应试教育与素质教育岂能相容——与《应试教育与素质教育并非水火不容》作者商榷
发布时间:2019-04-17 12:10
【摘要】:《应试教育与素质教育并非水火不容》一文中所谓的应试教育,是该文作者误解了的应试教育。文章宣扬应试教育与素质教育之间的有机结合关系,是其误解应试教育的必然误判结果。应试教育有着特定的贬义内涵,考试和应试的现实合理性,并不代表应试教育有发展的需求。应试教育与素质教育具有不同的目的性本质和手段性本质,其统一性关系难以建构。在根本意义上,应试教育与素质教育的关系是价值性的,不是事实性的。而在价值性关系上,两者相互对立,水火不容。
[Abstract]:The so-called exam-oriented education in the paper "exam-oriented Education and quality-oriented Education" is the exam-oriented education misunderstood by the author. The article preaches the organic combination relationship between examination-oriented education and quality-oriented education, which is the result of misinterpretation of examination-oriented education. Examination-oriented education has a specific derogatory connotation. The realistic rationality of examination and examination does not represent the development of examination-oriented education. Examination-oriented education and quality-oriented education have different purpose-oriented nature and segmental nature, so it is difficult to construct the unity relationship between examination-oriented education and quality-oriented education. In a fundamental sense, the relationship between examination-oriented education and quality-oriented education is valuable, not factual. But in the value relation, the two are opposite each other, water and fire do not agree with each other.
【作者单位】: 岭南师范学院;
【分类号】:G521
本文编号:2459417
[Abstract]:The so-called exam-oriented education in the paper "exam-oriented Education and quality-oriented Education" is the exam-oriented education misunderstood by the author. The article preaches the organic combination relationship between examination-oriented education and quality-oriented education, which is the result of misinterpretation of examination-oriented education. Examination-oriented education has a specific derogatory connotation. The realistic rationality of examination and examination does not represent the development of examination-oriented education. Examination-oriented education and quality-oriented education have different purpose-oriented nature and segmental nature, so it is difficult to construct the unity relationship between examination-oriented education and quality-oriented education. In a fundamental sense, the relationship between examination-oriented education and quality-oriented education is valuable, not factual. But in the value relation, the two are opposite each other, water and fire do not agree with each other.
【作者单位】: 岭南师范学院;
【分类号】:G521
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李文臣;;素质教育应包含“应试能力”[J];素质教育大参考;2003年04期
2 申杨;简论学生考试的“怯场”心理及应试能力的培养[J];乐山师专学报(社会科学版);1994年02期
3 邱耀健;;素质教育与应试能力之培养并非二率背反——兼谈后进生的转化[J];中国科教创新导刊;2011年15期
4 刘炳范;素质教育与应试能力的关系[J];教育探索;1998年01期
5 章立早;;教育随想录[J];教师之友;2000年12期
6 徐金玉;;也谈素质教育应包含“应试能力”[J];希望月报(下半月);2007年09期
7 杨洪兰;谈素质教育中的能力培养[J];天津市财贸管理干部学院学报;2001年02期
8 金国庆;;我们的学生是世界一流吗?[J];成才之路;2008年08期
9 刘相臣;提高艺术类考生应试能力专业水平的重要途径[J];美术向导;1998年02期
10 江小惠;张有德;;家长期盼素质教育[J];中国教育学刊;2006年02期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 采写 实习生 刘金练 李广荣 杨涛;素质教育:永不谢幕的“话剧”[N];中山日报;2006年
,本文编号:2459417
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/jiaoyutizhilunwen/2459417.html