当前位置:主页 > 教育论文 > 教育体制论文 >

简式UPPS-P冲动行为量表在大学生中的信度效度检测

发布时间:2018-03-27 13:11

  本文选题:大学生 切入点:冲动行为量表 出处:《中国临床心理学杂志》2017年04期


【摘要】:目的:检验简式UPPS-P冲动行为量表(Short Version of the UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale,S-UPPS-P)在大学生中的信度和效度。方法:调查725名大学生,回收有效问卷693份,并在四周后随机选取116名大学生进行重测。另用UPPS冲动行为量表检验内容效度,用Barratt冲动量表(BIS-11)、米氏边缘性人格障碍检测表(MSI-BPD)与Buss和Perry攻击问卷中文版(AQ-CV)检验效标关联效度。结果:S-UPPS-P中文版包括负性急迫性、缺乏坚持性、缺乏预见性、感觉寻求和正性急迫性5个因子,共20个条目;总问卷的内部一致性信度和重测信度都为0.77,五个维度的内部一致性信度分别为0.67、0.69、0.71、0.69、0.80,重测信度分别为0.77、0.65、0.63、0.66、0.75,合成信度分别为0.80、0.81、0.85、0.82、0.87;验证性因素分析结果显示五因素模型拟合良好(χ~2/df=2.41,NFI=0.90,CFI=0.94,IFI=0.94,TLI=0.93,RMSEA=0.05);量表总分与UPPS、BIS-11、MSI-BPD、AQ-CV得分呈正相关(r=0.60、0.53、0.26、0.34,均P0.01)。结论:S-UPPS-P中文版具有良好的信度和效度,可以用于评估中国大学生的冲动性。
[Abstract]:Objective: to test the reliability and validity of short Version of the UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior scale S-UPPS-P in college students. Methods: 725 college students were investigated and 693 valid questionnaires were collected. After four weeks, 116 college students were randomly selected for retest, and the content validity was tested by UPPS impulsive behavior scale. Barratt impulse scale (BIS-11P), MSI-BPDand Buss and Perry aggression questionnaire were used to test the validity of the efficacy criteria. Results the Chinese version of the Chinese version of the Chinese version of the Chinese version of the Perry aggression questionnaire included negative urgency, lack of persistence, and lack of predictability, and the Chinese version included negative urgency, lack of persistence, and lack of predictability, and the Chinese version of the questionnaire showed negative urgency, lack of persistence, and lack of predictability. Sensory search and positive urgency 5 factors, a total of 20 entries; The internal consistency reliability and retest reliability of the total questionnaire were both 0.77, the internal consistency reliability of the five dimensions were 0.67 / 0. 69 / 0. 79 / 0.80, the retest reliability were 0. 77 / 0. 653 / 0. 663 / 0. 75, and the composite reliability were 0. 800. 81 / 0. 852 / 0. 87 respectively. The results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that the five factor models fitted well. Good (蠂 ~ 2 / 2 / dft 2.41 / NFI = 0.90 / CFI = 0.94TLI = 0.93TLI = 0.93RMSEAA = 0.055.The total score of the scale was positively correlated with the score of UPPSBIS-11MSI-BPDV AQ-CV 0.600.600.530.260.34, all P0.01.Conclusion the Chinese version of ": S-UPPS-P" has good reliability and validity, and the total score of the scale is positively correlated with the score of UPPSBIS-11MSI-BPD-AQ-CV. It can be used to evaluate the impulsiveness of Chinese college students.
【作者单位】: 山西医科大学人文社会科学学院;
【基金】:2015年度教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(15YJA190009)
【分类号】:G444

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前4条

1 赵美荣,李玉香,陈卫,刘遂成,吕宝良;635名郑州市“儿童适应行为量表”测查分析[J];中国行为医学科学;1998年01期

2 韦小满;儿童适应行为量表的编制与标准化[J];心理发展与教育;1996年04期

3 何定武;深圳市4~6岁儿童Conners行为量表得分分析[J];健康心理学杂志;2003年01期

4 郭兰婷,单友荷,张惠开,张秋水,赵小菲;AAMD儿童适应行为量表的初步试用[J];中国临床心理学杂志;1998年01期

相关会议论文 前1条

1 张雨霖;陈学志;邱发忠;徐芝君;;国中教师创造力教学行为量表之编制与相关研究[A];全国教育与心理统计与测量学术年会暨第八届海峡两岸心理与教育测验学术研讨会论文摘要集[C];2008年



本文编号:1671654

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/jiaoyutizhilunwen/1671654.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户93976***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com