青少年共情能力现状及相关因素

发布时间：2018-03-05 13:36

本文选题：青少年　切入点：共情能力　出处：《中国心理卫生杂志》2017年11期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：目的:了解青少年共情能力发展的现状,并探讨青少年共情能力的相关影响因素。方法:选取淮南市、温州市的部分中学和中职学校,共发放问卷1460份,回收有效问卷1159份(男613例,女546例)。采用中文版人际反应指标(IRI-C)、家庭功能评定量表(FAD)、《我的班级》问卷分别评估青少年的共情能力、家庭功能以及班级环境。结果:女生的IRI-C情绪共情、认知共情以及总共情[(55±12)vs.(51±11)]得分均高于男生[(50±11)vs.(54±11),(50±11)vs.(54±11),(均P0.05)]。中职生的IRI-C情绪共情、认知共情以及总共情得分均低于初中生和高中生(均P0.05)。《我的班级》问卷的竞争得分、同学关系得分与IRI-C的情绪共情得分正向关联(β=0.11、0.13,均P0.001);FAD的角色得分与IRI-C的情绪共情得分正向关联(β=0.14,P0.001);FAD的问题解决得分与认知共情得分、总共情得分负向关联(β=-0.22、-5.20,均P0.001)。《我的班级》问卷的同学关系得分与认知共情得分、总共情得分正向关联(β=0.18、5.76,均P0.001)。结论:女生的共情能力发展可能优于男生;与初中生、高中生相比,中职生的共情能力发展可能较差;良好的同学关系、有效的问题解决、适度的竞争可能是青少年共情发展的有利因素。
[Abstract]:Objective: to understand the development status of teenagers empathy, and to explore the related factors of adolescent empathy. Methods: select the Huainan City, Wenzhou City, part of the high school and secondary vocational schools, a total of 1460 questionnaires, 1159 valid questionnaires (male 613 cases, female 546 cases). The Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI-C Chinese version), family function scale (FAD) respectively, < my class > questionnaire assessed the adolescents' empathy ability, family function and class environment. Results: girls IRI-C emotional empathy, cognitive empathy and the total feeling [(55 + 12) vs. (51 + 11) scores were higher than boys [] (50. 11) vs. (54 + 11), (50 + 11) vs. (54 + 11), (P0.05) IRI-C. The secondary vocational students emotional empathy, emotion cognitive empathy and the total scores were lower than that of middle and high school student (P0.05) questionnaire. The class > my competition score, the positive correlation of emotion the relationship between students empathy score and IRI-C score (beta =0.11,0.13, P0.001); the positive correlation of emotional empathy score and the scores of the FAD IRI-C role (beta =0.14, P0.001); the FAD problem solving and the scores of cognitive empathy score, total score. Negative correlation (beta =-0.22, -5.20, P0.001), and the scores of cognitive empathy score questionnaire between class >. My love, a total score of positive correlation (beta =0.18,5.76, P0.001). Conclusion: empathy development may be better than boys and girls; junior high school students, high school students, vocational students' empathy ability development may be poor; the good relations between students, solve problems, moderate competition may be advantageous factors for juvenile empathy development.

【作者单位】：温州大学教师教育学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金教育学一般课题“我国当代青少年公益行为研究”(BHA140080)阶段性成果浙江省新苗人才计划项目(KZ1609048)研究成果温州大学研究生创新基金项目(3162015009)研究成果
【分类号】：B844.2

【相似文献】