不同学业成绩初中生心理健康的比较研究

发布时间：2018-05-18 14:56

本文选题：初中生 + 学习优秀生　；参考：《社会心理科学》2009年06期

【摘要】：目的比较不同学业成绩初中生心理健康水平的差异,力求为学校开展有针对性的心理健康教育提供参考与依据。方法采用王极盛教授编制的《初中生心理健康量表(MSSMHS)》,对重庆市三所中学400名初中生的心理健康状况进行测查。结果①不同学业成绩初中生之间测试分值在总体上差异不显著,但在学习压力、心理不平衡和情绪不平衡3个因子上差异显著;②不同学业成绩初中生之间测试分值的性别差异显著,另外,在男生之间总体差异不显著,女生之间总体差异显著,主要表现在学习压力、适应不良和情绪不平衡3个因子上,学习优秀生测试分值低于学习中等生和学习后进生,而中等生与后进生间差异不显著。结论不同学业成绩初中生心理健康水平虽在总体上差异不显著,但在某些因子上存在显著差异;不同学业成绩初中生之间心理健康水平的差异在性别上表现出不同的特点。
[Abstract]:Objective to compare the difference of mental health level among junior middle school students with different academic achievement, and to provide reference and basis for the school to carry out targeted mental health education. Methods the mental health status of 400 junior middle school students in three middle schools in Chongqing was investigated by using the Mental Health scale of Junior Middle School (MSSMHS) developed by Professor Wang Jisheng. Results (1) there was no significant difference in test scores among junior middle school students in different academic achievements, but there were significant differences in three factors: learning stress, psychological imbalance and emotional imbalance; (2) there were significant gender differences in test scores among junior high school students with different academic achievements. In addition, there was no significant difference between boys and girls, which were mainly reflected in three factors: learning stress, maladjustment and emotional imbalance. The test scores of the excellent students were lower than those of the secondary students and the underachievers, but there was no significant difference between the secondary students and the underachievers. Conclusion although there is no significant difference in mental health level of junior high school students with different academic achievement, there are significant differences in some factors, and the differences of mental health level among junior high school students in different academic achievement show different characteristics in gender.
【分类号】：B844.2

【相似文献】