教师和公务员教育投资回报率比较研究

发布时间：2018-05-09 02:21

本文选题：Mincer模型 + 制度歧视　；参考：《南京理工大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：我国现阶段公私部门之间或者公共部门内部不同群体之间的教育回报率水平是怎样的?是否存在与制度歧视相关的教育回报率差异?若有,差异到底有多大?在阅读了大量的国内外有关教育回报率的文献后,发现众多学者对我国的教育回报率进行了研究,但极少有文章对教师和公务员的教育回报率进行专门的估计并比较。本文根据相关课题的微观数据,对教师和公务员的教育回报率进行了实证分析,探究了公务员和教师的教育回报率的差异,该差异产生的原因,以及化解该差异的具体对策。本文的研究结论得到了以下几点结论：(1)教师与公务员的受教育程度普遍较高,差异并不太大,但教师部门本科以上学历人员的比例远大于公务员部门；(2)公务员的平均薪酬水平略高于教师,教育对教师和公务员薪酬收入的影响是积极的,但影响的程度有异；(3)教师和公务员的教育回报率都不高,教师的教育回报率为0.9%,公务员的教育回报率是2.2%,但相对差距比较大；(4)不同学历教育回报率的分析结果显示,教师和公务员的薪酬收入是随着教育水平的提高而递增的,高学历人员倾向于获得更高的薪酬收入；(5)分位回归结果表明,教师与公务员的教育回报率都有各自的变化趋势,在各分位点上,教师的教育回报率都明显低于公务员的水平。
[Abstract]:What is the level of return on education between the public and private sectors or between different groups within the public sector? Is there a difference in the rate of return on education related to institutional discrimination? If so, how big is the difference? After reading a large number of domestic and foreign literature on the rate of return on education, it is found that many scholars have studied the rate of return on education in China, but few articles have specifically estimated and compared the rate of return of education between teachers and civil servants. Based on the microcosmic data of related subjects, this paper makes an empirical analysis of the return on education of teachers and civil servants, and probes into the differences between the educational returns of civil servants and teachers, the causes of the differences, and the concrete countermeasures to resolve the differences. The conclusions of this paper are as follows: (1) the educational level of teachers and civil servants is generally high, but the difference is not too great. However, the proportion of teachers with undergraduate or higher degrees is much larger than that of civil servants.) the average salary level of civil servants is slightly higher than that of teachers, and the impact of education on teachers' and civil servants' salaries is positive. However, the degree of influence is different (3) the rate of return on education of both teachers and civil servants is not high. The rate of return on education for teachers is 0.9. The rate of return on education for civil servants is 2.2, but the relative gap is quite large. The salary income of teachers and civil servants is increasing with the improvement of education level. The regression results show that both teachers and civil servants have their own trend of educational return. At each locus, teachers' educational returns were significantly lower than those of civil servants.
【学位授予单位】：南京理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：G40-05

【参考文献】