实证研究怎么做:让研究者困惑的地方——来自华东师大第二届全国教育实证研究论坛的启示

发布时间：2018-10-11 08:13

【摘要】："第二届全国教育实证研究论坛"于2016年10月在华东师范大学举行,本届论坛重点围绕"怎么做实证研究"进行对话,展现了多样性的"怎么做"的实证研究成果。华东师大袁振国教授认为,我的信念,就是没有不能用实证方法研究的东西,关键在于能不能够有好的设计,能不能够找到好的方法。实证研究怎么做,是让研究者困惑的地方。这届论坛给我们呈现以下启示:一是实证研究议题以解决问题为要旨。这就要求研究的议题必须蕴含理论的、实践的和逻辑的价值,即"值得研究",而不是充满矛盾、无需证明的伪问题。二是实证方法实践内化为一种学术自觉。实证首先是一种实证思想,然后才是方法。实证研究必须从专业化的角度来提升实证方法的实质规范,这需要研究者在研究实践中不断反思、沉淀和提升。三是数据分析体现研究者的学术底蕴和智慧。实证研究就是要揭示事物之间的因果关系,科学的数据分析才能有一个确定的结论,这还需要研究者自身的经验与智慧不断在原始资料与已有理论之间进行假设、验证和建构。四是有价值的研究议题必须有经得起考验的诠释。这样的诠释才能避免研究结果解释方面存在的解释牵强和阐释肤浅的问题,甚至存在的数据分析过程复杂但研究结果无需证明的矛盾与尴尬。
[Abstract]:The second National Forum on empirical Research in Education was held at East China normal University in October 2016. This forum focuses on the dialogue of "how to do empirical research" and shows the diverse "how to do" empirical research results. Professor Yuan Zhenguo of East China normal University believes that my belief is that there is nothing that cannot be studied with empirical methods. The key is whether there can be good design and whether good methods can be found. Empirical research on how to do, is to let the researcher confused place. This forum gives us the following enlightenment: first, empirical research issues to solve the problem as the main purpose. This requires that the topic of study must contain theoretical, practical and logical values, that is, "worth studying", rather than a false problem full of contradictions and no need to prove. The other is that the practice of empirical method is internalized into an academic self-consciousness. Positivism is first an empirical thought, then a method. Empirical research must enhance the substantive norms of empirical methods from the perspective of specialization, which requires researchers to constantly reflect on, precipitate and promote in their research practice. Third, data analysis reflects the academic background and wisdom of the researchers. Empirical research is to reveal the causal relationship between things, scientific data analysis can arrive at a certain conclusion, which also requires the researcher's own experience and wisdom to constantly assume, verify and construct between the original data and the existing theory. Fourth, valuable research topics must be able to stand the test of interpretation. This kind of interpretation can avoid the problems of the interpretation of the research results which are far-fetched and superficial, and even the complicated process of the data analysis, but the contradiction and embarrassment of the research results need not be proved.
【作者单位】：《现代远程教育研究》编辑部;
【基金】：2012年度国家开放大学一般课题“远程教育期刊学术影响力控制因素与发展导向研究”(Q3304A) 四川省教育厅2014年科研项目“终身教育视角下的教育学术期刊发展途径研究”(14SB0466)
【分类号】：G40-03

【相似文献】