当前位置:主页 > 教育论文 > 教育体制论文 >

阿普尔教师课程权力观研究

发布时间:2018-06-27 05:44

  本文选题:阿普尔 + 批判 ; 参考:《湖南科技大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:从80年代后期开始,人们对应试教育关注逐步增强,开始反思应试教育所带来的弊端,并提出教育要向素质教育、全面发展的方向转变,这意味着人们已经开始关注学校对于人们综合素质的培养作用,开始关注教育的真正内涵。迈克尔·阿普尔,当代美国批判教育学派的杰出代表,在全球教育学界也享有盛誉。他的著作大多数是论述教育改革和文化与权力关系。在论及教师课程权力的问题时,阿普尔将其置于整个社会经济、政治和文化、权力的领域中,在探讨当前美国教育问题的根源以及教师课程权力缺失等问题上,以其独特的理论视角进行了深刻而有力的批判。本文通过分析阿普尔的课程理论,探究其对教师课程权力问题的研究,对我们解读当前美国教育中存在的问题提供了新的视角,具有十分深远的意义。全文共分为四个部分:第一部分为绪论,简述了选题缘由及意义、研究方法和思路,并对研究阿普尔的相关文献进行归纳分析。第二部分是对当代教师课程权力缺失问题进行分析,去技能化的教学和被侵占的话语权是其具体表征,并从霸权主义的控制和右翼联盟的思想控制两个角度进行原因分析。在分析教师课程权力缺失的表征和归因的基础上,引发了当代教师课程权力的呼唤。第三部分是阿普尔的教师课程权力观,此部分对教师课程权力的本质、来源、实施等方面进行分析。阿普尔将课程看作是一种动态的建构过程,他认为教师的课程权力就是教师在一定的课程场域内,利用自身的课程知识对可利用的资源进行整合,能够享有自主展开课程活动以及对课程其他主体产生影响或支配的权力。教师作为课程的组织者、实施者和建设者,其课程权力就是想要成为课程改革的重要参与者,只有通过自身努力争夺课程权力,才能保障自身权益,创造性地实施课程,最大限度地满足学生和社会对课程的要求。并对保守联盟的意识形态渗透进行批判,呼唤为教师赋权。第四部分是阿普尔教师课程权力观的启示,他认为教师的首要任务就是寻求自身的解放,通过争取话语权来争取教师的课程权力,以此才能构建自由、平等的民主教育,并提出民主教育的构想。阿普尔的批判思想中既有对美国新保守主义控制课程的批判,也有对自由平等的民主教育的追求,更重要的是他对不平等教育的批判精神。在课程改革进行得如火如荼的今天,学习和借鉴阿普尔的批判课程理论是十分有价值的,课程改革中必然会有许多的艰难险阻,我们仍然要勇于面对、勇往直前,并且能够对过去已有的经验进行批判,方可推陈出新。
[Abstract]:Since the late 1980s, people have paid more and more attention to exam-oriented education, started to reflect on the disadvantages brought about by exam-oriented education, and proposed that education should be changed to the direction of quality education and all-round development. This means that people have begun to pay attention to the role of schools in the cultivation of people's comprehensive quality and the true connotation of education. Michael Appley, an outstanding representative of contemporary American critical school of education, is also renowned in the field of global pedagogy. Most of his books deal with educational reform and the relationship between culture and power. When it comes to the issue of teacher curriculum power, Apple puts it in the field of social economy, politics and culture, power, and discusses the root causes of the current American educational problems and the lack of teachers' curriculum power, and so on. With its unique theoretical perspective to carry out a profound and powerful criticism. By analyzing Apple's curriculum theory and exploring its research on teacher's curriculum power, this paper provides a new angle of view for us to interpret the existing problems in American education, which is of great significance. The paper is divided into four parts: the first part is the introduction, briefly describes the reason and significance of the topic, research methods and ideas, and the related literature on the study of Apple are summarized and analyzed. The second part is to analyze the problem of the contemporary teachers' lack of curriculum power, which is characterized by the disskill teaching and the encroached discourse power, and analyzes the reasons from the control of hegemonism and the ideological control of right-wing alliance. On the basis of analyzing the characteristics and attribution of teachers' curriculum power deficiency, it triggered the call of contemporary teachers' curriculum power. The third part is Apple's view of teacher's curriculum power, which analyzes the nature, source and implementation of teacher's curriculum power. Apple regards curriculum as a kind of dynamic construction process. He thinks that teachers' curriculum power is to integrate the available resources with their own curriculum knowledge in a certain field of curriculum. Ability to develop curriculum activities independently and to influence or dominate other subjects of the curriculum. As the organizers, implementers and builders of the curriculum, teachers' curriculum power is to become an important participant in curriculum reform. Only by striving for curriculum power through their own efforts, can teachers guarantee their own rights and interests and creatively implement the curriculum. To the maximum extent possible to meet the requirements of students and society on the curriculum. It also criticizes the ideological infiltration of conservative alliance and calls for the empowerment of teachers. The fourth part is the enlightenment of Apple-teacher 's view of curriculum power. He thinks that the primary task of teachers is to seek their own emancipation and to strive for teachers' curriculum power by fighting for the right to speak, so as to build a free and equal democratic education. And put forward the idea of democratic education. In his critical thought, he not only criticizes the control curriculum of American neoconservatism, but also the pursuit of democratic education of freedom and equality, and more importantly, he criticizes the spirit of unequal education. At a time when curriculum reform is in full swing, it is very valuable to study and learn from Apple's critical curriculum theory. There are bound to be many difficulties and difficulties in curriculum reform. We still have to face it bravely and move forward bravely. And can carry on the criticism to the past already experience, can bring forth the old and new.
【学位授予单位】:湖南科技大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:G423

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 徐玲;;美国教育批判种族理论的研究综述[J];民族教育研究;2013年02期

2 王占魁;;阿普尔批判教育研究的理论来源[J];华东师范大学学报(教育科学版);2012年02期

3 韩喜平;吴宏正;;主流意识形态的坚守与马克思主义的发展[J];高校理论战线;2012年05期

4 王占魁;;阿普尔批判教育研究的批判逻辑[J];教育研究;2012年04期

5 洪志忠;;批判教育研究的原旨、演展和社会权力架构——美国威斯康星大学阿普尔教授访谈[J];全球教育展望;2011年02期

6 彭礼;周险峰;;论批判理论视域下课程知识的选择[J];当代教育理论与实践;2011年01期

7 刘琼;;教科书政治学——论阿普尔的教科书政治属性[J];世界教育信息;2010年01期

8 林晖;;阿普尔教育哲学思想中的“合法知识”与“意识形态”问题[J];马克思主义与现实;2007年03期

9 葛春;吴永军;;官方知识的政治——论阿普尔的课程改革观[J];上海教育科研;2006年08期

10 王成善;周作宇;;阿普尔课程知识话语解读:意识形态遮蔽与解蔽[J];内蒙古师范大学学报(教育科学版);2006年07期

相关博士学位论文 前1条

1 应建庆;教育中的知识合法性[D];复旦大学;2011年

相关硕士学位论文 前4条

1 盛凡睿;阿普尔的课程理论研究[D];吉林大学;2015年

2 张义民;阿普尔批判教育理论课程观研究[D];山东师范大学;2013年

3 董智慧;阿普尔批判课程理论研究[D];华中科技大学;2013年

4 辛治洋;论阿普尔教育理论的批判性[D];西南师范大学;2003年



本文编号:2072874

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/jiaoyutizhilunwen/2072874.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户a1a33***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com