温度舒适感对道德判断及道德行为的影响
本文关键词: 温度 舒适感 道德判断 道德行为 出处:《四川师范大学》2017年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:道德判断是个体以自身具有的道德认知为基础并根据一定的评价标准对自己以及他人的行为做出评价的过程,其水平是不断变化发展的。道德判断有两个重要的指标:一个是对他人道德行为的严苛程度,另一个指标是基于规则的道义论判断或考虑后果的功利性判断。个体的道德判断仅仅研究的是个体的内在观念性的态度,因此,研究真实情境中个体做出的具体而实际的道德行为更具有意义。而历来对道德行为的研究大多都是通过对亲社会行为等更为具体的行为的研究来进行的。本文采用3个单因素实验探讨了温度引起的舒适感对道德判断以及道德行为的影响。实验一采用单因素实验探讨温度舒适感对道德判断严苛性的影响,随机选取四川师范大学70名在校大学生(男生31名,女生39名)作为被试,分为温度舒适组(35人,男生16人,女生19人)和温度不舒适组(35人,男生15人,女生20人),分别对8个不道德行为的不道德程度在五点量表上进行判断。其结果表明,与不舒适的温度条件相比,被试在舒适的温度条件下会对不道德行为做出更为严苛的道德判断。实验二考察了温度舒适感对功利主义道德判断的影响,随机选取四川师范大学68名在校大学生(男生32名、女生36名)作为被试,分为温度舒适组(35人,男16人,女19人)和温度不舒适组(33人,男16人,女17人),分别对8个高冲突道德困境中的功利性行为在9点量表上进行判断。实验结果表明,在不舒适的温度条件下,被试对道德两难事件做出更功利性的道德判断。实验三采用捐款的实验范式探讨在真实的助人情境中,温度舒适感对道德行为的影响。实验结果表明,被试在不舒适的温度条件下会减少利他行为。三个实验结果共同表明,温度舒适感确实会对道德判断以及道德行为产生影响。
[Abstract]:Moral judgment is a process in which an individual evaluates the behavior of himself and others on the basis of his own moral cognition and according to certain evaluation criteria. Its level is constantly changing and developing. Moral judgment has two important indicators: one is the severity of the moral behavior of others. Another indicator is rule-based deontic judgment or utilitarian judgment based on consequences. Individual moral judgment only studies the individual's intrinsic attitude, therefore. It is more meaningful to study the specific and practical moral behaviors of individuals in real situations, while the study of moral behavior has always been carried out mostly through the study of more specific behaviors such as prosocial behavior. Three single factor experiments were used to study the effect of temperature on moral judgment and moral behavior. In experiment 1, the effect of temperature comfort on the strictness of moral judgment was investigated by single factor experiment. A total of 70 college students (31 males and 39 females) from Sichuan normal University were randomly divided into three groups: 35 in the temperature comfort group and 16 in the male group. The unethical degree of 8 immoral behaviors was judged on the five-point scale in the group of 15 boys and 20 girls. Compared with the uncomfortable temperature condition, the subjects will make more severe moral judgment on the immoral behavior under the comfortable temperature condition. The second experiment examines the influence of the temperature comfort on the utilitarian moral judgment. Sixty-eight college students (32 males and 36 females) from Sichuan normal University were randomly divided into three groups: 35 in the temperature comfort group, 16 in the male group and 19 in the female group, and 33 in the temperature uncomfortable group. The utilitarian behaviors in 8 moral dilemmas of high conflict were judged on the scale of 9 points by 16 males and 17 females. The experimental results showed that under the uncomfortable temperature conditions. Subjects made a more utilitarian moral judgment on moral dilemmas. Experiment three used the experimental paradigm of donation to explore the effect of temperature comfort on moral behavior in real helping situations. The results of three experiments show that temperature comfort does influence moral judgment and moral behavior.
【学位授予单位】:四川师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:B844.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 傅鑫媛;陆智远;寇_g;;陌生他人在场及其行为对个体道德伪善的影响[J];心理学报;2015年08期
2 陈潇;江琦;侯敏;朱梦音;;具身道德:道德心理学研究的新取向[J];心理发展与教育;2014年06期
3 殷融;叶浩生;;道德概念的黑白隐喻表征及其对道德认知的影响[J];心理学报;2014年09期
4 喻春雨;费彬;缪亚健;李艳;;制冷设备对人体舒适温度影响的研究[J];环境技术;2014年01期
5 郑睦凡;赵俊华;;权力如何影响道德判断行为:情境卷入的效应[J];心理学报;2013年11期
6 王锃;鲁忠义;;道德概念的垂直空间隐喻及其对认知的影响[J];心理学报;2013年05期
7 张恩涛;方杰;林文毅;罗俊龙;;抽象概念表征的具身认知观[J];心理科学进展;2013年03期
8 殷融;曲方炳;叶浩生;;“右好左坏”和“左好右坏”——利手与左右空间情感效价的关联性[J];心理科学进展;2012年12期
9 彭凯平;喻丰;;道德的心理物理学:现象、机制与意义[J];中国社会科学;2012年12期
10 阎书昌;;身体洁净与道德[J];心理科学进展;2011年08期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 杨青;吴小常;周欣悦;;干净钱和脏钱在态度、价值和人际行为方面的差异效应[A];心理学与创新能力提升——第十六届全国心理学学术会议论文集[C];2013年
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 郭瑞;清洁启动对道德判断的影响[D];湖南师范大学;2014年
2 栾子烟;道德温度:身体冷暖与青少年道德决策[D];华东师范大学;2013年
3 许闯;道德人格的隐喻表征维度研究[D];广西师范大学;2012年
,本文编号:1463951
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/jiaoyutizhilunwen/1463951.html