隔代亲合与农村留守青少年的抑郁、生活满意度:逆境信念的中介作用
[Abstract]:Because the parents have long been working outside, the young people in rural areas have long lived in the adverse environment of the lack of parents and relatives. The study shows that the negative emotional level of the young people in rural areas is significantly higher than that of the non left behind adolescents (Zhao, LiuWang, 2015). However, more and more researchers have realized that mental health is not only without psychological disease, but also should include positive mental health status such as high life satisfaction. Therefore, to better understand the youth left behind in rural areas. This study not only discusses the protection mechanism of reducing the negative emotions of the young left behind in rural areas, but also studies the protective factors and mechanisms of their positive emotions. The main caregivers of young people, the positive emotional link between the grandparents and the youngsters plays an important role in the active adaptation of the youngsters. Therefore, this study chooses the parents of the parents to stay away as a sample, and pays attention to the influence of the two protective factors on their depression and life satisfaction, and the two protective factors. At the same time, the study will also take the non retained youth group as the control group to explore the possible differences between the two types of adolescents in each variable and the mechanism of action. 204 adolescents and 259 non retained adolescents were measured by the intergenerational affinity, adversity belief, depression and life satisfaction scale. We examined the characteristics of two types of adolescents' intergeneration, adversity belief, depression and life satisfaction, and examined the direct prediction of two types of adolescent depression and life satisfaction, and discussed the mediating mechanism and the possible difference between the adversity belief of two types of adolescents in the intergeneration and depression and the life satisfaction. The main results are as follows: 1. there is a difference in the level of adversity belief between the teenagers and the non staying young people, and the level of adversity belief is significantly higher than that of the two parents, and there is no significant difference in the level of depression and life satisfaction between the two parents and those of the non left behind adolescents. There was significant negative correlation and positive correlation with life satisfaction, and there was a significant positive correlation between intergeneration and adversity belief, and there was a significant negative correlation between adversity belief and depression, and a significant positive correlation with survival satisfaction in.3. generation was significant. The higher the level of depression, the higher the level of Intergeneration affinity, the lower the level of depression in the two types of adolescents, the higher the level of life satisfaction, the higher the level of Intergeneration affinity and the life satisfaction water of the two types of adolescents. Further studies have found that the direct prediction of depression and life satisfaction is higher than that of non left behind adolescents..4. adversity belief has a mediating role in the intergeneration and depression, while adversity belief has a mediating role of.5. adversity belief in the next generation. The difference in the mediating role of combination and depression exists in the left behind category. The differences in the retention category are all manifested in the prediction path of the adversity belief, that is, the influence of the next generation of parents on the adversity belief is greater than that of the non left behind teenagers, and the promotion effect of the next generation of parents on the adversity belief of the two parents is greater in.6.. The mediating model of adversity belief and life satisfaction was tested among the adolescents and non staying adolescents. It was found that adversity belief could only predict life satisfaction in the two groups, and the mediating effect of adversity belief did not reach a significant level in the two groups.
【学位授予单位】:山东师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:B844.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 赵景欣;张婷;林玲玉;;隔代亲合与农村留守儿童的抑郁:留守烦恼认知评价的中介作用[J];中国临床心理学杂志;2016年06期
2 李白璐;边玉芳;;初中生生活满意度的发展趋势及社会支持、自尊的影响:一项3年追踪研究[J];中国临床心理学杂志;2016年05期
3 魏军锋;;留守儿童的社会支持与生活满意度——希望与应对方式的多重中介效应[J];中国心理卫生杂志;2015年05期
4 张莉;王乾宇;赵景欣;;养育者支持、逆境信念与农村留守儿童孤独感的关系[J];中国临床心理学杂志;2014年02期
5 赵景欣;刘霞;张文新;;同伴拒绝、同伴接纳与农村留守儿童的心理适应:亲子亲合与逆境信念的作用[J];心理学报;2013年07期
6 全国妇联课题组;;全国农村留守儿童 城乡流动儿童状况研究报告[J];中国妇运;2013年06期
7 段成荣;吕利丹;郭静;王宗萍;;我国农村留守儿童生存和发展基本状况——基于第六次人口普查数据的分析[J];人口学刊;2013年03期
8 李志;邹雄;朱鹏;;农村留守儿童隔代监护人胜任特征的实证研究[J];中国健康心理学杂志;2013年03期
9 刘云;赵振国;;隔代教养对学前儿童情绪调节策略的影响[J];学前教育研究;2013年02期
10 梁宝勇;;心理健康素质测评系统·基本概念、理论与编制构思[J];心理与行为研究;2012年04期
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 杨萍;行为自主决策、亲子亲合与个体主观幸福感的关系[D];山东师范大学;2016年
2 叶晓璐;隔代抚养幼儿的心理理论、祖孙依恋、同伴接纳的特点及其关系研究[D];浙江师范大学;2011年
,本文编号:2149337
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/jiaoyutizhilunwen/2149337.html