“211工程”十六年建设的实践与反思

发布时间：2018-02-16 07:13

本文关键词： “211工程” 评价指标问题对策机制　出处：《浙江师范大学》2012年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：“211工程”作为国家“九五”、“十五”、“十一五”期间教育领域惟一的国家重点建设项目,也是建国以来直接投资最大的高等教育建设项目,自1995年正式启动建设,到目前三期建设即将完成,已有十六年；“211工程”建设是否达到了初衷,以及在建设过程中出现了哪些偏差、应如何改正,到了该总结的时候。回顾和反思“211工程”的建设过程,为今后教育政策的制定和实施提供借鉴,对于政策实施过程中出现的一系列问题的解决积累经验,于整个国家经济建设大有裨益。 ‘211工程”的基本建设单位是高校。在本研究中,对“211工程”建设实践的评价指标选用的是：上海交通大学世界大学学术排名指标,英国《泰晤士报·高等教育增刊》世界大学排名指标,国内大学评价与排名指标,教育部学科评估指标,中国高等学校绩效评价指标。前三个指标是对“211工程”建设过程的动态评价,第四、第五个指标是对“211工程”静态结果的评价。此外,本研究还分析了“211工程”的相关政策文本。借助以上指标进行评价,得出结论：在学术水平上,“211工程”高校近年来名次上升迅速,但排名在200名左右,与世界一流大学的学术水平存在差距；在综合竞争力水平上,美国和英国无疑是教育强国的模板,中国大陆大学不及香港地区。“211工程”院校的进入机制不合理,实际可遴选的院校范围窄；管理机制不完善,资源利用率不高；评价机制不健全,缺少过程管理。因此,“211工程”不应“关闭大门”,需要做的是：进一步厘清概念,严格进入机制,使“211工程”建设真正滚动起来；完善管理机制,提高资源利用效率；健全评价机制,实行过程和结果的双重监控。
[Abstract]:As the only national key construction project in the field of education during the "Ninth Five-Year Plan", "15" and "11th Five-Year Plan", the "15 Project" is also the largest direct investment project in higher education since the founding of the people's Republic of China. Since 1995, the project has been officially launched. Up to now, the third phase of construction is about to be completed, and it has been 16 years since; whether the construction of the "211 Project" has achieved its original intention, what deviations have occurred in the construction process, how to correct it, and when the conclusion has been made, the construction process of the "211 Project" has been reviewed and reflected. To provide reference for the formulation and implementation of educational policy in the future, to accumulate experience in solving a series of problems in the process of policy implementation, and to benefit the economic construction of the whole country. In this study, the evaluation index of the construction practice of the "211 project" is selected as the academic ranking index of the World University of Shanghai Jiaotong University. The World University ranking Index, the domestic University Evaluation and ranking Index, the Ministry of Education discipline Evaluation Index, The first three indexes are the dynamic evaluation of the construction process of the "211 project", the fifth index is the static result evaluation of the "211 project", the fifth index is the evaluation of the static result of the "211 project". This study also analyzes the relevant policy texts of the 211 Project. With the help of the above indexes, it is concluded that, in academic level, the ranking of the "211 Project" universities has risen rapidly in recent years, but the ranking is about 200, which is different from the academic level of the world-class universities, and the level of comprehensive competitiveness. There is no doubt that the United States and Britain are the models of a powerful educational country, and universities in mainland China are not as good as Hong Kong. The entry mechanism of the "211 Project" institutions is unreasonable, the scope of the actual selectable institutions is narrow, the management mechanism is not perfect, and the utilization rate of resources is not high. Therefore, the "211 Project" should not "close the door". What needs to be done is to further clarify the concept, strictly enter the mechanism, make the construction of the "211 Project" really roll up, and perfect the management mechanism. Improve the efficiency of resource utilization, improve the evaluation mechanism, and implement dual monitoring of process and results.
【学位授予单位】：浙江师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：G649.2

【参考文献】