12～18岁留守儿童亲社会行为倾向及其与主观健康水平的关系

发布时间：2018-03-02 22:07

本文选题：儿童　切入点：留守儿童　出处：《中国全科医学》2016年12期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：目的探讨12~18岁留守儿童亲社会行为倾向及其与主观健康水平的关系。方法 2012年12月—2014年6月,根据纳入与排除标准,选取中国科学院心理研究所承担的国家科技支撑计划——《社会变迁过程中儿童青少年的心理发展特点及心理问题疏导与咨询技术》项目中的8 029例儿童为调查对象。项目组采用统一编制的人口学问卷和青少年亲社会行为倾向量表(PTM)对我国东北、华北、西北、华中、西南、华南和华东7个区域的儿童进行了问卷调查。根据是否为留守儿童分为留守组(2 103例)和非留守组(5 926例)。记录各组儿童的一般资料(包括性别、年龄、地区)、亲社会行为倾向得分和主观健康水平。结果两组儿童年龄分布、地区分布、主观健康水平比较,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。非留守组和留守组儿童PTM总分均随年龄的增长先下降后上升。在PTM总分、公开维度得分、匿名维度得分上,组别主效应和年龄主效应均显著(P0.05);组别与年龄有交互作用(P0.05)。在利他维度得分、依从维度得分、情绪性维度得分、紧急性维度得分上,组别主效应不显著(P0.05);年龄主效应显著(P0.05);组别与年龄有交互作用(P0.05)。在PTM总分、公开维度得分、利他维度得分、依从维度得分、情绪性维度得分、紧急性维度得分上,组别主效应和地区主效应均显著(P0.05);组别与地区有交互作用(P0.05)。在匿名维度得分上,组别主效应和地区主效应均显著(P0.05);组别与地区无交互作用(P0.05)。在PTM总分、公开维度得分、匿名维度得分、利他维度得分、依从维度得分、情绪性维度得分、紧急性维度得分上,组别主效应不显著(P0.05);主观健康水平主效应显著(P0.05);组别与主观健康水平无交互作用(P0.05)。留守组、非留守组PTM总分与主观健康水平均呈正相关(r=0.099、0.077,P0.01)。结论留守儿童亲社会行为倾向随年龄的增长先下降后上升;年龄、地区和主观健康水平对留守儿童亲社会行为倾向均有显著影响;主观健康水平越高,留守儿童亲社会行为倾向越高。
[Abstract]:Objective to investigate the relationship between 12~18 years of left behind children's prosocial behavior tendency and subjective health. Methods from December 2012 to June 2014, according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, selection of characteristics and psychological problems of psychological support development undertaken by the Institute of Psychology.CAS National Science and technology program -- "in the process of social changes of children youth counseling and consultation project technology > in 8029 cases children as the object of investigation. The project group according to the constructed demographic questionnaire and the adolescents' prosocial behavior tendency scale (PTM) in Northeast China, North China, northwest, central, South West, East Southern China and 7 regional children conducted a questionnaire survey. According to whether the left-behind children are divided into groups (2103 cases left behind) and non left behind group (5926 cases). The general information of the record of each child (including gender, age, region), pro social behavior scores and subjective health level. Two groups of children age distribution, region distribution, subjective health level, the difference was statistically significant (P0.05). The group of children left behind and non left behind group PTM score increase with age decreased and then increased. The total score of PTM, scores of open, anonymous score, group main effect and main effect of age was significantly (P0.05); group interaction with age (P0.05). The scores of the scores of altruism, compliance, emotional dimension scores, urgency score, group main effect was not significant (P0.05); the main effect of age was significantly (P0.05); group interaction with age (P0.05). The total score of PTM. Open the scores, the scores of scores of altruism, compliance, emotional dimension scores, urgency score, group main effect and area of the main effects are significant (P0.05); group and regional interaction (P0.05). In the anonymous score, group main effect And the area of the main effects are significant (P0.05); no interaction between groups and regions (P0.05). The total score of PTM, scores of open, anonymous scores, scores of scores of altruism, compliance, emotional dimension scores, urgency score, group main effect was not significant (P0.05); subjective health level a significant main effect (P0.05); no interaction between groups and subjective health level (P0.05). Left behind group, non left behind group the PTM score and subjective health level were positively correlated (r=0.099,0.077, P0.01). Conclusion the left-behind children prosocial behavior tendency with the increase of age decreased first and then increased; age, area and subjective health level of left-behind children prosocial behavior significantly affect subjective health; the higher the level of left-behind children prosocial behavior is higher.

【作者单位】：中国科学院心理研究所;中国科学院大学;Aalborg
【基金】：国家科技支撑计划项目(2012BAI36B00)
【分类号】：B844.1

【相似文献】