的敏感性、反应性和情绪性与幼儿父子依恋的各个维度之间都存在极其显著的正相关。 5、父亲教养行为中的敏感性和情绪性对幼儿父子依恋的作用很大,它们能够显著正向预测父子依恋的亲近性和抚慰性,父亲教养行为中的敏感性能够显著正向预测父子依恋的焦虑性,而父亲教养行为中的反应性和控制性不能显著预测父子依恋。
[Abstract]:In this paper, the current research on father rearing behavior and paternity attachment at home and abroad is summarized, and the structure and measurement methods of father rearing behavior and paternity attachment are analyzed. On the basis of summing up the previous research experience, interviewing many child fathers and observing the families of two young children frequently, The questionnaire of parenting behavior of infant fathers was compiled by ourselves, 200 fathers were given the questionnaire of parenting behavior of young children, and 156 valid questionnaires were analyzed by exploratory factor analysis. 120 child fathers were given the revised Child rearing behavior questionnaire, and 104 valid questionnaires were analyzed by confirmatory factor analysis. Finally, the reliability and validity of the questionnaire were tested and a formal questionnaire on parenting behavior of young fathers was obtained, which included 22 topics. The questionnaire of father-son attachment behavior was compiled, 155 fathers were given out the questionnaire of father-son attachment behavior, 143 valid questionnaires were analyzed by exploratory factor analysis. 120 child fathers were given out the revised "Child paternity attachment behavior questionnaire", and 95 valid questionnaires were analyzed by confirmatory factor analysis. Finally, the reliability and validity of the questionnaire were tested, and the formal questionnaire of father-son attachment behavior was obtained, which included 16 topics. Finally, two formal questionnaires were distributed to 232 fathers at the same time, and the characteristics and relationship of the two questionnaires were discussed. The following conclusions are drawn:. 1. The questionnaire was developed from four dimensions of sensitivity, reactivity, control and emotion, and from closeness and anxiety. The questionnaire of father-son attachment developed by three dimensions of comfort has good structure and reliability, and the two questionnaires are feasible. 2. The father's rearing behavior will be different according to the age of parents and children, the parents' education level, the family income, but not the children's sex and family structure. 3. The attachment of father and son will be different with the age of father, family income and family structure, but not with the age of mother, the sex and age of infant, and the educational level of parents. 4. In the case of controlling the age of parents and young children, parents' education level, family income and structure, there is a significant correlation between the dimensions of father's upbringing behavior and the dimensions of parent-son attachment. There is a significant negative correlation between the control of father's upbringing behavior and the closeness of paternity and son attachment. The sensitivity, reactivity and emotion of father's upbringing behavior have extremely significant positive correlation with each dimension of father-son attachment. 5. The sensitivity and emotion of father's rearing behavior have great effect on the attachment of father and son, and they can predict the closeness and comfort of father and son attachment. The sensitivity of father's upbringing behavior can predict the anxiety of father's and son's attachment positively, but the reactivity and control of father's rearing behavior can't predict father's son's attachment significantly.
【学位授予单位】:鲁东大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:B844.12
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 于海琴;亲子依恋对儿童社会性发展影响的研究进展[J];华中科技大学学报(人文社会科学版);2002年01期
2 王志梅;初中生父母教养方式影响因素的研究[J];教育理论与实践;2005年18期
3 钮胜芳;;父亲教养方式的影响因素分析及其与儿童自我概念的相关研究[J];贵州师范大学学报(自然科学版);2011年02期
4 周素珍;;学前儿童父亲教养行为研究综述[J];前沿;2007年03期
5 晏红;父母对儿童性别偏爱的差异之研究[J];天津市教科院学报;2003年03期
6 纪成双;;父亲不能淡出家庭教育[J];现代家教;2000年08期
7 邬佩霞,陶沙,曾琦,王耘,董奇;2~6岁儿童的气质特点与母亲抚养困难的关系[J];心理发展与教育;1997年03期
8 刘金花;家庭研究新观点述评[J];心理科学;1996年01期
9 许岩;;父亲参与儿童教养影响因素研究述评[J];烟台师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版);2006年01期
10 王茜;陈会昌;;父母教养行为在儿童2岁和7岁时的差异及与儿童抑制性的关系[J];中国心理卫生杂志;2007年09期
本文编号:1700553
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/jiaoyujiaoxuefangfalunwen/1700553.html