韩国影子教育治理政策的演变及其启示
发布时间：2019-06-15 10:20
【摘要】：自20世纪60年代至今,韩国政府对影子教育的治理政策大致经历了四次大的演变,总体趋势是:转移政策→禁止政策→补偿政策→公平政策,其本质是以再生产理论、平等主义理论以及教育本质目标理论为基础的社会公正和机会均等的力量,与以经典自由主义、新自由主义以及人力资本理论为基础的社会竞争和市场规则的力量相互博弈的结果。由于中韩两国同处于亚洲儒家文化圈,均采用以考试为中心的选拔制度,而韩国影子教育治理政策的演变又与当前我国影子教育治理政策的发展存在诸多相似点,因此,借鉴韩国影子教育治理政策的相关经验,有助于我国现阶段及未来影子教育治理政策的进一步完善。
[Abstract]:Since the 1960s, the governance policy of the Korean government on shadow education has undergone four major evolutions. the overall trend is: the transfer policy prohibits the policy of compensation and the fair policy, the essence of which is the power of social justice and equal opportunities based on reproduction theory, egalitarianism theory and the theory of essential goal of education, and the classical liberalism. The result of the game between social competition and the power of market rules based on neoliberalism and human capital theory. Because both China and South Korea are in the Asian Confucian cultural circle, both adopt the examination-centered selection system, and the evolution of the shadow education governance policy in South Korea has many similarities with the development of the shadow education governance policy in our country at present. Therefore, drawing lessons from the relevant experience of the shadow education governance policy in Korea is helpful to the further improvement of the shadow education governance policy in our country at present and in the future.
【作者单位】： 东北师范大学教育学部;
【基金】：教育部民族教育发展中心2013年度课题“合理的跨越:我国西部民族地区转变教育发展方式的理论与行动研究”(课题批准号:RDLL13001)
【分类号】：G531.26
本文编号：2500147
[Abstract]:Since the 1960s, the governance policy of the Korean government on shadow education has undergone four major evolutions. the overall trend is: the transfer policy prohibits the policy of compensation and the fair policy, the essence of which is the power of social justice and equal opportunities based on reproduction theory, egalitarianism theory and the theory of essential goal of education, and the classical liberalism. The result of the game between social competition and the power of market rules based on neoliberalism and human capital theory. Because both China and South Korea are in the Asian Confucian cultural circle, both adopt the examination-centered selection system, and the evolution of the shadow education governance policy in South Korea has many similarities with the development of the shadow education governance policy in our country at present. Therefore, drawing lessons from the relevant experience of the shadow education governance policy in Korea is helpful to the further improvement of the shadow education governance policy in our country at present and in the future.
【作者单位】： 东北师范大学教育学部;
【基金】：教育部民族教育发展中心2013年度课题“合理的跨越:我国西部民族地区转变教育发展方式的理论与行动研究”(课题批准号:RDLL13001)
【分类号】：G531.26
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前4条
1 尹伟中;政策设计[J];中国远程教育;2004年20期
2 苏君阳;;私立学校治理政策的演变及其权力格局的合理重构[J];民办教育研究;2004年05期
3 张玲玲;曹辉;;义务教育阶段“择校热”:学理反思与政策治理[J];河北师范大学学报(教育科学版);2014年05期
4 ;[J];;年期
，本文编号：2500147
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/jiaoyutizhilunwen/2500147.html
