论教师专业化与体育教师身份认同
发布时间：2019-07-01 09:27
【摘要】： 本文是在文献资料法,专家访谈法与逻辑推理法的基础之上,以教育学、社会学、体育学等学科理论为理论基础,对教师专业化的历程,概念,阶段划分,标准及研究的相关误区和批判介绍基础上,结合体育教师专业化的研究及教师身份认同的相关研究,对于教师及体育教师是否是一种专业,对于体育教师身份认同的原因及体育教师认同的内容等问题给予了回答。 并提出:教师可以是专业人员,体育教师职业可以成为专业,但是教师以及体育教师不是专业,而是一种身份。本文认为体育教师专业化的研究当中存在对于“教师专业化的理论”的“拿来”取向,缺少必要的分析与反思,并且认为在体育教师专业化研究当中过于注重体育教师的群体专业化,忽略了体育教师个体的专业发展。虽然应将专业作为体育教师职业的一种身份的认同,但是在体育教师专业化的相关研究当中笔者发现,对于怎么样成为一种专业以及为什么体育教师要将专业作为自己的身份等问题还缺少必要的反思与思考。这也是本文研究体育教师是身份认同的出发点所在。 本人认为,体育教师对于自我身份认同是促使其个体专业化发展的重要因素,体育教师自我身份认同的内容是对于“我是教师”这个问题的深刻反思与理解,同时,这也是体育教师专业化研究的前提性问题。并且对于自我身份认同的形成也是由于学科亚文化所形成的“我是体育教师”这样认同的一种否定。此外,体育教师的自我身份认同的内容应源于自我的工作特征是“教育与教学”,以及由此而对教师工作的专业自觉,这对于体育教师在体育课程改革当中的困惑抗拒,对于体育教学当中存在的“无人、无生命”现象也是一种良好的解决方法。 全文分为四个部分: 第一部分为研究的缘起与相关概念界定,主要说明了为什么研究“教师专业化与体育教师身份认同”这个题目;以及本文当中的一些重要的概念。 第二部分为对于教师专业化研究的介绍与反思,以及对于体育教师专业化相关研究的梳理与批判。 第三部分是对于教师专业化与体育教师专业化反思的基础上,结合教师身份认同的相关研究,主要说明了为什么要进行体育教师身份认同,体育教师身份认同与体育教师专业化的关联,以及体育教师身份认同什么等问题。 第四部分为本文的结语与参考文献和致谢。
[Abstract]:On the basis of literature method, expert interview method and logical reasoning method, based on the theory of pedagogy, sociology, physical education and other disciplines, this paper introduces the course, concept, stage division, standards and related misunderstandings and critical introduction of teacher specialization, combined with the research of physical education teacher specialization and the related research of teacher identity, whether teachers and physical education teachers are a kind of specialty. This paper gives answers to the reasons for the identity of physical education teachers and the contents of physical education teachers' identity. It is pointed out that teachers can be professionals and physical education teachers can become professionals, but teachers and physical education teachers are not professional, but a kind of identity. This paper holds that there is a "bring-in" orientation to the "theory of teacher specialization" in the study of physical education teacher specialization, and that there is a lack of necessary analysis and reflection, and that too much attention is paid to the group specialization of physical education teachers in the study of physical education teacher specialization, neglecting the individual professional development of physical education teachers. Although specialty should be regarded as an identity of physical education teacher profession, in the related research of physical education teacher specialization, the author finds that there is still a lack of necessary reflection and thinking on how to become a major and why physical education teachers should regard specialty as their own identity. This is also the starting point of the study of physical education teachers in this paper. In my opinion, physical education teachers' self-identity is an important factor to promote their individual professional development, and the content of physical education teachers' self-identity is a profound reflection and understanding of the problem of "I am a teacher". At the same time, this is also a prerequisite for the professional research of physical education teachers. And the formation of self-identity is also a negation of "I am a physical education teacher" formed by the subject subculture. In addition, the content of physical education teachers' self-identity should come from the "education and teaching" and the professional consciousness of teachers' work, which is also a good solution to the confusion and resistance of physical education teachers in the reform of physical education curriculum, and to the phenomenon of "no one, no life" in physical education teaching. The full text is divided into four parts: the first part is the origin of the study and the definition of related concepts, mainly explains why the study of "teacher professionalization and physical education teacher identity", as well as some important concepts in this paper. The second part is the introduction and reflection of teacher specialization research, as well as the combing and criticism of physical education teacher specialization research. The third part is on the basis of reflection on teacher specialization and physical education teacher specialization, combined with the related research of teacher identity, mainly explains why physical education teacher identity, the relationship between physical education teacher identity and physical education teacher specialization, and what physical education teacher identity and so on. The fourth part is the conclusion of this paper and references and thanks.
【学位授予单位】：东北师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：G451.1;G807.0
本文编号：2508366
[Abstract]:On the basis of literature method, expert interview method and logical reasoning method, based on the theory of pedagogy, sociology, physical education and other disciplines, this paper introduces the course, concept, stage division, standards and related misunderstandings and critical introduction of teacher specialization, combined with the research of physical education teacher specialization and the related research of teacher identity, whether teachers and physical education teachers are a kind of specialty. This paper gives answers to the reasons for the identity of physical education teachers and the contents of physical education teachers' identity. It is pointed out that teachers can be professionals and physical education teachers can become professionals, but teachers and physical education teachers are not professional, but a kind of identity. This paper holds that there is a "bring-in" orientation to the "theory of teacher specialization" in the study of physical education teacher specialization, and that there is a lack of necessary analysis and reflection, and that too much attention is paid to the group specialization of physical education teachers in the study of physical education teacher specialization, neglecting the individual professional development of physical education teachers. Although specialty should be regarded as an identity of physical education teacher profession, in the related research of physical education teacher specialization, the author finds that there is still a lack of necessary reflection and thinking on how to become a major and why physical education teachers should regard specialty as their own identity. This is also the starting point of the study of physical education teachers in this paper. In my opinion, physical education teachers' self-identity is an important factor to promote their individual professional development, and the content of physical education teachers' self-identity is a profound reflection and understanding of the problem of "I am a teacher". At the same time, this is also a prerequisite for the professional research of physical education teachers. And the formation of self-identity is also a negation of "I am a physical education teacher" formed by the subject subculture. In addition, the content of physical education teachers' self-identity should come from the "education and teaching" and the professional consciousness of teachers' work, which is also a good solution to the confusion and resistance of physical education teachers in the reform of physical education curriculum, and to the phenomenon of "no one, no life" in physical education teaching. The full text is divided into four parts: the first part is the origin of the study and the definition of related concepts, mainly explains why the study of "teacher professionalization and physical education teacher identity", as well as some important concepts in this paper. The second part is the introduction and reflection of teacher specialization research, as well as the combing and criticism of physical education teacher specialization research. The third part is on the basis of reflection on teacher specialization and physical education teacher specialization, combined with the related research of teacher identity, mainly explains why physical education teacher identity, the relationship between physical education teacher identity and physical education teacher specialization, and what physical education teacher identity and so on. The fourth part is the conclusion of this paper and references and thanks.
【学位授予单位】：东北师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：G451.1;G807.0
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 贺来;价值化的哲学: 价值 哲学 人三位一体的合理理论形态[J];长白学刊;1997年04期
2 史宁中,柳海民;教师职业专业化:2l世纪高师教育持续发展的生命力[J];高等师范教育研究;2002年05期
3 叶澜;一个真实的假问题——“师范性”与“学术性”之争的辨析[J];高等师范教育研究;1999年02期
4 陶家俊;身份认同导论[J];外国文学;2004年02期
5 陈宏友;;新课程理念下教师身份认同的重新解读[J];合肥学院学报(社会科学版);2008年02期
6 朱新卓;教师专业化的现代性困境[J];高等教育研究;2005年01期
7 孙有平;张磊;;体育教师专业化发展之困境与思考[J];杭州师范学院学报(自然科学版);2006年06期
8 徐淑琴;郅庭瑾;;教师身份的伦理思考——基于中国教师身份发展过程的分析[J];教育科学研究;2007年11期
9 朱新卓;“教师专业发展”观批判[J];教育理论与实践;2002年08期
10 车丽娜;徐继存;;我国教师专业化:历程、问题与发展[J];教育理论与实践;2008年10期
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 王成兵;当代认同危机的人学探索[D];北京师范大学;2003年
2 柳谦;教育承认与自我认同[D];南京师范大学;2008年
，本文编号：2508366
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/jykj/2508366.html
