大学新生应对效能在心理应激与适应中的中介作用

发布时间：2018-10-21 10:10

【摘要】：目的:探讨大学新生应对效能在心理应激与适应中的中介作用。方法:本研究为纵向设计,选用中国大学生心理应激量表(CCSPSS)、中国大学生适应量表(CCSAS)和应对效能问卷(CEQ)测量267名大学新生(男137人,女130人;年龄19~21岁)心理应激水平、适应状况和应对效能,每次测量间隔2个月,共测3次。结果:CCSPSS得分与CCSAS得分、CEQ的认知维度得分呈负相关(r=-0.29~-0.08,均P0.05)、与测量时期(采用连续的虚拟变量表示)呈正相关(r=0.08,P0.05);CCSAS得分与CEQ的认知维度得分呈正相关(r=0.25,P0.01)、与测量时期呈负相关(r=-0.13,P0.01);CEQ的认知维度得分与测量时期呈负相关(r=-0.14,P0.01)。中介效应分析表明应对效能在心理应激与适应、测量时间与适应中起部分中介作用,中介效应比为45.7%、33.6%。结论:心理应激和测量时间不仅能直接作用于适应,并且通过应对效能间接作用于适应。
[Abstract]:Objective: to explore the mediating role of coping efficacy of freshmen in psychological stress and adaptation. Methods: the psychological stress level of 267 freshmen (137 males, 130 females; 1921 years old) was measured by Chinese college students' psychological stress scale (CCSPSS),) and coping efficacy questionnaire (CEQ). Adaptation and response effectiveness were measured for 3 times at intervals of 2 months. Results: there was a negative correlation between CCSPSS score and CCSAS score, CEQ cognitive dimension score (r = 0.29 卤0.08, all P 0.05), and a positive correlation between); CCSAS score and CEQ cognitive dimension score (r = 0.08); CCSAS score and CEQ cognitive dimension score) (r = 0.25p 0.01), and a negative correlation with the measurement period (P < 0.05). There was a negative correlation between the scores of cognitive dimension (r = -0.13, P 0.01) and the period of measurement (r = -0.14, P 0.01). The analysis of intermediary effect showed that coping efficacy played a part of intermediary role in psychological stress and adaptation, measuring time and adaptation, and the ratio of intermediary effect was 45.733.6. Conclusion: psychological stress and measuring time can not only directly affect adaptation, but also indirectly affect adaptation through coping efficiency.
【作者单位】：南通大学体育科学学院;常州铁道高等职业技术学校;扬州大学体育学院;
【分类号】：B844.2

【相似文献】