中美澳教育服务贸易比较研究
发布时间:2018-05-15 20:02
本文选题:教育服务贸易 + 发展历程 ; 参考:《广西师范大学》2014年硕士论文
【摘要】:教育服务贸易作为国际服务贸易总类中的第五类,是WTO《服务贸易总协定》的一个重要领域。随着世界经济的快速发展和国际教育交流活动的日益增强,教育服务贸易在整个服务贸易领域所占的比例逐年增加,成为推动世界许多国家经济增长的重要力量。其中,美国和澳大利亚就是两个典型样本。目前,美国和澳大利亚通过各种方式、采取多种措施大力发展本国的教育服务贸易。例如开设远程教育课程;吸引大量的外国留学生到本国求学;在海外设立分校等。教育服务贸易为推动这两个国家的经济增长做出了不可忽视的贡献。2001年,我国正式成为WTO成员国,并在教育服务贸易方面做出了有关承诺。这标志着我国已经加入了国际教育服务贸易的行列,开始全方位参与国际教育服务贸易的竞争。随着国际教育市场的逐步开放,我国教育服务贸易取得了长足发展,特别是境外消费方式下的教育输入和输出量大大增加。 虽然我国教育服务贸易在近几年发展较快,但是与美国、澳大利亚等发达国家相比,我国教育服务贸易仍然处于弱势地位。为了提高我国教育服务贸易的国际竞争力,更好更快地发展我国教育服务贸易,本文拟对中美澳教育服务贸易的发展历程、政策、方式和产品等进行比较,得出结论,为我国教育服务贸易的发展提供一定的参考依据和建议。 本文的第一章主要介绍教育服务贸易的基本概念与理论基础。 本文的第二、三、四、五章对中美澳三国教育服务贸易的发展历程、政策、方式和产品,进行比较分析。 本文的第六章通过前前面的分析结论,并结合我国的实际情况提出了一些启示与建议。主要建议为:转变观念,大力发展教育服务产业;加大对教育的投入,提升教育服务贸易质量;加快高校管理体制改革,建设现代大学制度;充分发挥比较优势,抢占国际教育服务贸易市场;构建和完善教育服务贸易的法律框架。
[Abstract]:As the fifth category of the total international trade in services, education trade in services is an important field of the General Agreement on Trade in Services (WTO). With the rapid development of world economy and the increasing of international educational exchange activities, the proportion of education service trade in the whole service trade field is increasing year by year, which has become an important force to promote the economic growth of many countries in the world. Among them, the United States and Australia are two typical samples. At present, the United States and Australia through various ways, take various measures to develop their own trade in education services. For example, distance education courses; attracting a large number of foreign students to study in their home countries; setting up branches overseas, etc. In 2001, China became a member of WTO and made some commitments in the field of trade in educational services. This indicates that China has joined the ranks of international trade in educational services and has begun to participate in the competition of international trade in educational services. With the gradual opening of the international education market, China's education service trade has made great progress, especially the amount of education input and output increased greatly under the mode of overseas consumption. Although China's trade in educational services has developed rapidly in recent years, compared with the developed countries such as the United States and Australia, China's trade in educational services is still in a weak position. In order to improve the international competitiveness of China's education service trade and develop China's education service trade better and faster, this paper compares the development process, policies, methods and products of Sino-American education service trade, and draws a conclusion. It provides some references and suggestions for the development of education service trade in China. The first chapter mainly introduces the basic concepts and theoretical basis of trade in educational services. In the second, third, fourth and fifth chapters, the author makes a comparative analysis of the development course, policies, methods and products of the trade in education services between China, the United States and Australia. In the sixth chapter, the author puts forward some enlightenment and suggestions according to the actual situation of our country. The main suggestions are: changing ideas, vigorously developing education service industry, increasing investment in education, improving the quality of education service trade, speeding up the reform of university management system, building modern university system, giving full play to comparative advantage, To seize the international educational service trade market and to construct and perfect the legal framework of educational service trade.
【学位授予单位】:广西师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:G511
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 覃壮才;中国教育服务贸易承诺减让表解读[J];比较教育研究;2002年04期
2 靳希斌;国际教育服务贸易研究——规则解读与我国的承诺[J];北京师范大学学报(社会科学版);2004年01期
3 廖荣碧;;公共选择理论及其现实借鉴意义[J];当代经济;2009年02期
4 祝怀新;孙敬娜;;澳大利亚南昆士兰大学远程高等教育探析[J];中国远程教育;2006年11期
5 黄复生;;国际视野下的跨境远程教育质量保障探析[J];中国远程教育;2009年03期
6 张荷皎;陈时见;;美国国际教育的历史、多重身份与新发展[J];大学(研究与评价);2008年01期
7 赵素平;;我国教育服务贸易竞争力分析——基于迈克尔·波特的“钻石模型”[J];消费导刊;2009年19期
8 ;国务院关于《中国教育改革和发展纲要》的实施意见[J];中华人民共和国国务院公报;1994年16期
9 唐海涛;;国际教育服务贸易的发展及面临的挑战[J];北京工业大学学报(社会科学版);2012年06期
10 傅松涛;杨晓锋;;中美教育服务贸易现状的比较分析及对策[J];河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2005年05期
,本文编号:1893724
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/jiaoyujiaoxuefangfalunwen/1893724.html