美国联邦政府教育管理市场化改革探析
发布时间：2018-08-18 19:35
【摘要】：能否将市场机制引入教育管理,哈耶克、弗里德曼、丘伯等人的回答是肯定的。上世纪40年代后,美国联邦政府在不断加强教育管理的同时,将市场机制引入了教育管理:大学基础研究的合同拨款成为美国联邦政府的一项永久政策,为大学的研究生教育、实验室建设及美国研究型大学的产生和问鼎世界一流水平做出了切实的贡献;教育凭证、特许学校、绩效拨款等强调经济理性的教育改革,为美国基础教育注入了活力,有效地提高了美国基础教育的质量。
[Abstract]:Whether the market mechanism can be introduced into education management, Hayek, Friedman, Chauber and others answer yes. After the 1940s, the federal government of the United States, while continuously strengthening education management, introduced the market mechanism into education management: the contract grant for university basic research became a permanent policy of the United States federal government, for the postgraduate education of universities. Laboratory construction and the emergence of research universities in the United States and their achievement in the world's first-class level have made a real contribution. Educational reforms, such as educational vouchers, charter schools, performance grants, and so on, which emphasize economic rationality, have injected vitality into basic education in the United States. Effectively improve the quality of basic education in the United States.
【作者单位】： 吉林大学高等教育研究所;
【分类号】：G571.2
[Abstract]:Whether the market mechanism can be introduced into education management, Hayek, Friedman, Chauber and others answer yes. After the 1940s, the federal government of the United States, while continuously strengthening education management, introduced the market mechanism into education management: the contract grant for university basic research became a permanent policy of the United States federal government, for the postgraduate education of universities. Laboratory construction and the emergence of research universities in the United States and their achievement in the world's first-class level have made a real contribution. Educational reforms, such as educational vouchers, charter schools, performance grants, and so on, which emphasize economic rationality, have injected vitality into basic education in the United States. Effectively improve the quality of basic education in the United States.
【作者单位】： 吉林大学高等教育研究所;
【分类号】：G571.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 张延;对西方经济学基本前提假设的研究[J];北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1998年05期
2 马健生,张艳敏;论美国教育改革的市场机制及其公平问题[J];比较教育研究;2004年05期
3 崔保师;备受争议的美国教育券制度[J];基础教育参考;2004年05期
4 姚文峰;;美国教育券制度及其蕴含的公平意义[J];当代教育论坛;2006年17期
5 高英兰;美国联邦政府对高等教育的引导机制及对我国高教体制改革的启示[J];宁夏社会科学;2001年03期
6 杨克瑞;约翰逊与美国的教育平等化改革[J];山东师范大学学报(人文社会科学版);2004年04期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 余秀兰;;弱势群体的教育支持:发达国家的理念及其嬗变[J];比较教育研究;2009年01期
2 叶赋桂;;中国的美国教育研究三十年[J];比较教育研究;2010年07期
3 李，
本文编号：2190469
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/jsxd/2190469.html
