教育部直属高校科研效率评价研究

发布时间：2018-01-18 01:13

本文关键词：教育部直属高校科研效率评价研究　出处：《江苏科技大学》2012年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：高校在国家创新体系中是科学研究的重要基地，高校已经成为重大专项核心、共性、关键技术研发的主力军之一，其核心作用日益凸显。随着国家对高等教育投入的加大，高校科研经费尤其是教育部直属高校科研经费逐年增长。因此，研究如何合理地利用现有的资源，挖掘内部潜力，提高科研质量进而提高科研绩效具有重要的理论与现实意义。科研效率是衡量科技活动绩效的核心标准，因此有必要对教育部直属高校科研投入与产出效率这一问题进行深入地研究与分析。论文分别从指标体系的概念、指标体系的构建原则以及参考文献指标体系的选取的基础上遴选出用于本研究的科研投入产出指标体系。选取64所教育部直属高校作为研究对象，，在DEA有效性分析的基础上，结合超效率DEA评价方法、交叉效率评价方法以及被引用次数法对DEA有效的决策单元进行分析，并且运用基于DEA的Malmquist生产率指数方法进行跨期生产率变动研究，实现对教育部直属高校科研效率的静态与动态的全面评价。实证分析第一部分结果显示，64所教育部直属高校整体技术效率偏低，归因于我国处于计划经济体制向市场经济体制转型阶段，没有建立以资源利用效率为导向的资源配置机制和高校自身差异导致高校没能全部处于有效前沿面上；37所DEA无效的教育部直属高校存在科研人员或者科研经费的浪费或者科研资源利用效率低的情况；在区域科研效率分析结果中显示，西部偏远地区的科研效率相对于东、中部偏低。实证分析第二部分结果显示，15所DEA有效的教育部直属高校中有4所高校为离群决策单元，被排除在DEA有效决策单元之外。运用3种评价方法对11所DEA有效的教育部直属高校进行分析，3种评价方法显示结果不尽相同，综合排序结果显示北京邮电大学科研效率最高，东北林业大学与陕西师范大学科研效率偏低。实证分析的第三部分结果显示，2005-2006年64所教育部直属高校的技术变动是生产率变动的主要因素，2006-2007年技术效率变动是生产率变动的主要原因。论文的创新点有两个，第一是在考虑到科研投入产出滞后期的基础上，运用3种方法对DEA有效的决策单元进行分析，分析结果显示运用不同方法分析DEA有效的决策单元，结果不尽相同，表明DEA有效的决策单元存在伪度，仅仅运用1种评价方法分析DEA有效的决策单元是不够的，结合不同的方法对DEA有效的决策单元进行分析将使得分析更为客观全面；第二是在论文最后运用基于DEA的Malmquist指数方法对64所教育部直属高校近年（05-07年）的生产率变动进行分析，投入数据选取05-07年的人力、财力投入，产出数据为07-09年的科研成果。
[Abstract]:Colleges and universities in the national innovation system is an important base of scientific research, colleges and universities have become a major special core, commonality, key technology research and development of one of the main forces. With the increase of national investment in higher education, the funds for scientific research in colleges and universities, especially those directly under the Ministry of Education, are increasing year by year. Therefore, how to make rational use of existing resources is studied. It is of great theoretical and practical significance to tap the internal potential, improve the quality of scientific research and then improve the performance of scientific research, and the efficiency of scientific research is the core standard to measure the performance of scientific and technological activities. Therefore, it is necessary to deeply study and analyze the efficiency of scientific research input and output in universities directly under the Ministry of Education. The paper starts with the concept of index system. On the basis of the construction principle of the index system and the selection of the reference index system, the research input-output index system for this study is selected. 64 universities directly under the Ministry of Education are selected as the research objects. On the basis of DEA validity analysis, combining super-efficiency DEA evaluation method, cross-efficiency evaluation method and cited times method to analyze the effective decision-making unit of DEA. By using the method of Malmquist productivity index based on DEA to study the intertemporal productivity change, the static and dynamic evaluation of scientific research efficiency of universities directly under the Ministry of Education is realized. The results of the first part of the empirical analysis show that the overall technical efficiency of 64 universities directly under the Ministry of Education is on the low side, which is attributed to the fact that China is in the stage of transition from planned economy system to market economy system. The lack of resource allocation mechanism oriented by resource utilization efficiency and the differences between colleges and universities lead to the failure of colleges and universities to be in the effective frontier; 37 colleges and universities directly under the Ministry of Education with ineffective DEA have the situation that the scientific research personnel or the scientific research funds are wasted or the utilization efficiency of scientific research resources is low; The results of the analysis of regional scientific research efficiency show that the scientific research efficiency in the remote areas of the west is lower than that in the east and in the middle. The results of the second part of the empirical analysis show that there are 4 outlier decision-making units in 15 DEA effective colleges and universities directly under the Ministry of Education. It was excluded from the effective decision-making unit of DEA. Three evaluation methods were used to analyze 11 colleges and universities directly under the Ministry of Education of DEA, and the results were not the same. The results show that the efficiency of Beijing University of posts and Telecommunications is the highest, and that of Northeast Forestry University and Shaanxi normal University is low. The third part of the empirical analysis shows that the technical change of 64 universities directly under the Ministry of Education in 2005-2006 is the main factor of productivity change. Technical efficiency change in 2006-2007 is the main reason for productivity change. There are two innovative points in this paper. The first is to analyze the effective decision-making unit of DEA by using three methods on the basis of taking into account the lag period of scientific research input and output. The results show that different methods are used to analyze the effective decision making units of DEA, and the results are not the same. It shows that there is a false degree in the decision making units of DEA efficiency. It is not enough to use one evaluation method to analyze the effective decision making unit of DEA. Combining different methods to analyze the effective decision making unit of DEA will make the analysis more objective and comprehensive. The second is to analyze the productivity change of 64 colleges and universities directly under the Ministry of Education in recent years by using the Malmquist index method based on DEA at the end of the paper. Input data selected from 2005-07 years of human and financial input, output data for 07-09 years of scientific research results.
【学位授予单位】：江苏科技大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：G644

【引证文献】